「technology」の検索結果

Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level battery technology covering electrochemistry, lithium-ion battery physics, battery management systems, degradation mechanisms, and next-generation battery chemistries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook (Version 2022, OSD ManTech / Joint Service–Industry MRL Working Group). Use for assessing and managing manufacturing maturity and producibility risk in defense acquisition: the 10-level MRL scale and its non-linear, target-not-grade nature; the five demonstration environments (laboratory → production-relevant → production-representative → pilot line → production line); the nine manufacturing-risk threads and sub-threads; how MRL targets map onto Adaptive Acquisition Framework milestones (MRL 4/6/7/8/9); conducting an MRL Assessment; building a Manufacturing Maturation Plan; putting MRL maturity into contract language (Section L/M, SOW, AS6500A, DIDs); tailoring criteria for S&T, single-system, ship, sustainment, and industry contexts; and screening operational-technology cybersecurity. Manufacturing-readiness focused — it measures producibility risk and frames mitigation; it is NOT a technology-readiness (TRL) guide, a full systems-engineering process model, a cost-estimating or schedule guide, or a deep cybersecurity audit method (see sibling packs for those).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Library of accessibility personas representing people with various disabilities, impairments, and situational limitations. Use this skill when users ask about disability types, accessibility personas, user needs for specific conditions, how people with disabilities use technology, assistive technology users, or designing for accessibility. Triggers on requests about blindness, deafness, cognitive disabilities, motor impairments, low vision, screen readers, sign language, autism, ADHD, temporary disabilities, or any question about "how would a person with X use this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive technology-agnostic prompt generator for documenting end-to-end application workflows. Automatically detects project architecture patterns, technology stacks, and data flow patterns to generate detailed implementation blueprints covering entry points, service layers, data access, error handling, and testing approaches across multiple technologies including .NET, Java/Spring, React, and microservices architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive technology-agnostic prompt for analyzing and documenting project folder structures. Auto-detects project types (.NET, Java, React, Angular, Python, Node.js, Flutter), generates detailed blueprints with visualization options, naming conventions, file placement patterns, and extension templates for maintaining consistent code organization across diverse technology stacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technology-agnostic blueprint generator for creating comprehensive copilot-instructions.md files that guide GitHub Copilot to produce code consistent with project standards, architecture patterns, and exact technology versions by analyzing existing codebase patterns and avoiding assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert database architect specializing in data layer design from scratch, technology selection, schema modeling, and scalable database architectures. Masters SQL/NoSQL/TimeSeries database selection, normalization strategies, migration planning, and performance-first design. Handles both greenfield architectures and re-architecture of existing systems. Use PROACTIVELY for database architecture, technology selection, or data modeling decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the ECC engineering process retroactively against an existing project slice. Audit current state, reconstruct past decisions, produce a four-axis gap register (thinking, coding practice, missing features, technology selection), then execute fixes forward through the plan-TDD-review pipeline. Use when adopting ECC mid-project, taking over an inherited codebase, or asking what was missed and what would have been built differently from day one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

調査テーマを複数の問いに分け、ウェブ情報の検索と本文の読み込みを通じて、出典・確信度・情報不足を明記したレポートにまとめるスキル。

• 競合や市場動向を調べたいとき
• 導入前に技術を比較したいとき
• 市場規模や成長予測の調査

プロジェクトのコードや設定を根拠に、ECCのスキル・ルール・フックなどを常時読み込むものと必要時に参照するものへ分類し、導入計画と検証結果をまとめます。

• プロジェクトに合うECCを選びたいとき
• 常用スキルと参照用を分けたいとき
• 古いルールや非対応フックの整理

Web・iOS・Androidの画面を、読み上げやキーボード操作に対応させ、ラベル、配色、操作対象の大きさなどをWCAG 2.2に沿って設計・点検するスキル。

• アイコンボタンの説明を付けたいとき
• キーボード操作とモーダルの点検
• コントラストや操作対象の大きさの確認

Webページの表示や操作、APIの応答、ビルド・テストの所要時間を計測するスキル。変更前後の結果を比較し、Gitで共有する基準値をもとに性能の悪化を確認します。

• コード変更前後の性能比較
• ページが遅いという報告の調査
• 公開前に性能目標を確認したいとき

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Hide decorative elements from assistive technology. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant. If an image is clearly decorative, default to no finding unless the snippet shows an actual issue such as broken semantics, focusability, or visible layout instability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieves up-to-date documentation, API references, and code examples for any developer technology. Use this skill whenever the user asks about a specific library, framework, SDK, CLI tool, or cloud service — even for well-known ones like React, Next.js, Prisma, Express, Tailwind, Django, or Spring Boot. Your training data may not reflect recent API changes or version updates. Always use for: API syntax questions, configuration options, version migration issues, "how do I" questions mentioning a library name, debugging that involves library-specific behavior, setup instructions, and CLI tool usage. Use even when you think you know the answer — do not rely on training data for API details, signatures, or configuration options as they are frequently outdated. Always verify against current docs. Prefer this over web search for library documentation and API details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an accessibility expert specializing in WCAG compliance, inclusive design, and assistive technology compatibility. Conduct audits, identify barriers, and provide remediation guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chinese K-12 core-literacy course design for a single OpenMAIC classroom. Use when a teacher asks for 中小学课程、核心素养、素养导向、2022 课标、真实情境、任务群、表现性评价, or wants a grade-and-subject lesson designed around authentic tasks rather than content delivery. Covers Chinese, mathematics, languages, science, humanities, technology, arts, PE and labor education across primary, junior-high and senior-high stages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement WCAG 2.2 compliant interfaces with mobile accessibility, inclusive design patterns, and assistive technology support. Use when auditing accessibility, implementing ARIA patterns, building for screen readers, or ensuring inclusive user experiences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master systematic debugging techniques, profiling tools, and root cause analysis to efficiently track down bugs across any codebase or technology stack. Use when investigating bugs, performance issues, or unexpected behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test web applications with screen readers including VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS. Use when validating screen reader compatibility, debugging accessibility issues, or ensuring assistive technology support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create agent skills for Microsoft technologies using Learn MCP tools. Use when users want to create a skill that teaches agents about any Microsoft technology, library, framework, or service (Azure, .NET, M365, VS Code, Bicep, etc.). Investigates topics deeply, then generates a hybrid skill storing essential knowledge locally while enabling dynamic deeper investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migration and code evolution instructions generator for GitHub Copilot. Analyzes differences between two project versions (branches, commits, or releases) to create precise instructions allowing Copilot to maintain consistency during technology migrations, major refactoring, or framework version upgrades.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up complete GitHub Copilot configuration for a new project based on technology stack

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。