「reframing」の検索結果

Techniques for generating novel ideas, reframing problems, and escaping fixed mental models. Covers lateral thinking (de Bono), Six Thinking Hats, random stimulation, provocation operators (PO), analogical transfer, assumption challenging, and divergent-then-convergent thinking cycles. Use when the goal is to produce new options or perspectives rather than evaluate existing ones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI pressure redirection — handling conflicting demands, tool failures, and competing constraints by blending with incoming force then reframing. Use when receiving contradictory instructions from different sources, during tool failure cascades where the planned approach becomes unviable, when scope pressure threatens to expand the task beyond what was asked, or when user frustration or correction needs to be absorbed rather than deflected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tailor a resume to a job description with ATS keyword optimization, gap analysis, and rewritten bullets — zero fabrication. Use when the user wants /tailor for a single role, /batch for multiple JDs, career pivot reframing, or interview prep questions from a tailored application.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Camera Operator (television, video, or film) — deciding how to physically execute a director/DP's shot on a moving or stabilized platform, reframing live for unpredictable subject movement, protecting a frame for multi-format delivery, or diagnosing why a take got flagged for reshoot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

User experience and interface design expert for wireframing, user research, and design systems

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-help mental wellness coach — daily journaling prompts + gratitude practice + emotional regulation tools + thought reframing สำหรับคนทั่วไป (ไม่ใช่ clinical therapy)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until the problem, requirements, goals, non-goals, and constraints are CONFIRMED, then deliver a single verdict — do, don't, cheaper alternatives, trade-offs, ordered checklist, success metrics. Required: the user wants exactly ONE recommendation — not options, not a debate — and their framing is open to challenge (advise may answer a different question than the one asked). Triggers on "what should I do about X", "advise me on X", "am I approaching this right", "is this the right move". Do NOT use to be interrogated with no recommendation (→ mk:grill) — advise also interviews one question at a time, but only to reach a verdict. Do NOT use when the framing is settled and only the options are open (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to decide whether something is worth building (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when you want several perspectives to argue it out (→ mk:party).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ideenschürf-Workflow für festgefahrene, schwere Probleme (Beweise, Forschungsfragen, hartnäckige Design-/Architekturprobleme): einen Ideenspeicher über acht Schürftechniken füllen (Wiedererkennung, Fern-Disziplin-Analogie, Alltags-Allegorie, Störgefühl/Ästhetik, Märchen-Reframing, Web-/Literatur-Recherche, Geschwisterprojekte, Bestandsquerlauf), dann gegen bereits Versuchtes filtern, eine Idee wählen und bis zur Substanz verfolgen. Nutze diesen Skill, wenn ein Problem trotz mehrerer Anläufe feststeckt, wenn „neue Ideen für X" gebraucht werden, bei „wir drehen uns im Kreis", oder für periodische Innovations-Läufe über ein Projekt. Für breites, freies Ideensammeln ohne festgefahrenes Problem stattdessen brainstorm (SCAMPER, Six Hats etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply repeatable dialogue MA, Studio-based or automatic portrait reframing, overlay-safe rendering, and loudness/sync QA to an existing interview or talking-head rough cut. Use when the user asks to make speech easier to hear, perform MA, enlarge or rebalance a person in frame, crop or punch in an interview, automatically propose framing, or prepare a finishing preview before final approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Change what something MEANS before you change what it IS — Rory Sutherland's cheapest lever. Use when a product, price, feature, or message is objectively fine but feels cheap, generic, boring, overpriced, or unjustified; when the user says 'how do we make this feel more premium/valuable/exciting', 'people don't get why it's worth it', 'how do we reposition/rename/repackage this', or wants to raise perceived value without changing the product or cutting the price. Covers renaming, recategorising, mental accounting (price framing), creating artificial value, and context-shifting. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談（「高いと言われる」「安っぽく見える」「値下げせずに高級感を出したい」）にも使う。中文咨询（“被说太贵”“显得廉价”“不降价也想显得高级”）也适用。

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitate idea generation sessions that actually produce diverse, useful options instead of degenerating into the first plausible answer. Use for product ideation, feature exploration, problem-reframing, naming, design alternatives, strategic option-generation, or any task where the failure mode is "we picked the obvious thing too fast." Covers solo and group sessions, divergence/convergence discipline, technique selection (SCAMPER, Crazy Eights, How Might We, 6-3-5 Brainwriting, Reverse Brainstorming, Worst Possible Idea, Random Stimulus), facilitation moves for handling dominant voices and groupthink, and structured convergence to a shortlist with rationale. Outputs a session artifact with options generated, evaluation, shortlist, and the rejected-but-interesting list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。