「mfa」の検索結果

Complete reference for 26 web2 bug classes with root causes, detection patterns, bypass tables, exploit techniques, and real paid examples. Covers IDOR, auth bypass, XSS (postMessage), SSRF (11 IP bypass techniques), SQLi, business logic, race conditions, OAuth/OIDC, file upload (10 bypass techniques), GraphQL, LLM/AI (ASI01-ASI10, MCP/RAG attacks), API misconfig (mass assignment, JWT, prototype pollution, CORS), ATO (9 paths), SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, MFA bypass (7 patterns), SAML attacks, error disclosure, CSS injection, LFI/RCE, insecure deserialization, dependency confusion, padding oracle. Use when hunting a specific vuln class or studying what makes bugs pay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security payloads, bypass tables, wordlists, gf pattern names, always-rejected bug list, and conditionally-valid-with-chain table. Use when you need specific payloads for XSS/SSRF/SQLi/XXE/NoSQLi/command injection/SSTI/IDOR/path-traversal/HTTP smuggling/WebSocket/MFA bypass, bypass techniques, or to check if a finding is submittable. Also use when asked about what NOT to submit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security payloads, bypass tables, wordlists, gf pattern names, always-rejected bug list, and conditionally-valid-with-chain table. Use when you need specific payloads for XSS/SSRF/SQLi/XXE/NoSQLi/command injection/SSTI/IDOR/path-traversal/HTTP smuggling/WebSocket/MFA bypass, or bypass techniques. Submittability and the always-rejected / what-NOT-to-submit decision are owned by triage-validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Okta-as-IdP red-team attack chain — tenant discovery, user enumeration (multiple vectors), authentication flow analysis (factors enumeration, push-notification fatigue, SMS bypass), password spray with lockout discipline, Okta-specific phishing primitives (kits, FastPass abuse, OIDC redirect_uri tampering), MFA enumeration, post-compromise admin API surface. Many enterprise orgs use Okta instead of (or alongside) Entra ID. Distinct endpoints, distinct rate-limiting, distinct factor flows. Use when recon shows `<tenant>.okta.com`, `<tenant>.okta-emea.com`, `<tenant>.oktapreview.com`, or autodiscover-style records pointing at Okta IdP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized authentication, authorization, and session security testing, including password policy, JWT/token, OAuth, and MFA bypass issues. Use when a task belongs to the auth testing domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides verified corrections for IAM behaviors that AI agents frequently get wrong — policy evaluation edge cases, trust policy gotchas, STS session limits, Organizations quirks, and SAML/MFA specifics. Also provides structured workflows for IAM role management and baseline policy generation from application source code or a Terraform plan JSON. Covers condition operator safety (ForAnyValue/ForAllValues with Null checks), bucket policy deny patterns (VPC endpoint restrictions, org paths), confused deputy protection, and service role creation for AWS services (Glue, CloudTrail, Lambda, ECS, etc.) with aws:SourceAccount/aws:SourceArn trust conditions. Applies when creating IAM roles, writing IAM or bucket policies, generating policies from application source code or a Terraform plan JSON, working with STS, Organizations, or condition operators, or any task needing a service or execution role. Does not cover non-IAM authorization like Cognito user-pool policies or app-level RBAC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authentication bypass testing playbook. Use when assessing login flows, password reset logic, account recovery, MFA bypass, token predictability, brute-force resistance, and session boundary flaws.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement authentication and authorization with Better Auth - a framework-agnostic TypeScript authentication framework. Features include email/password authentication with verification, OAuth providers (Google, GitHub, Discord, etc.), two-factor authentication (TOTP, SMS), passkeys/WebAuthn support, session management, role-based access control (RBAC), rate limiting, and database adapters. Use when adding authentication to applications, implementing OAuth flows, setting up 2FA/MFA, managing user sessions, configuring authorization rules, or building secure authentication systems for web applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Erstellt abgestimmte Bedingungen für Laden, Versand und Wiederverkäufer. Prüft Lieferung, Eigentumsvorbehalt, Sicherungsumfang und Mängelanzeigen getrennt für Verbraucher und kaufmännische Kunden.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up and manage SSO, SCIM provisioning, and MFA for startup teams using Google Workspace, Okta, or Azure AD. Use when centralizing authentication, onboarding SSO, or meeting compliance requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) advisor covering the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF v2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about SWIFT CSP, CSCF controls, SWIFT security attestation, KYC-SA portal, SWIFT architecture types (A1/A2/A3/A4/B), mandatory vs advisory controls, independent assessment, SWIFT secure zone, secure flow zone, MFA for operators, SWIFT messaging security, payment fraud prevention on SWIFT, gap analysis for CSCF, or compliance with SWIFT's 32 controls (26 mandatory, 6 advisory in v2026) across the three objectives: Secure Your Environment, Know and Limit Access, Detect and Respond. Control 2.4 (Back-Office Data Flow Security) is now mandatory in v2026. v2026 attestation window is July 1– December 31, 2026. Trigger for any SWIFT CSP or CSCF compliance question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert UK Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus advisor — the NCSC-owned, IASME-delivered baseline certification. Covers the current Danzell question set (Requirements for IT Infrastructure v3.3, mandatory for assessment accounts from April 27, 2026) and the Willow transition, the five control themes (firewalls, secure configuration, security update management, user access control, malware protection), scoping rules for cloud services, BYOD and home working, the 14-day critical-update rule, mandatory MFA for cloud services and the new auto-fail questions, CE