「iterative」の検索結果

Autonomously improve a generated paper via GPT-6-Astra xhigh review → implement fixes → recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user says "改论文", "improve paper", "论文润色循环", "auto improve", or wants to iteratively polish a generated paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teaches agents to iteratively build websites using Stitch with an autonomous baton-passing loop pattern

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative workflow to verify PDF page counts and adjust layout parameters until requirements are met

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively debug Excel structure with exploratory scripts before writing extraction logic

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over a Claude Code skill until a review comes back clean, with a cross-round findings ledger, escalation when fixes stop converging, and a mechanical scope guard. Reviews are performed by the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent. Use to fix skill quality issues, iteratively refine a skill, or resume a loop after an escalation ('fix my skill', 'improve this skill until it passes review', 'skill improvement loop'). NOT for a one-time review — use the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to co-author documentation, draft a proposal, write a technical spec, create a decision doc or RFC, or structure a substantial document through iterative collaboration and reader testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Max-3-cycle protocol for agent sub-tasks with WHY context and coordinator validation. Use when spawning sub-agents to complete scoped work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to co-author documentation, draft a proposal, write a technical spec, create a decision doc or RFC, or structure a substantial document through iterative collaboration and reader testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent C3 - Mixed Methods Design Consultant Comprehensive mixed methods research design specialist covering sequential, concurrent, embedded, and multiphase designs with Morse notation. Core Capabilities: - Sequential Explanatory (QUAN → qual): Explain quantitative results - Sequential Exploratory (QUAL → quan): Develop instruments - Convergent Parallel (QUAN + QUAL): Comprehensive understanding - Embedded (QUAN(qual)): Secondary strand addresses different question - Multiphase: Long-term projects with iterative phases - Morse notation interpretation and recommendation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collaboratively build and refine paper screening rubrics through brainstorming, test-driven development, and iterative feedback

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain and patch existing Lark/Feishu documents while preserving comments, highlights, citations, and newer remote edits. Use for iterative document updates, local-mirror sync, or durable project ownership; LoopX integration is optional.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize code performance through iterative improvements (max 2 rounds). Benchmark execution time and memory usage, compare against baseline implementations, and generate detailed optimization reports. Supports C++, Python, Java, Rust, and other languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative diagnose-and-fix workflow that repeatedly uses the diagnose skill to find a proven problem, plan the smallest credible improvement, implement it, re-diagnose, and continue until no useful fix remains or user intervention is required. Requires the diagnose skill; selected installs must also install diagnose. Use when asked to keep debugging, fix and verify, iterate until satisfied, improve after diagnosis, or run a diagnosis/fix/verification loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create publication-quality scientific diagrams using Nano Banana 2 AI with smart iterative refinement. Uses Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for quality review. Only regenerates if quality is below threshold for your document type. Specialized in neural network architectures, system diagrams, flowcharts, biological pathways, and complex scientific visualizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

工作流组合：当一个任务明显需要多件思想武器接力时，提供四种标准组合模式（新项目启动、复杂问题攻坚、方案迭代优化、阶段复盘），定义调用顺序、每步交接物和终止条件。触发信号包括从零启动、疑难攻坚、迭代优化、阶段复盘；单一 skill 就够用时不触发。 English: Workflow patterns. When a task clearly needs several skills in sequence, pick one of four standard patterns (project kickoff, hard-problem assault, iterative improvement, stage retrospective) that fix the order, the handoff artifact between steps, and the stop condition. Skip when a single skill suffices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-improving browser automation via the auto-research loop. Iteratively runs a browsing task, reads the trace, and improves the navigation skill (strategy.md) until it reliably passes. Supports parallel runs across multiple tasks using sub-agents. Use when you want to build or improve browser automation skills for specific website tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create publication-quality scientific diagrams using Nano Banana Pro AI with smart iterative refinement. Uses Gemini 3 Pro for quality review. Only regenerates if quality is below threshold for your document type. Specialized in neural network architectures, system diagrams, flowcharts, biological pathways, and complex scientific visualizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create professional infographics using Nano Banana Pro AI with smart iterative refinement. Uses Gemini 3 Pro for quality review. Integrates research-lookup and web search for accurate data. Supports 10 infographic types, 8 industry styles, and colorblind-safe palettes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LQF Machine Learning Expert Guide - Routed skill for ML/Statistical Modeling with Critical Discussion Mode. Triggers on: machine learning, modeling, prediction, training, classification, regression, clustering, deep learning, neural network, model evaluation, feature engineering, hyperparameter tuning, overfitting, underfitting, baseline, ablation study, critique my approach, review my model, is this a good idea, should I use, what's wrong with, evaluate my solution, challenge my assumptions, discuss my approach Engages in critical discussion with minimum 3 rounds of iterative refinement. Challenges both user proposals and own suggestions with fact-based critique. Demands evidence and baselines before accepting solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and run Holoscan Sensor Bridge example applications on a connected devkit. Filters available apps by the user's platform, HSB software version, board type, and sensors. Supports timed execution, failure analysis, code-edit suggestions, and iterative re-runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is measuring the host or DPU-CPU control-plane rate of a DOCA Flow pipeline with doca_flow_perf — picking a JSON policy from configs/, choosing the DPDK or DOCA backend, running the single-iteration smoke then the iterative eval loop, interpreting per-iteration CPU cycles and num_pushed / num_failed, or capturing the four-tuple (DOCA version, BlueField/firmware, JSON policy, worker/queue/burst config) that makes a Kops/sec number defensible. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "doca-flow-perf" — typical implicit phrasings include "how many rules per second can my BlueField insert", "5-tuple hairpin rule rate", "Kops/sec for steering", "flow-perf number does not match release notes", "DPDK vs DOCA benchmark", or "rule-install variance too high". Refuse and route elsewhere for optimizing a live Flow app (doca-flow-tune), the DPA-offloaded path (doca-flow-dpa-perf), dataplane throughput or latency, or library-internal pipe semantics — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate coding tasks to Codex, Claude Code, or Pi agents via background process. Use when: (1) building/creating new features or apps, (2) reviewing PRs (spawn in temp dir), (3) refactoring large codebases, (4) iterative coding that needs file exploration. NOT for: simple one-liner fixes (just edit), reading code (use read tool), thread-bound ACP harness requests in chat (for example spawn/run Codex or Claude Code in a Discord thread; use sessions_spawn with runtime:"acp"), or any work in ~/clawd workspace (never spawn agents here). Claude Code: use --print --permission-mode bypassPermissions (no PTY). Codex/Pi/OpenCode: pty:true required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms a rough idea into a detailed design document with implementation plan. Follows Prompt-Driven Development — iterative requirements clarification, research, design, and planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。