629 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for directory traversal", "exploit path traversal vulnerabilities", "read arbitrary files through web applications", "find LFI vulnerabilities", or "access files outside web root". It provides comprehensive file path traversal attack and testing methodologies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze dependencies for known security vulnerabilities and outdated versions. Use when auditing third-party libraries. Trigger with 'check dependencies', 'scan for vulnerabilities', or 'audit packages'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan systems and dependencies for CVEs and security vulnerabilities. Use tools like Nessus, OpenVAS, and Qualys to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities. Use when performing security assessments, compliance scanning, or vulnerability management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security code review for vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "security review", "find vulnerabilities", "check for security issues", "audit security", "OWASP review", or review code for injection, XSS, authentication, authorization, cryptography issues. Provides systematic review with confidence-based reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a security scan on a deployed Power Pages site, fetches the latest scan report, and produces a plain-language summary. Scans the live site's public surface for vulnerabilities and surfaces issues by severity. Use when the user wants to scan, check, test, audit, or assess a published site, find vulnerabilities on production, view the latest scan report, see previous scan results, run a security audit, or asks "how safe is my live site?", "is my site vulnerable?", "audit my production site" — even if they say "find issues" or "check for problems" without mentioning "scan" or "security".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate, modernize, and upgrade codebases to AWS. Run analysis on repos for tech debt, security vulnerabilities, and modernization opportunities. Transforms .NET Framework to .NET 8/10, mainframe COBOL to Java, VMware VMs to EC2, SQL Server to Aurora, and upgrades Java/Python/Node.js versions and AWS SDKs. Use when the user says "migrate .NET to AWS", "upgrade Java to 17/21", "modernize COBOL", "modernize mainframe", "move VMware to EC2", "convert SQL Server to Aurora", "upgrade Python version", "migrate AWS SDK", "transform this codebase", "analyze for issues", "find tech debt", "what tech debt", "security vulnerabilities", "CVEs", "what's wrong with my code", "assess my repos", "where do I start", "find what's outdated", "analyze my repos", "AWS Transform - continuous modernization", "continuous modernization" or "continuous-modernization". Don't use for infrastructure provisioning, CI/CD pipelines, or general coding tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find similar vulnerabilities and bugs across codebases using pattern-based analysis. Use when hunting bug variants, building CodeQL/Semgrep queries, analyzing security vulnerabilities, or performing systematic code audits after finding an initial issue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit project dependencies, frameworks, languages, and dev tools for known vulnerabilities, CVEs, and security anti-patterns. Use when the user mentions 'dependency audit,' 'npm audit,' 'CVE,' 'vulnerable packages,' 'supply chain security,' 'outdated dependencies,' 'known vulnerabilities,' 'security advisory,' 'package security,' 'framework vulnerability,' 'is this package safe,' or needs to check whether their stack has known security issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit applications for AI prompt injection, agent security, and LLM permission boundary vulnerabilities. Use when the user mentions 'prompt injection,' 'LLM security,' 'AI security,' 'jailbreak,' 'indirect prompt injection,' 'prompt leaking,' 'AI red team,' 'LLM vulnerabilities,' 'AI input validation,' 'system prompt extraction,' 'agent security,' 'MCP security,' 'AI permissions,' 'AI privilege escalation,' or needs to secure any application with AI features, AI agents, or LLM integrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the user asks to "review my code", "full code review", "review my changes", "check for bugs", "scan for bugs", "review correctness", "security audit", "find vulnerabilities", "review security", "check API usage", "verify against docs", "check for cross-file duplication", "review consistency", "check for code reuse", "review simplicity", "find untested code", "find redundant tests", or "review test coverage".