「phase arc」の検索結果

Use on any core for first-run planning intake — Phase 0 runs the vendored BMAD-METHOD planning shelf, shared by every core, and Phase 1 (mining `04-prd.md` into intent records plus the Add-ons/sync-and-remote-entities decision) is full-stack-app's and pwa-app's shared procedure — identical mechanics, a different decision at step 5/8. Phase 0 also defines compressed intake, the path a user's explicit "just build it" choice takes on full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored, and copywriting cores: one batched round of questions in place of the shelf, writing a thinned archive at the same paths so Phase 1 (or, on copywriting, that core's own mining step), `ux-planner`, and the Re-entry pass all keep their documented source. Also use for the Re-entry pass, which mines new scope into additional intents without re-running the shelf, on any core with a module axis to add an intent to (full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored) — landing-page has none, so its own new-scope path runs through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s Correction Protocol instead. Invoked by the `planner` agent, which decides the path; don't run standalone. landing-page runs this skill's Phase 0 on first run, then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s own planning-intake section, that core's counterpart to this skill's Phase 1. copywriting runs this skill's Phase 0 the same way (full or compressed), then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-copywriting-loop`'s own planning-intake section into a what/audience/register brief — no module axis, so its own new-scope path runs through that loop's Correction Protocol rather than the Re-entry pass below. An authored core runs this skill's Phase 0, then `hedgehog-core-design`, then this skill's Phase 1 mining against the designed layer sequence. A brownfield adoption (`hedgehog-adopt`) never runs this skill's shelf at all — the drivers BMAD elicits are already settled facts of a repo that already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm research ideas", "use 5W1H framework", "identify research gaps", "conduct gap analysis", "start research project", "conduct literature review", "define research question", "select research method", "plan research", or mentions research project initiation phase. Provides comprehensive guidance for research startup workflow from idea generation to planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your competitor just launched. You have no idea how they grew so fast. Should you reverse-engineer their website? Track their social media? Map their growth flywheel? This gives you the complete SOP — from Wayback Machine snapshots to X/Twitter propagation analysis to growth flywheel scoring. Built from 150+ AI startup competitive analyses including the Lovable case study (4.3M views, 229K impressions launch day). By @WeiYipei. What's inside: • 4-step research framework (website teardown → social media → traffic sources → ad spend) • 3-version website evolution analysis (V1 / Beta / Launch via Wayback Machine) • X/Twitter propagation chain mapping (4-phase model + single-post teardown template) • Growth flywheel 6-stage scoring system (Activation → Referral → Acquisition → Retention → Revenue → Product) • KOL identification framework (Traffic King / Topic Starter / Mindset Shifter) • Content effectiveness ranking (validated: Visual Demo > User Story > Competitor Comparison) • ICP deep analysis template + Freemium pricing teardown • Complete self-check checklist 🇨🇳 你的竞品刚刚爆了。你完全不知道他们怎么做到的。该拆官网？盯社媒？画增长飞轮？这份 SOP 给你从 Wayback Machine 快照到 X/Twitter 传播链路还原到飞轮六阶段评分的完整方法论。基于 150+ AI 创业公司竞品分析实战，含 Lovable 完整案例。 🇯🇵 競合が突然バズった。どうやって成長したか全く分からない。このSOPは、Waybackスナップショットからツイッター伝播チェーン分析、フライホイール6段階スコアリングまでの完全な競合調査フレームワークを提供します。150以上のAIスタートアップ分析から構築。 🇰🇷 경쟁사가 갑자기 폭발적으로 성장했습니다. 어떻게 그렇게 빨리 성장했는지 모릅니다. 이 SOP는 Wayback 스냅샷부터 X/Twitter 전파 체인 분석, 플라이휠 6단계 스코어링까지 완전한 경쟁사 조사 프레임워크를 제공합니다. 150개 이상의 AI 스타트업 분석에서 구축. Triggers: "competitor research" | "competitive analysis" | "competitor analysis" | "growth flywheel" | "market research" | "竞品调研" | "竞品分析" | "增长飞轮" | "传播链路" | "競合分析" | "경쟁사 분석" | "social media teardown" | "Twitter propagation" | "content strategy analysis"

This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm research ideas", "use 5W1H framework", "identify research gaps", "conduct gap analysis", "start research project", "conduct literature review", "define research question", "select research method", "plan research", or mentions research project initiation phase. Provides comprehensive guidance for research startup workflow from idea generation to planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