Plus technical audits, pricing, annual renewal, the included cyber liability insurance, and procurement mandates (PPN 014, MoD Defence Cyber Certification, NHS). Use this skill whenever a user mentions Cyber Essentials, CE Plus, IASME, the UK government cyber certification, Danzell or Willow question sets, UK public-sector or MoD supply-chain security requirements, or wants a readiness gap assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) advisor covering the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF v2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about SWIFT CSP, CSCF controls, SWIFT security attestation, KYC-SA portal, SWIFT architecture types (A1/A2/A3/A4/B), mandatory vs advisory controls, independent assessment, SWIFT secure zone, secure flow zone, MFA for operators, SWIFT messaging security, payment fraud prevention on SWIFT, gap analysis for CSCF, or compliance with SWIFT's 32 controls (25 mandatory, 7 advisory in v2026) across the three objectives: Secure Your Environment, Know and Limit Access, Detect and Respond. Control 2.4 (Back-Office Data Flow Security) is now mandatory in v2026. v2026 attestation window is July 1– December 31, 2026. Trigger for any SWIFT CSP or CSCF compliance question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure Active Directory B2C development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when building B2C user flows/custom policies, configuring IdPs/MFA, securing APIs, automating CI/CD, or monitoring with Sentinel, and other Azure Active Directory B2C related development tasks. Not for Azure Role-based access control (use azure-rbac), Azure Information Protection (use azure-information-protection), Azure Security (use azure-security), Azure Sentinel (use azure-sentinel).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SaaS authentication and authorization patterns including JWT vs session strategies, multi-tenant isolation, RBAC, API key management, passwordless flows, MFA, and secure session handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure authentication patterns (OWASP, NIST). Use for login, registration, password reset, sessions, JWT, OAuth, MFA, passkeys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement authentication and authorization with Better Auth - a framework-agnostic TypeScript authentication framework. Features include email/password authentication with verification, OAuth providers (Google, GitHub, Discord, etc.), two-factor authentication (TOTP, SMS), passkeys/WebAuthn support, session management, role-based access control (RBAC), rate limiting, and database adapters. Use when adding authentication to applications, implementing OAuth flows, setting up 2FA/MFA, managing user sessions, configuring authorization rules, or building secure authentication systems for web applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wiki-first "what do I use" lookup - pick the automated TOOL (wiki/tools/), then the PAYLOAD/technique (wiki/payloads/ + wiki/cheatsheets/), for a surface/service/vuln-class BEFORE hand-rolling or working from memory. Use for "tool for <service>", "automated tools for web/<service>", "what should I run on <surface>", "which tool for <X>", "payloads for <X>", "payload arsenal", "cheatsheet for <X>", "how do I exploit <tech/class>", "exploit/attack chain for <X>", "arsenal", any SSRF/XSS/SQLi/SSTI/LFI/JWT/XXE/IDOR/NoSQL/deserialization/CSRF/CORS/CRLF/GraphQL/smuggling/web-cache/OAuth/SAML/MFA/crypto/LDAP/XPath/WebAuthn/file-upload/IMDS/prompt-injection/Modbus ask, plus "privesc arsenal", "CVE arsenal", "default creds", "nuclei templates", "sqlmap/hydra/nmap/bloodhound", "password attacks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure TOTP authenticator apps, send OTP codes via email/SMS, manage backup codes, handle trusted devices, and implement 2FA sign-in flows using Better Auth's twoFactor plugin. Use when users need MFA, multi-factor authentication, authenticator setup, or login security with Better Auth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Microbial Physiologist. Use when a task calls for Microbial Physiologist judgment. Reasons from Monod/chemostat (μ = D), YX/S and Pirt maintenance, Crabtree/overflow, 13C-MFA and FBA, and BMSAB taxonomy; treats OD-as-biomass yield error, FBA-as-measured-flux, washout misread, and portable ms across media as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Industrial Ecologist. Use when a task calls for Industrial Ecologist judgment. Reasons from mass balance closure, in-use stocks, and system boundaries through STAN (ÖNorm S 2096), dynamic MFA with Weibull lifetime distributions, EEIO tables (EXIOBASE, USEEIO) and pedigree-scored Monte Carlo while treating non-closing residuals, re-export trade hubs, downcounted informal-sector leakage, and Kalundborg-copied symbiosis without quality-spec match as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Fermentation Scientist. Use when a task calls for Fermentation Scientist judgment. Reasons from Monod–Luedeking–Piret kinetics, overflow μcrit, OTR/RQ/RAMOS analytics, DoE media optimization, and 13C-MFA/COBRApy flux bounds while treating stuck-ferment ethanol×T synergy, SSF heat/moisture gradients, and OD-as-biomass red herrings as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end testing of email-dependent flows — signup confirmation, password reset, magic-link login, OTP/MFA codes, and notification emails. Covers the capture-inbox decision tree (Mailpit, Mailosaur, MailSlurp, Ethereal), Playwright polling without fixed sleeps, regex extraction of links/OTPs from the email body, deterministic per-test addresses (plus-addressing, per-inbox), subject/from/header/link assertions, and SPF/DKIM/DMARC deliverability checks as a separate suite. Use when: "test the signup confirmation email," "password reset email test," "magic-link login test," "capture OTP from email," "Mailpit," "Mailosaur," "MailSlurp," "email arrives flaky in CI," "assert email subject/from/links." Not for: Sending transactional email from your app code, or API-only contract tests of an email provider — those are api-testing / app concerns. Email HTML rendering across clients (Outlook/Gmail dark mode) is out of scope (note it as a gap; use visual-testing or Litmus). Related: playwright-automation, api-testing, test-data-management, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。