「alignment」の検索結果

Ranks skill matches by fit, performance history, and contextual relevance. Applies multi-factor scoring including success rate, resource usage, and task alignment. Activate on 'rank skills', 'best skill for', 'skill ranking', 'compare skills', 'optimal skill'. NOT for semantic matching (use dag-semantic-matcher) or skill catalog (use dag-skill-registry).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare for Anthropic-specific technical interviews covering Constitutional AI, RLHF, interpretability, scaling laws, MCP, agentic systems, and AI safety. Activate on "anthropic interview", "constitutional AI prep", "alignment interview", "safety interview", "RLHF opinion", "interpretability prep", "anthropic technical". NOT for general ML interview prep, system design interviews, coding challenges, or behavioral interview practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a written plan or design doc through a designer's lens before implementation - seven passes over information architecture, interaction states, emotional arc, AI-slop risk, design-system alignment, responsive and accessibility coverage, and unresolved decisions. Each dimension is rated 0-10 with an explicit statement of what would make it a 10, then the plan is edited to get there. Use when a plan has a UI surface and you want the design gaps closed before code is written. Not for auditing a live site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frontend UI design, critique, audit, polish. Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates internal communications for SMEs including employee newsletters, change announcements, town hall agendas, leadership updates, onboarding communications, and team alignment documents. Use when user asks about internal messaging, employee communications, town halls, leadership updates, culture communications, or team announcements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when revising or reviewing scientific, technical, or academic manuscripts, proposals, abstracts, reports, or related writing for precision, concision, logical cohesion, citation support, evidence alignment, and objective scholarly tone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finalize documentation changes for production readiness by discovering existing conventions, verifying code-doc alignment, reviewing format/terminology/tone consistency, verifying branch/worktree intent, and structuring clean commits with a post-publish branch/worktree cleanup decision. Counterpart of finalize-and-commit for documentation projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a README for accuracy, usability, and alignment with the actual repository. Detects invented content, broken setup steps, and structural issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, generating, or improving Pest tests for Laravel — clear intent, good coverage, maintainable structure, and alignment with project testing conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modelo de moderação especializado 7-8B do Meta para filtragem de entrada/saída de LLM. 6 categorias de segurança - violência/ódio, conteúdo sexual, armas, substâncias, automutilação, planejamento criminal. Precisão de 94-95%. Deploy com vLLM, HuggingFace, Sagemaker. Integra com NeMo Guardrails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Método da Anthropic para treinar IA inofensiva através de auto-aprimoramento. Abordagem em duas fases - aprendizado supervisionado com auto-crítica/revisão, depois RLAIF (RL from AI Feedback). Use para alinhamento de segurança, redução de outputs prejudiciais sem rótulos humanos. Alimenta o sistema de segurança do Claude.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ajuste fino de LLMs usando reinforcement learning com TRL - SFT para ajuste de instruções, DPO para alinhamento de preferências, PPO/GRPO para otimização de recompensas e treinamento de modelo de recompensas. Use quando precisar de RLHF, alinhar modelo com preferências ou treinar a partir de feedback humano. Funciona com HuggingFace Transformers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework de segurança em runtime da NVIDIA para aplicações LLM. Com detecção de jailbreak, validação de entrada/saída, verificação de fatos, detecção de alucinações, filtragem de PII, detecção de toxicidade. Usa DSL Colang 2.0 para rails programáveis. Pronto para produção, executa em GPU T4.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Code Quality] Use when you need to review integration tests for assertion quality, bug protection, repeatability, and test-spec traceability — AND verify the review target (changed production code) has test coverage (integration-first) with spec↔test↔code alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critically analyze whether a product, repo, skill, plugin, harness, or architecture vision still fits the real application, user intent, implementation, evidence, and likely future direction. Use when asked to assess vision vs application, predict future fit, critique roadmap direction, analyze strategic intent, or decide whether to keep, refine, pivot, or kill a plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design engineering principles for making interfaces feel polished. Use when building UI components, reviewing frontend code, implementing animations, hover states, shadows, borders, typography, micro-interactions, enter/exit animations, or any visual detail work. Triggers on UI polish, design details, "make it feel better", "feels off", stagger animations, border radius, optical alignment, font smoothing, tabular numbers, image outlines, box shadows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design engineering principles for making interfaces feel polished. Use when building UI components, reviewing frontend code, implementing animations, hover states, shadows, borders, typography, icons, micro-interactions, enter/exit animations, or any visual detail work. Supports quick and full review modes. Triggers on UI polish, design details, "make it feel better", "feels off", stagger animations, border radius, optical alignment, font smoothing, tabular numbers, image outlines, box shadows, icons, icon stroke weight, icon states, motion restraint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing quality guidelines, formatting conventions, and styling constraints for documentation. Trigger when: - Writing, editing, or auditing documentation files, READMEs, markdown files, or guides. - Modifying files with suffixes like: *.md, *.qmd, *.txt, *.rst. - Prompt contains keywords: doc, documentation, spelling, grammar, headers, links, table alignment, Divio, tone, voice, clarity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-directed review of git history for change coherence. Trigger when: - Analyzing project history, reviewing diffs, or checking commit messages for alignment. - Prompt contains: /git-review, git history, commit log, change coherence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

认知-工作对齐检查。验证你的实际工作产出是否可追溯到你的认知体系（L1.5原则 or L1文档），识别「漂浮工作」——有执行但无认知根的任务，输出对齐报告。触发词：「检查工作与认知的对齐」「认知根对齐」「这个工作有没有认知根」「认知体系和工作是否自洽」「认知对齐检查」「第四维健康检查」。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Culture assessment and monitoring with three modes — Diagnostic for a deep session surfacing the gap between declared culture and actual culture, Review for periodic check-ins on whether behavior is shifting, and Alert Triggers for setting tripwires around culture-strategy misalignment, regression, and integration risk. Not a culture change programme — a mirror. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about culture, values, team dynamics, how decisions really get made, why change efforts stall, merger integration, or whether the organisation can actually execute its strategy. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。