345 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
课题研究员（谭溯源 Tan）。由 research-chief-editor 主理人调度，对课题进行广泛初步调研（Phase 1）或对子主题进行深度研究（Phase 3）。多源聚合（≥5 来源），撰写带引用的研究草稿，覆盖学术/权威机构/行业/媒体多级来源。 触发词：由 research-chief-editor 主理人调度执行，不直接面向用户。当主理人下发 Phase 1 初始调研或 Phase 3 深度调研任务时激活。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skippable Phase 0 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use only on declared need for higher-quality Stage-2 evidence: a promotion candidate, or a skill that gaia-meta-sweep flagged as under-evidenced. Given a skill id, source repo/context, and needed evidence types (benchmark-result, arxiv, peer-review, social-signal), it runs Firecrawl searches, scrapes top hits to markdown, and appends discovered sources into Phase 1 inputs. Missing benchmark evidence is recorded as benchmark-source candidates first, not direct scoring rows. Trigger phrases: "discover evidence", "find new evidence", "Phase 0", "run ev-discovery", "search for benchmarks/papers", "under-evidenced", "promotion candidate needs stronger proof". This is the ONLY ev-* skill that searches the web for NEW evidence; other ev-* skills aggregate or verify known sources. Requires Firecrawl to be usable (`firecrawl --status` authenticated OR FIRECRAWL_API_KEY set); skips gracefully when neither holds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply source-aware mechanical-engineering judgment to research, analysis, coding, writing, teaching, research identity, and release work. Use for thermal-fluid systems, heat transfer, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, HVAC, energy systems, turbomachinery, piping, multiphase flow, experiments, correlations, CFD, reduced-order models, AI/ML, uncertainty, engineering datasets, literature reviews, citations, manuscripts, reviewer revisions, Overleaf packages, figures, proposals, research software, reproducibility, public releases, engineering teaching materials, or a research-project logo and visual identity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research Guardian - Ethics Advisory & Bias Detection across all research stages Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Surface-level screening, deep contextual analysis, constructive recommendations Use when: reviewing research ethics, checking for bias, assessing trustworthiness, QRP screening Triggers: ethics review, IRB, bias detection, QRP, trustworthiness, research integrity, p-hacking, HARKing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-AI research using available external providers (Double Diamond Discover phase) - Questions about best practices, patterns, or ecosystem research PRIORITY TRIGGERS (always invoke): "octo research", "octo discover", "co-research", "co-discover" DO NOT use for: simple file searches (use Read/Grep), questions Claude can answer directly, debugging issues (use skill-debug), or "what are my options" for decision support.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Model a Phase-Locked Loop (PLL) IC from its datasheet or system specs using Mixed-Signal Blockset. Without this skill, agents universally select the wrong solver and produce non-functional PLL models — 100% of unguided attempts fail. Covers Integer-N, Fractional-N, Dual Modulus architectures, loop filter design, lock time optimization, VCO phase noise configuration, and msbPllArchitectures/msbPllFoundation block assembly. Use when: PLL modeling, frequency synthesizer design, phase noise simulation, lock time analysis, charge pump design, loop filter tuning, datasheet-to-model, Mixed-Signal Blockset PLL, msbPllArchitectures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before planning a frontend phase, or when a UI contract must be locked before implementation. Orchestrates gsd-ui-researcher and gsd-ui-checker to validate, research, and verify UI-SPEC.md for the phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use after a phase has been discussed, or when the user asks for a PLAN.md for a roadmap phase. Researches, spawns gsd-planner, verifies with gsd-plan-checker, and iterates; supports --gaps, --prd, --skip-research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates high-converting 'X vs Y' and 'X alternatives' SEO pages that capture comparison search traffic. Researches competitors, writes honest comparison content, and adds schema markup (FAQPage, ItemList). Use when someone needs alternatives pages, comparison content, or says 'alternatives page', 'vs page', 'comparison', 'competitor alternatives', 'X vs Y page', or wants to capture competitor brand search traffic with SEO content. Also trigger when someone wants to rank for competitor brand names, capture competitor search traffic, create a compare page, or build a competitive content hub. Even if they just say 'how do we compete with X' or 'we need to show up when people search for [competitor]', this skill applies. Owns the individual alternatives / vs / comparison page. For a batch roadmap of many pages with a phase tracker, see /seo-machine. For programmatic SEO and templated content at scale, see /seo-content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 1 of the Forge pipeline. Gather real context from the codebase, answer everything the code can answer through exploration, then grill the user one question at a time (with a recommended answer) for only what code cannot answer, and write a research document. Use when starting /forge-research or the research step of /forgemaster, or when the user wants a research-first investigation before planning a feature.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
機能追加や不具合修正などの開発を、規模に応じて調査・計画・テスト・レビューへ振り分けます。計画承認とコミット確認を組み込む、関連スキル共通の手順です。
