596 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
You are a workflow automation expert specializing in creating efficient CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, and automated development processes. Design and implement automation that reduces manual work, improves consistency, and accelerates delivery while maintaining quality and security.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in event sourcing, CQRS, and event-driven architecture patterns. Masters event store design, projection building, saga orchestration, and eventual consistency patterns. Use PROACTIVELY for event-sourced systems, audit trail requirements, or complex domain modeling with temporal queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness, consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or before implementation to verify project context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full review of a PR, a file, or pasted text against the OpenMetadata Writing Style Guide checklist, plus checking every checkable claim for internal consistency against the diff/PR itself. One combined report, not separate passes. Does not fetch or verify against any external source repository. Link-checking is out of scope; a separate broken-links job covers that. Only runs on explicit /content-review invocation, never self-triggered.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and optimize headings across AEM Edge Delivery Services pages for search intent, hierarchy, and consistency. Extracts all headings (H1-H6), evaluates uniqueness, keyword alignment, specificity, and structural correctness, then generates optimized heading suggestions per page. Use when improving on-page SEO, fixing heading hierarchy issues, or standardizing heading patterns across a site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code changes for correctness, consistency, performance, accessibility, and adherence to repo conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quick repo-hygiene and consistency checks before committing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review copy, content, and documentation for clarity, consistency, and correctness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review comment, JSDoc, TODO, README, and docs-to-code factual consistency, stale or low-value comments, and Chinese comment/variable appropriateness; do not use for general code review, broad documentation rewrites, or auto-editing comments without approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation) plus Cobra/Viper conventions where applicable. Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures VS Code workspaces with optimal settings, extensions, tasks, and debugging for team consistency. Use when users request "VS Code setup", "workspace settings", "team VS Code config", "editor configuration", or "devcontainer setup".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Elite mobile app image-generation skill for creating premium, app-native screen concepts and flows. Designed for iOS, Android, and cross-platform mobile products. Prioritizes clean hierarchy, comfortably readable text, strong multi-screen consistency, controlled color palettes, non-generic creative direction, textured surfaces, image-led composition, tasteful custom iconography, and clean phone mockup framing. By default, screens should be shown inside a subtle premium iPhone or similar phone mockup with a visible frame, while the main focus stays on the app content itself. This skill generates images only. It does not write code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unifies API response patterns across endpoints including pagination format, error structure, status codes, response envelopes, and versioning strategy. Provides contract documentation, shared TypeScript types, middleware utilities, and migration plan. Use when standardizing "API contracts", "response formats", "API conventions", or "API consistency".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking, leading), reduced-motion, or the design foundations (feedback, spatial consistency, restraint) behind Apple-style interfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defines caching strategies with cache keys, TTL values, invalidation triggers, consistency patterns, and correctness checklist. Provides code examples for Redis, CDN, and application-level caching. Use when implementing "caching", "performance optimization", "cache strategy", or "Redis caching".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Brand voice, visual identity, messaging frameworks, asset management, brand consistency. Activate for branded content, tone of voice, marketing assets, brand compliance, style guides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai. Generate a realistic-human, dialogue-driven short-drama clip — one shot, or a few hard-cut shots inside one job — from a script or scene description using the Ofox video API (Seedance 2.5). Runs a short creative brief when the input leaves beat, aspect ratio, emotional arc or camera register open (one held take, a travelling take, or a multi-shot cut list) ("Let the AI decide" is offered on the taste questions, never on a must-ask one, and never as the default), writes a structured prompt (header manifest, timestamped shots, quoted dialogue with delivery notes, consistency lock), shows a cost estimate, then calls ofox-video-core to submit, poll, download, and report the real cost. Use when a user asks to turn a script beat into video, e.g. "generate scene 3 of this script, two characters talking, 15 seconds", "make a vertical short-drama clip of these two arguing in a kitchen", "turn this dialogue into a 12-second video", or "give me a realistic short-drama shot of a couple breaking up at a train station". Do not use for silent product/brand shots (see seedance-ad-creative), for anime- or manga-styled scenes (see seedance-anime-drama), for one person addressing the viewer rather than another character — a script read from a supplied portrait is talking-head, an idea pulled out of an article is explainer — or for anything not involving people/dialogue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive quality verification: spec compliance, lint, type-check, tests, cross-layer data flow, code reuse, and consistency checks. Use when code is written and needs quality verification, before committing changes, or to catch context drift during long sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design or audit an agent identity, credential, session, continuity, and reputation plan. Use when attributed outcomes must survive key rotation, restart, recovery, or review; when choosing Elo, TrueSkill, a contextual bandit, or an LLM judge; and when making Sybil, newcomer, calibration, collusion, and evidence limits explicit. Produces a supplied-plan consistency audit, never proof of observed delivery, cryptographic identity, or live enforcement. NOT for proving personhood, global Sybil resistance, or an unobserved delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。