🇺🇸 AI Product / SaaS Go-Global Complete SOP — From competitor research to launch to monetization. A full-cycle playbook covering Phase 0-5 (market validation, positioning, first 100 users, user interviews, beta-to-growth) plus open-source launch, Product Hunt, Reddit, SEO/GEO, conversion, and org principles. **Defaults to dev tools / OSS / B2B SaaS; for 2C products (education, apps, games) the launch channels & metrics differ — see gingiris-seo-geo/references/2c-adaptation.md.** 🇨🇳 AI 产品 / SaaS 企业出海完整 SOP — 从竞品调研到 Launch 到商业化的全流程操作手册。覆盖 Phase 0-5（市场验证、定位、前100用户、用户访谈、Beta转增长）+ 开源发布、Product Hunt、Reddit、SEO/GEO、转化与组织原则。**默认面向开发者工具/开源/B2B SaaS；2C 产品（教育/应用/游戏）的启动渠道与指标不同，见 gingiris-seo-geo/references/2c-adaptation.md。** 🇯🇵 AI製品/SaaS海外展開フルサイクルSOP — 競合調査からローンチ、マネタイズまで。Phase 0-5（市場検証、ポジショニング、最初の100ユーザー、ユーザーインタビュー、ベータから成長）＋オープンソース、Product Hunt、Reddit、SEO/GEO、コンバージョン、組織原則。 🇰🇷 AI 제품/SaaS 글로벌 진출 완전 SOP — 경쟁사 조사부터 런칭, 수익화까지 전 주기 플레이북. Phase 0-5(시장 검증, 포지셔닝, 첫 100명 사용자, 사용자 인터뷰, 베타→성장) + 오픈소스 런칭, Product Hunt, Reddit, SEO/GEO, 전환, 조직 원칙. Triggers: "go global" | "出海" | "overseas expansion" | "GTM" | "cold start" | "launch strategy" | "international expansion" | "海外增长" | "出海SOP" | "product launch overseas" | "海外进出" | "グローバル展開" | "글로벌 진출" | "go-to-market" | "出海打法"

Use when building games or interactive software in Phaser 3 with TypeScript — scenes, gameplay code, input, Arcade physics, animations, audio, tweens, asset preloading, save systems, performance work, or scaffolding with Vite. Triggers on "Phaser", "Phaser 3", "Phaser.Scene", "Phaser.Game", "Arcade physics", "Matter physics", "tilemap", "Tiled", "GameObject", "Container", "Group", "Vite + Phaser", or any `.ts`/`.js` file in a Phaser project. For game design and balance see game-systems-designer, game-balancer; for game intake see game-design-shaper. For Godot/C# see godot-engineer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the public web and crawl URLs via the Unique AI Platform's `unique-cli web-search` command, with automatic per-turn citation tracking so cited web facts render as clickable external reference chips and `<sup>N</sup>` footnotes on the Unique platform. ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks to search the public web, research a topic online, look up news/articles/regulations, fetch the contents of one or more URLs, or perform any "two-phase" web research (search → review snippets → crawl selected URLs for full content). Routes through the Unique AI Platform's `/web-search-api` endpoints, so the engine (Google, Brave, Tavily, Jina, Firecrawl, …) and crawler are resolved server-side from the current environment — you never need to manage engine API keys yourself. Use this instead of fabricating answers from training data whenever fresh / source-cited information is needed. Do NOT use this skill for the internal knowledge base (`unique-cli search`) or for arbitrary tool execution (`unique-cli mcp`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from an app idea to a deliberate architecture: boundaries, domain model, data decisions, and resilience, making only the expensive-to-reverse decisions and deferring the rest. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - clean-architecture, domain-driven-design, system-design, ddia-systems, software-design-philosophy, release-it, pragmatic-programmer, 37signals-way - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (ARCHITECTURE.md, DESIGN-CODE-ARCHITECTURE-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to design a new app's architecture, choose boundaries and a domain model, decide monolith versus microservices, or says 'how should I structure this app'. If a codebase already exists, use remove-technical-debt (aged), improve-code-quality (fresh prototype), or architecture-optimization (slow but working); if unvalidated, run create-business or create-app first. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up and debug a Phaser 4 game: the Game config, the Scene lifecycle (init/preload/create/update), the asset loader, cameras, and cross-scene communication. Use when building or debugging a Phaser game — when the user mentions Phaser, Phaser.Game, Phaser.Scene, preload/create/update, this.load, this.add, or scene transitions. For Arcade Physics movement/collisions use phaser-arcade-physics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive 7-phase SEO optimization workflow covering technical SEO auditing, keyword research strategy, on-page optimization, content SEO and E-E-A-T, structured data implementation, link building, and AI search optimization. Use when auditing search engine visibility, diagnosing ranking issues, implementing schema markup, conducting keyword research, optimizing content for E-E-A-T signals, or adapting for AI-driven search (AI Overviews, SGE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous comprehensive refactoring. Three-phase pipeline — Phase 1 /refactor (tactical, loops internally to convergence) → Phase 2 loop of /review-arch + /implement-batch until architectural findings converge below a severity floor (default HIGH+) → Phase 3 /refactor (catches tactical issues introduced by restructuring). Auto-approves /review-arch ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, breaking-change proposals, repeated implementation failure, or Phase-2 hard-cap exhaustion (5 architectural iterations).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic research companion — brainstorm, evaluate, and decide on research directions. TRIGGER when the user wants to brainstorm research, evaluate research ideas, do project triage, or explore a problem space. Orchestrates brainstormer, idea-critic, and research-strategist agents through a 6-phase pipeline: Seed → Diverge → Evaluate → Deepen → Frame → Decide. Includes Carlini's conclusion-first test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VS-Enhanced Qualitative Design Consultant with Ethnography & Action Research Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids overused phenomenology, proposes context-optimal qualitative strategies Absorbed H1 (Ethnographic Research Advisor) and H2 (Action Research Facilitator) capabilities Use when: selecting qualitative research design, planning phenomenology/grounded theory/case study/ethnography/action research Triggers: phenomenology, 현상학, grounded theory, 근거이론, case study, 사례연구, narrative inquiry, ethnography, 민족지, action research, 실행연구, qualitative design

