「qa」の検索結果

Manage QA release gates - go/no-go decisions, release sign-off reports, defect triage, and release readiness communication. Use this skill whenever a QA lead or manager needs to formally assess whether a build is ready to ship. Trigger on phrases like "release sign-off", "go or no-go", "is this ready to release", "defect triage", "release gate", "approve the release", "block the release", "release readiness", "quality gate", "sign off on this build", "triage these bugs", or any request to make or document a formal release decision. Also trigger when a release manager or PM asks "what's the QA status?" or "can we ship this?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spec-driven manual QA testing and Playwright E2E code generation. Orchestrates browser skills to navigate apps like a human tester, producing structured test reports or production-ready .spec.ts files. Always prompts user for credentials — never guesses or stores auth. Use for QA testing, E2E generation, login flow testing, or exploratory testing from a URL. NOT for AI-autonomous flows (see mk:agent-browser).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

実装済みサイトのデザイン品質を体系的にチェックする。配置・余白・比率・レスポンシブなどデザイン的な問題を検出し、修正は行わず問題のリストアップに集中する。 Trigger: デザインQA, デザインチェック, レイアウト確認, デザイン検証, 表示崩れ確認, /design-e2e-qa

OpenClaw全体の品質検証を継続し、不具合の再現から根本原因の修正、レビュー、反映確認まで進めます。実環境や負荷の検証結果を、再開可能な報告書に記録します。

• OpenClawの複数領域の不具合調査
• 回帰テストと独立レビューで修正を検証
• 実接続・UI・配布物の動作確認

QA-test a website or web app and return a 1-5 quality score (5 = flawless, 1 = broken) with evidence. Use when the user wants to test, QA, evaluate, score, or "check how good" a site, page, flow, or app — including a local dev server (e.g. "qa test localhost:5173", "does the checkout work?", "rate this landing page"). Drives a real Browser Use cloud browser, tunneling localhost automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle — qa-lead strategy and test plan, qa-tester case writing, execution, sign-off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare the current DevSpace checkout or worktree for isolated local manual QA. Use when the user asks to set up QA, test a worktree locally, try an experiment in ChatGPT, or reset the local QA environment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "set up conversion values so tROAS optimizes profit not orders", "map margin onto my purchase value", "build value rules for lead / phone / signup conversions", or "stop bidding to revenue when I care about profit"; defines and QAs the conversion VALUE model — per-conversion values, margin/net-value adjustment, static-vs-dynamic value rules, proxy values for non-revenue actions, and a value-vs-count sanity check — as a value-model spec plus a pre-launch value QA sheet. Not for whether the tag fires or UTMs are clean — use conversion-signal-qa; not for cross-platform double-count de-dup — use attribution-reconciler; not for scoring R1/R2 — that is a scored veto in ad-account-auditor. 付费广告转化价值建模/利润出价/价值规则QA

