624 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
SEO drift monitoring: capture baselines of SEO-critical elements, detect changes, and track regressions over time. Git for SEO — baseline, diff, and track changes to your on-page SEO. Use when user says "SEO drift", "baseline", "track changes", "did anything break", "SEO regression", "compare SEO", "before and after", "monitor SEO changes", or "deployment check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create .agent/baseline.md and later compare against it. Use when capturing baseline build/lint/test results or investigating newly introduced findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SEO drift monitoring: capture baselines of SEO-critical elements, detect changes, and track regressions over time. Git for SEO: baseline, diff, and track changes to your on-page SEO. Use when user says "SEO drift", "baseline", "track changes", "did anything break", "SEO regression", "compare SEO", "before and after", "monitor SEO changes", or "deployment check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconcile baseline-versioned files that the `create-baseline upgrade` CLI staged for LLM-assisted semantic merge. Use when the CLI prints "Open Claude Code and run /upgrade-project to reconcile". Reads the stage manifest at `.claude/state/upgrade/<ts>/manifest.json`, reasons through each pending file's three-way delta in main context, writes a reconciled LOCAL, then deletes the stage when every file lands. Supports `--dry-run` (preview the reconciled diff without writing) and a structured "needs-user-input" fallback when the conflict cannot be disambiguated automatically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drift check between the baseline implementation on disk and the claims in `docs/init/seed.md` + cross-references in CLAUDE.md, README.md, and the rendered docs site. Verifies hook/agent/skill/command names + counts, settings.json wiring, project.json key presence, .mcp.json servers, vendored license files, and helper script presence. Exit 0 PASS / 1 FAIL — suitable for CI. Read-only; safe to invoke any time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or repair a project's .gitignore. Composes the baseline must-ignore set (the single source of truth in baseline-ignores.json) with optional gitignore.io enrichment, and merges add-only so existing entries are never lost. Use when a repo has no .gitignore, when the commit-leak guard reports a gap, or when onboarding a new stack. Trigger: "set up gitignore", "fix my gitignore", "ignore node_modules/secrets", "gitignore for <stack>".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "map what our surfaces say today", "inventory our current messaging", or "find the gap between what we say and what we mean"; produces the narrative baseline — a surface-by-surface inventory of what every owned touchpoint (homepage, pricing, docs, decks, social bios, email footers) claims RIGHT NOW, each line labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, plus a per-surface gap read vs the intended message and the drift-baseline snapshot the Evaluate phase measures future drift against. Not for authoring the canon — use message-system-architect; not for scoring the surfaces or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor. 现状叙事盘点/各触点口径/意图差距/漂移基线
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose MSBuild build performance bottlenecks using binary log analysis. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: identifying why builds are slow by analyzing binlog performance summaries, detecting ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) taking >5s, Roslyn analyzers consuming >30% of Csc time, single targets dominating >50% of build time, node utilization below 80%, excessive Copy tasks, NuGet restore running every build. Covers timeline analysis, Target/Task Performance Summary interpretation, and 7 common bottleneck categories. Use after build-perf-baseline has established measurements. DO NOT USE FOR: establishing initial baselines (use build-perf-baseline first), fixing incremental build issues (use incremental-build), parallelism tuning (use build-parallelism), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (overview, errors, search, items, properties); falls back to dotnet msbuild binlog replay + grep/cat when the MCP is unavailable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SEO drift monitoring: capture baselines of SEO-critical elements, detect changes, and track regressions over time. Git for SEO: baseline, diff, and track changes to your on-page SEO. Use when user says "SEO drift", "baseline", "track changes", "did anything break", "SEO regression", "compare SEO", "before and after", "monitor SEO changes", or "deployment check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
機械学習のない既存アプリに、推薦・分類・予測などを追加するための手順を整理します。課題とデータの確認から、最初のモデルの学習・評価・組み込みまでを支援します。
処理の高速化を、現状の計測、仮説ごとの変更案の比較、正しさの検証へ分解し、時間や費用の上限内で最も速い安全な案と再実行できる手順を残すスキル。
Multi-baseline counterfactual cost analysis. Compares actual session spend to hypothetical always-haiku / always-sonnet / always-opus routing baselines. Answers "is the routing earning its keep?" Negative savings flag over-escalation; positive savings quantify the router's win.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trains and evaluates single-agent reinforcement learning with Stable Baselines3 (PPO, SAC, DQN, TD3, DDPG, A2C), Gymnasium custom environments, vectorized rollouts, callbacks, and checkpoint normalization. Applies to reproducible RL experiments, continuous control, discrete actions, and SB3-Contrib recurrent or masked policies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the implementation source code of MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers, clients, and tool handlers against a security baseline — authentication, sessions, rate limiting, input-schema validation, official-SDK usage, RCE vectors, and the OWASP MCP Top 10 — producing a report with file/line evidence. Use this skill when: - Reviewing an MCP server implementation for security before release - Checking a server against the baseline controls (MCP-01 to MCP-05) and the OWASP MCP Top 10 - Auditing tools for RCE vectors (command/code injection, unsafe deserialization, path traversal, SSTI, dependency hijacking, SSRF) - Verifying auth, session, rate-limiting, and input-validation controls on a network-exposed server - Reviewing MCP client code that handles untrusted server responses and session IDs - Requests like "review this MCP server for security" or "is my MCP server implementation secure?"