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a working codebase grown slow and tangled to one measurably fast, cleanly bounded, and readable. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-architecture, software-design-philosophy, refactoring-patterns, system-design, ddia-systems, release-it, pragmatic-programmer - every phase carries its method inline so it runs standalone, asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (PERFORMANCE.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, ARCHITECTURE-OPTIMIZATION-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to make an app faster, untangle drifted boundaries, fix slow endpoints and queries, or says 'it works but it is slow and getting worse'. For an untested prototype, improve-code-quality; for an aged codebase you fear to touch, remove-technical-debt; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for marketing-site page speed, improve-website. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a raw app idea to a validated, cleanly architected first version that ships on a sustainable cadence. Orchestrates ten skills phase by phase - lean-startup, design-sprint, clean-architecture, domain-driven-design, clean-code, pragmatic-programmer, system-design, ios-hig-design, 37signals-way, software-design-philosophy - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (PRODUCT.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, EXPERIMENTS.md, CREATE-APP-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to build a new app, validate an idea before writing code, architect an MVP that will not need a rewrite, or says 'help me build my app the right way'. App already exists: use improve-app or grow-app. Business idea not yet validated: run create-business first. Marketing site only: use create-website. Architecture-only question: design-code-architecture. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you want phase research without planning: to investigate before deciding a phase is feasible, or to re-research after a plan already exists. Standalone command; most workflows should use /gsd-plan-phase instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two related workflows for a locally-cloned codebase, in one skill. Documentation mode produces a single, comprehensive, verifiable architecture document primarily by reading files on disk (local-first) — use it whenever the user wants to understand, map, document, research, or onboard onto a codebase ("research this repo", "write up the architecture", "do an architecture deep dive", "document how this codebase works", "map the system design", "create an onboarding doc"). Modernization mode generates a phased plan to modernize, migrate, upgrade, or rewrite a legacy system ("modernize this", "plan the migration", "how would we rewrite this", "how do we get off this legacy stack"); if no architecture document exists yet it first runs Documentation mode, then continues straight through to the plan. It assumes the legacy stack may be dead, runs a time-boxed feasibility spike, and picks the highest achievable rung on a safety ladder instead of demanding a fully-green legacy CI gate up front.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Phaser 4 Arcade Physics: enable the world, give sprites bodies, set velocity/acceleration/gravity, and resolve collisions with colliders, overlaps, groups, and world bounds. Use when a Phaser game needs movement or collisions — when the user mentions Arcade Physics, this.physics, setVelocity, collider, overlap, gravity, onFloor, or a platformer/top-down controller. For game config, scenes, and the loader use phaser-core.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic keyword research powered by web search and brand context. Use this skill whenever the user mentions keywords, keyword research, SEO topics, content topics, 'what should I write about', content strategy, blog ideas, search traffic, or content planning. Also trigger when the user wants to plan what content to create, when existing content isn't attracting search traffic, when any skill needs keyword-plan.md but it doesn't exist, or when the user asks about SEO in the context of content creation. Even casual mentions like 'I need blog post ideas' or 'what topics should I cover' warrant this skill. 8-phase process from seed to content brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。