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report-only QA — same browser-based testing as qa but documents bugs with screenshots and repro steps only, no code changes. Health score formula weighted across 8 categories. Outputs to .gstack/qa-reports/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browser-based QA combining Chrome MCP control with Python analysis tools. Use when performing browser QA testing, visual regression tracking, WCAG accessibility auditing, performance profiling, or health-scoring web applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Explores the codebase in the background for context and domain language. Use when user wants to report bugs, do QA, file issues conversationally, or mentions "QA session".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Explores the codebase in the background for context and domain language. Use when user wants to report bugs, do QA, file issues conversationally, or mentions "QA session".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Explores the codebase in the background for context and domain language. Use when user wants to report bugs, do QA, file issues conversationally, or mentions "QA session".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author and maintain MANUAL and hybrid test cases and suites in TestRail, Xray (Jira), Zephyr Scale, and Qase. Covers test-case anatomy (title, preconditions, steps, expected results, test data), suite/section organization, bulk authoring from user stories and acceptance criteria, ambiguous-step linting, CSV/API import-export payloads per tool, requirement traceability and coverage gaps, review hygiene, and when a manual case should graduate to automation. Use when: "write a test case," "manual test case," "TestRail case," "Xray test," "Zephyr Scale case," "Qase case," "import CSV into TestRail," "lint these steps," "traceability report," "should this be automated." Not for: Generating automated TEST CODE — that is ai-test-generation. Sprint-level WHAT-to-test selection — that is test-planning. Related: ai-test-generation, test-planning, exploratory-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure and improve test coverage meaningfully. Covers Istanbul/V8/coverage.py configuration, coverage gap analysis by risk, coverage-as-ratchet in CI (never let it decrease), PR coverage diff checks, mutation testing for assertion quality, and distinguishing meaningful from vanity coverage. Use when: "code coverage," "coverage gap," "Istanbul," "coverage threshold," "coverage report," "branch coverage." Not for: writing the tests that raise coverage — use unit-testing; coverage as a tracked KPI trend over time — use qa-metrics. Related: unit-testing, ci-cd-integration, qa-metrics, ai-qa-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a whole regression suite and prune/restructure it with evidence: per-test coverage fingerprinting, AST near-duplicate clustering, CI-history mining for never-failing and flaky tests, prune decision rules (redundant/obsolete/low-value/keep), smoke/core/extended tiering by risk and defect-detection history, and a defensible "what we deleted and why" record. Deletion is destructive — quarantine and human sign-off are mandatory. Use when: "audit the test suite," "prune redundant tests," "find duplicate tests," "which tests can we delete," "restructure into smoke/core/extended," "is this test pulling its weight," "shrink the regression suite." Not for: Judging whether an individual test is WELL-WRITTEN (smells, assertions) — that is ai-qa-review. Healing one flaky test at runtime — that is test-reliability. Bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — that is selector-drift-recovery. Related: ai-qa-review, coverage-analysis, test-reliability, risk-based-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hybrid fingerprint + LLM pipeline for bug classification, deduplication, and ticket generation. Normalizes CI logs, creates stable fingerprints, clusters near-duplicates, then uses LLM for severity classification and ticket writing. Includes bug reporting templates and severity/priority matrix. Use when: "bug triage," "classify bugs," "failure analysis," "auto-classify," "CI failures," "bug report," "defect template." Not for: runtime self-healing of one flaky locator — use test-reliability. Not for: designing new tests from production telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: qa-metrics, qa-dashboard, ci-cd-integration, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run quokka's real-device E2E layer (QA strategy layer 5): drive the real qk binary against connected iPhone/Android devices through tmux, apply deterministic verifiers, and write a report. Use when the user asks to "run /qa", "run the device QA suite", "test against the real device", or before a release. Optionally finishes with an advisory exploratory UX pass (layer 6).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

株主総会の質疑応答のリハーサル台本（議長・株主・回答役員の読み上げ原稿）を、承認済みの想定問答から作り、Dataverse のリハーサル台本テーブルへ登録するスキル。 Use when ユーザーが「リハーサルの台本を作って」「QA-001〜QA-010 で読み上げ原稿を作って」「番号を言わない株主も入れた台本を作って」と依頼したとき。 Dataverse MCP コネクタ（describe / read_query / search_data / create_record / update_record）を使用する。削除・テーブル変更のツールは使わない。

Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for manual web, TUI, CLI, API and desktop QA. Triggers: smoke test, visual QA, screenshot check, CJK clipping, 수동 QA, 실제로 되는지 확인, 동작 확인, 직접 돌려봐.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes QA test cases created by $aif-qa in human-guided or automated-agent mode. Use when you need to walk through QA one case at a time, record pass/fail results, or have an agent verify cases through browser, CLI, API, automated tests, or file/document checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes QA test cases created by $aif-qa in human-guided or automated-agent mode. Use when you need to walk through QA one case at a time, record pass/fail results, or have an agent verify cases through browser, CLI, API, automated tests, or file/document checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。