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Daily reusable-session runbook for cloud-spend anomaly detection on AWS. Maintains a per-service/per-account spend baseline from Cost Explorer, flags spend that breaks out of that baseline, attributes the likely driver (a new resource, a traffic surge, a region), and alerts {{alert_channel}} with the delta. Read-only and alert-only — never modifies or deletes a resource or changes a budget.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare baseline and current Pinot JMH benchmark results using an isolated baseline worktree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish MSBuild/.NET build performance baselines before optimizing. USE FOR: a .NET build or solution that is slow or has build-performance concerns; cold, warm, incremental, or no-op measurements; before/after comparisons; CI build output caching; static graph build decisions; artifacts output; and dependency graph trimming. Start here before build-perf-diagnostics, incremental-build, or build-parallelism. DO NOT USE for webpack, npm, JavaScript bundlers, or other non-MSBuild build systems. For detailed target/task/analyzer bottleneck analysis after baselining, use build-perf-diagnostics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LQF Machine Learning Expert Guide - Routed skill for ML/Statistical Modeling with Critical Discussion Mode. Triggers on: machine learning, modeling, prediction, training, classification, regression, clustering, deep learning, neural network, model evaluation, feature engineering, hyperparameter tuning, overfitting, underfitting, baseline, ablation study, critique my approach, review my model, is this a good idea, should I use, what's wrong with, evaluate my solution, challenge my assumptions, discuss my approach Engages in critical discussion with minimum 3 rounds of iterative refinement. Challenges both user proposals and own suggestions with fact-based critique. Demands evidence and baselines before accepting solutions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run `doca_bench` (DOCA 2.7.0 or newer) to measure throughput, bulk latency, precision latency, or maximum bandwidth for RDMA, Compress, AES-GCM, SHA, DMA, EC, Ethernet, Comch, or GPUNetIO on a host or BlueField Arm. Use it to discover enabled benchmark libraries, capture a reproducible command/version/device/environment baseline, compare stable runs against a declared tolerance, or diagnose configuration, device-binding, workload-precondition, and measurement failures. Trigger for requests such as measuring BlueField compression speed, NIC RDMA throughput, crypto latency, or a pre-upgrade baseline. Do not use for application end-to-end timing, custom benchmark code, DOCA installation, or binary patches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extracts clinical trial baseline data (study, region, participants, etc.) from article text or PMID. Checks PubMed for metadata; always falls back to LLM extraction for full details.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether the organisation's AI spend actually paid — measured against baselines, not vendor math or vibes. Use when a CFO asks what the AI tools returned, when renewing AI contracts, when consolidating overlapping AI subscriptions, or to build the measurement plan before the next spend. Produces an ROI audit with per-tool verdicts (keep/consolidate/cut), the honest-measurement method behind each number, and a baseline plan for whatever can't be scored yet. To forecast ROI before an investment use roi-estimator; this skill measures what already happened.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measure your own writing corpus for the words and sentence shapes you over-use, so an agent writing in your voice stops amplifying your tics into a style. Produces a counted baseline file and checks any new draft against it. Use when an agent's drafts start sounding like a caricature of you, before publishing anything written in your voice, or every ten new pieces to re-measure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simulate transcription factor perturbation effects on cell state in silico with CellOracle and Dynamo, and predict transcriptional responses to genetic perturbations with GEARS, scGen, and CPA. Covers the direction-not-magnitude principle, local-linear validity, the GRN/velocity error it inherits, baseline discipline (mean and additive baselines), and the validation gap. Use when predicting TF knockout or overexpression effects, ranking driver TFs for fate transitions, or planning perturbation experiments. For GRN construction see multiomics-grn; for experimental Perturb-seq see single-cell/perturb-seq.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Normalize read-depth copy-ratio profiles and segment them into copy-number regions using circular binary segmentation (CBS, DNAcopy), hidden Markov models, HaarSeg, and fused-lasso methods. Covers GC-content, mappability, and replication-timing (wave-artifact) bias correction, panel-of-normals/PCA denoising, diploid-baseline centering, and algorithm selection by sequencing depth and event size. Use when choosing a segmentation algorithm, correcting depth bias, diagnosing oversegmentation or a mis-centered baseline, tuning CBS or HMM parameters, or understanding why a downstream CNV caller produced fragmented or shifted segments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。