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instruments code to track the flow of untrusted or sensitive data at runtime, enabling detection of injection vulnerabilities, data leaks, and privilege violations. Use when users need to: (1) Track untrusted input propagation through code, (2) Detect SQL injection, XSS, or command injection vulnerabilities, (3) Identify sensitive data leaks, (4) Monitor privilege escalation paths, (5) Perform dynamic taint analysis for security testing. Supports Python, Java, JavaScript, and C/C++ with configurable taint sources and sinks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Statically analyze code to detect security vulnerabilities including buffer overflows, injection risks (SQL, command, XSS), insecure deserialization, improper authentication, hard-coded credentials, and unsafe cryptography. Use when: (1) Performing security code review, (2) Analyzing code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, (3) Identifying CWE-classified weaknesses, (4) Generating security audit reports, (5) Reviewing code before deployment, or (6) Assessing third-party code security. Findings categorized by CWE ID and severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects security vulnerabilities by matching code against known vulnerability patterns, insecure coding idioms, and CVE-style patterns. Explains why patterns are risky and under what conditions they are exploitable. Use when analyzing code for security issues, reviewing for common vulnerabilities, or assessing exploitability of suspicious code patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze detected vulnerabilities to assess realistic exploitability by examining control flow, input sources, sanitization logic, and execution context. Use when users need to: (1) Determine if a vulnerability is actually exploitable in practice, (2) Assess severity and impact of security issues, (3) Prioritize vulnerability remediation, (4) Understand attack vectors and exploitation conditions, (5) Generate exploitability reports with proof-of-concept scenarios. Focuses on injection vulnerabilities (SQL, command, XSS, path traversal, LDAP) with detailed analysis of reachability, controllability, sanitization, and impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze CVE reachability in software repositories by examining how vulnerable dependencies are imported and used. Determines whether vulnerable components, classes, or functions are reachable from project code through call chain analysis, reflection detection, dynamic loading patterns, and configuration-gated behavior. Classifies each CVE as likely reachable, possibly reachable, or likely unreachable with supporting evidence. Use when analyzing security vulnerabilities in dependencies, performing post-disclosure CVE triage, assessing vulnerability impact, or when users ask to analyze CVE reachability, check if vulnerabilities are exploitable, or evaluate dependency security risks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes code to identify security-critical time intervals and timing vulnerabilities in authentication, authorization, and time-sensitive security operations. Use this skill when reviewing code for proper timeout enforcement, token expiration, session management, rate limiting, password reset validity, or any time-sensitive security mechanism. Detects missing expiration checks, excessive timeout values, lack of rate limiting, client-side only validation, hardcoded timeouts, and timing attack vulnerabilities. Triggers when users ask to check security timeouts, verify token expiration handling, audit session timeout implementation, review rate limiting, or analyze time-based security controls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for security vulnerabilities. Use when the user says 'security review', 'security audit', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'pentest the code', 'OWASP check', or any variation of wanting a security assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check Python environments and requirements files for published vulnerabilities before shipping, upgrading, or approving dependency changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks 'is my site secure', 'run a security audit', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'was my site hacked', or 'fix the vulnerable plugins'. Runs the Respira security audit, reads its indicators, coverage and known vulnerabilities honestly, never calls a partial scan clean, and fixes what it finds one approved step at a time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run security verification — SAST pattern scanning, DAST against a running app, OWASP Top 10 compliance, CVSS assessment, and adversarial code audit. Use before commit/push or when checking code for vulnerabilities. Trigger on "security scan", "is this vulnerable", "OWASP check", "security verify", "scan for vulnerabilities".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and exploit Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerabilities within web applications. Use this skill when testing web applications that render dynamic content using template engines like Jinja2 (Python), Twig (PHP), Freemarker (Java), or Pug (Node.js). Covers identification via mathematical evaluation, context mapping, escaping sandboxes, and achieving Remote Code Execution (RCE).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exploit PHP object serialization vulnerabilities (Insecure Deserialization). This skill details how to identify unserialize() injection points and construct malicious serialized objects using Property Oriented Programming (POP) chains to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exploit Mass Assignment vulnerabilities in APIs and web frameworks to inject unauthorized parameters. This skill details how attackers uncover hidden fields and manipulate JSON or HTTP bodies to elevate privileges or tamper with data logic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。