「phases」の検索結果

Use for the PROVIDER half of getting a locally running CopilotKit Channels agent to answer in Slack, when no Slack app exists yet — setting up a Channels bot in Slack for the first time, creating the Slack app and its tokens, attaching it to a managed Intelligence Channel, or when a Channel reports setup_required, sits at "Waiting for runtime", the Channel is Online but a Slack mention gets no reply, or a Slack app was built with Socket Mode instead of an Intelligence Request URL. Scoped to an OpenTag checkout, or the OpenTag example inside a channels-sdk clone — the phases assume those conventions (app/channel.tsx, app/env.ts, INTELLIGENCE_CHANNEL_NAME, a local agent on port 8123) and do not describe a project scaffolded by copilotkit init, which already ships its own channel host. If the Slack app and Channel already exist and the question is about declaring or customising the Channel in code, use the copilotkit-channels skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a structured ransomware incident response playbook aligned with the CISA StopRansomware Guide and NIST Cybersecurity Framework, covering preparation, detection, containment, eradication, recovery, and post-incident phases with actionable checklists. Use when creating or updating a ransomware playbook, running a CISA-aligned readiness assessment, or validating response steps during a tabletop exercise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and MITRE ATT&CK ransomware techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new skills following the GBrain conformance standard. Generates SKILL.md with frontmatter, Contract, Phases, Output Format, and Anti-Patterns. Checks MECE against existing skills. Updates manifest and resolver.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill validation framework PLUS daily test-suite health and regression intelligence. Validates skill conformance (frontmatter, manifest coverage, resolver coverage). Runs the project test suite in tiered phases (unit / evals / integration / system health), classifies failures, and produces a regression-aware report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ready to advance between development phases? PASS/CONCERNS/NOT ASSESSED/FAIL with blockers and required artifacts. 'Can we move to production?'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolutionary ideation engine — loop-controlled multi-cycle idea generation through phases of dreaming, cross-domain stealing, recombination, fitness testing, selection, and Lamarckian meta-learning, producing ranked novel solution candidates with provenance. USE WHEN ideate, id8, novel ideas, evolve ideas, dream up solutions, innovate, breakthrough ideas, idea evolution, multi-cycle creativity, need genuinely new approaches. NOT FOR quick single-pass brainstorming (use BeCreative).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Display project statistics — phases, plans, requirements, git metrics, and timeline

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate UI design contract (UI-SPEC.md) for frontend phases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-phase management — add, insert, remove, or edit phases in ROADMAP.md (roadmap phase CRUD)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an AI-SPEC.md design contract for phases that involve building AI systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive command center for managing multiple phases from one terminal

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run all remaining phases autonomously — discuss→plan→execute per phase

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or update a long-term bar prep (or exam prep) study plan — phases, subjects weighted by weakness, daily session schedule, adaptive to session history in study-plan.yaml. Use when the user says "build a study plan", "plan my bar prep", "schedule my studying", or "how should I study for [X]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze past exams from the same professor to surface patterns — subject weighting, recurring issue-spot traps, favored hypo types, policy-vs-doctrine mix — and forecast likely emphases for the upcoming exam. Use when the user says "what's on the exam", "analyze past exams", "predict the exam", or shares past exams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Feature planning and implementation with 4 adaptive phases (Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute). Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Writes testable requirements in EARS notation, atomic tasks, atomic Conventional Commits, and requirement traceability. Ships deterministic Python validation scripts so structural gates are enforced by code, not memory. Features an independent Verifier (author != verifier, evidence-or-zero), a discrimination sensor, a decision log (STATE.md), a test-coverage matrix, and a self-improving lessons layer. Stack-agnostic and tool-agnostic. Use when (1) planning features, (2) implementing with verification and atomic commits, (3) validating an implementation against a spec. Triggers on "specify feature", "discuss feature", "design", "tasks", "implement", "validate", "verify work", "UAT", "record decision", "pause work", "resume work". Do NOT use for pure architecture decomposition analysis or standalone technical design documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, implement, tune, or test readable tactical action combat for web games. Use for attack timing, guard and dodge windows, hit contact, posture, lock-on, weapons, boss phases, combat feedback, and deterministic combat tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, implement, tune, or test Three.js action-game encounters. Use for arena layout, enemy composition, spawn pacing, objectives, boss phases, reward cadence, encounter fixtures, and difficulty validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze AI config evolution in a git repo. Use when mapping AI adoption history, finding when configs were first introduced, charting commit velocity by month, or identifying maturity phases in a project's AI tooling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for diagnosing and improving MSBuild project evaluation performance. USE FOR: builds slow before any compilation starts, high evaluation time in binlog analysis, expensive glob patterns walking large directories (node_modules, .git, bin/obj), deep import chains (>20 levels), preprocessed output >10K lines indicating heavy evaluation, property functions with file I/O ($([System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(...))), multiple evaluations per project. Covers the 5 MSBuild evaluation phases, glob optimization via DefaultItemExcludes, import chain analysis with /pp preprocessing. DO NOT USE FOR: compilation-time slowness (use build-perf-diagnostics), incremental build issues (use incremental-build), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent C3 - Mixed Methods Design Consultant Comprehensive mixed methods research design specialist covering sequential, concurrent, embedded, and multiphase designs with Morse notation. Core Capabilities: - Sequential Explanatory (QUAN → qual): Explain quantitative results - Sequential Exploratory (QUAL → quan): Develop instruments - Convergent Parallel (QUAN + QUAL): Comprehensive understanding - Embedded (QUAN(qual)): Secondary strand addresses different question - Multiphase: Long-term projects with iterative phases - Morse notation interpretation and recommendation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and run custom background analysis workers with composable phases. Use when you need automated code analysis, security scanning, pattern learning, or API documentation generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。