Use when designing a prospective clinical study before submission — selecting and classifying endpoints (primary / key-secondary / exploratory, with surrogate-endpoint flagging), estimating sample size and power for two-arm designs (means / proportions / survival), or scoring a study plan for feasibility and a GO / GO-WITH-CONDITIONS / REDESIGN / NO-GO phase-gate decision. Every output is an ESTIMATE plus a named human owner (clinician / biostatistician / regulatory owner) — never clinical fact, never a finished protocol. Distinct from ra-qm-team, which handles the regulatory/QM submission (ISO 13485, EU MDR, FDA 510(k)/PMA/QSR), not the study design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent C3 - Mixed Methods Design Consultant Comprehensive mixed methods research design specialist covering sequential, concurrent, embedded, and multiphase designs with Morse notation. Core Capabilities: - Sequential Explanatory (QUAN → qual): Explain quantitative results - Sequential Exploratory (QUAL → quan): Develop instruments - Convergent Parallel (QUAN + QUAL): Comprehensive understanding - Embedded (QUAN(qual)): Secondary strand addresses different question - Multiphase: Long-term projects with iterative phases - Morse notation interpretation and recommendation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comet Phase 5: Archive. Invoke with /comet-archive. Merge delta specs into main specs with OpenSpec semantics, archive change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided journey from a large aged codebase everyone fears to touch to one that is safe to change, legible, bounded, and resilient - paid down in place without a rewrite. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, refactoring-patterns, clean-code, software-design-philosophy, clean-architecture, pragmatic-programmer, release-it, domain-driven-design - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (TESTING.md, TECH-DEBT.md, REMOVE-TECHNICAL-DEBT-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to tame a legacy codebase, pay down technical debt safely, avoid a big-bang rewrite, or says 'we are afraid to touch this code'. For a fresh vibe-coded prototype, improve-code-quality; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for a product-and-UX pass, improve-app; to optimize a working codebase for speed, architecture-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided journey from a working-but-untested vibe-coded prototype to a production-ready product with tests, clean structure, a business-rules boundary, and resilience at scale. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-code, refactoring-patterns, software-design-philosophy, clean-architecture, pragmatic-programmer, release-it, system-design, ddia-systems - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (TESTING.md, TECH-DEBT.md, IMPROVE-CODE-QUALITY-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to harden an AI-generated prototype, add tests before refactoring, make code safe to change, or says 'this works on my machine but I am scared to touch it'. For an aged codebase, remove-technical-debt; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for a product and UX pass, improve-app; to optimize speed and structure, architecture-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a planned but unstarted phase should come off the roadmap. Removes the phase, renumbers the phases after it into a clean sequence, and commits the change as the historical record.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when urgent work surfaces mid-milestone and must land between two planned phases without renumbering the roadmap. Inserts it as a decimal phase such as 72.1 after the phase the user names.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a phase has unresolved decisions before planning and no CONTEXT.md exists. Asks adaptive questions on the phase's gray areas and writes {phase_num}-CONTEXT.md with locked decisions; --auto, --chain, --power change the questioning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a feature architecture by analyzing existing codebase patterns and conventions, then provide a comprehensive implementation blueprint with specific files to create or modify, component designs, data flows, and a build sequence. Use this skill when the user asks for an architecture design, an implementation plan for a non-trivial feature, or when dispatched as a sub-task during feature-dev architecture phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill for the architecture phases of an MBSE workflow in MATLAB, when writing idempotent buildXxx.m scripts that produce a three-layer RFLPV architecture (Functional, Logical, Physical) with interface dictionaries, stereotype profiles, allocation sets, and requirements Implement links. Trigger for defining stereotype properties, functional-to-logical / logical-to-physical allocation, mapping requirements to components via slreq Implement links, or running quantitative roll-up analysis on the architecture. Do NOT trigger for ad-hoc structural edits to an already-built System Composer model (adding one component, rewiring a port) — use `building-simulink-models` with `model_edit` for that. Works alongside the `system-composer` skill for detailed SC API patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Five-phase pipeline (triage → clarify → research → PRD → plan) that turns a raw idea into four linked files: clarifying questions, deep research, a PRD with non-goals and metrics, and a phased execution plan with mermaid user journey and kill criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Mileva Method (CRISP) — Phase 3: Investigate. Process mapping for existing or greenfield processes, user journey mapping, UX discovery, project goals, system architecture (integration map + data flow). Use after outcome alignment. Triggers on "investigate", "phase 3", "map the process", "process mapping", "user journey", "as-is process", or after Phase R exit checklist is complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。