7,353 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Plan and diagnose FIPA-style ontology-service interactions while keeping declared ontology relations, provider capability, and application authorization separate. NOT for treating an ontology mapping as provider authority or guaranteed interoperability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for sensemaking, frame revision, anomaly handling, questioning strategy, and ambiguity diagnosis with the Data/Frame model before action is chosen. NOT for deterministic classification, settled execution planning, or situations where the frame is already stable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs, reconciles, and reviews an end-to-end Drydock program for safely staging agent runtimes: immutable worktree provenance, disposable VM containment, typed effect brokerage, global body accounting, resurrection, subscription-capacity economics, context compaction, operator control, evidence, and promotion. Use when several Drydock contracts must compose into one architecture, implementation hypertree, diagram set, or release plan. NOT for launching Port Daddy, running an untrusted subject, replacing focused containment/resurrection/capacity audits, or treating a design packet as runtime authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether a "current product focus receipt" (Decision/Now/Why-now/Evidence/Not-now/Cut-suspend/First-visible-proof/ Acceptance-gate/Kill-revisit-trigger/Owner/Review-date) and the work order it gates state a real, testable decision and a real agent launch — not planning-placeholder prose that sounds like an assignment but can't be proven. Use when deciding whether to launch an agent chain against a milestone or a stated "focus," when a work order lacks explicit input/output/owner/proof-gate, or when an acceptance gate would only prove a cached UI state instead of daemon truth. NOT for distinguishing roadmap items from energy-driven sidequests (legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), reviewing a PRD/prototype for product-completeness gaps like cold start or pricing (product-reality-reviewer), or accepting already-finished work against a personal acceptance bar (port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure persuasive speeches and formal arguments in forensic, legal, policy, and competitive debate styles. Use when the user needs to prepare talks, opening or closing arguments, policy pitches, public explanations, debate speeches, or mentions 'forensic speech', 'formal argument', 'persuasive speech structure', 'debate speech', 'opening statement', 'closing argument'. Turns structured claims into audience-tuned persuasive delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced CV for infrastructure inspection including forest fire detection, wildfire precondition assessment, roof inspection, hail damage analysis, thermal imaging, and 3D Gaussian Splatting reconstruction. Expert in multi-modal detection, insurance risk modeling, and reinsurance data pipelines. Activate on "fire detection", "wildfire risk", "roof inspection", "hail damage", "thermal analysis", "Gaussian Splatting", "3DGS", "insurance inspection", "defensible space", "property assessment", "catastrophe modeling", "NDVI", "fuel load". NOT for general drone flight control, SLAM, path planning, or sensor fusion (use drone-cv-expert), GPU shader development (use metal-shader-expert), or generic object detection without inspection context (use clip-aware-embeddings).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Schema design, normalization decisions, indexing strategies, and migration safety for relational databases. Use when designing tables, choosing between normalize vs denormalize, selecting index types, planning zero-downtime migrations, or setting up connection pooling. Activate on "schema design", "normalization", "denormalization", "foreign key", "index strategy", "migration", "connection pooling", "composite key", "surrogate key", "soft delete", "polymorphic association". NOT for PostgreSQL-specific query tuning or EXPLAIN analysis (use postgresql-optimization), NoSQL or document database design, or cloud database provisioning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chooses and designs developer surfaces for an agentic product: SDK, CLI, MCP, GUI, API, webhooks, and pd tube-style listener/sender workflows. Use when deciding why a user belongs in an SDK versus CLI/MCP/GUI, planning Python SDK parity, or making agent invocation easy across languages. NOT for implementing the full SDK, generic API docs, or UI visual design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply recognition-primed decision making to agents operating under time pressure, uncertainty, and ambiguous cues. Use for situation assessment, RPD-style action selection, and decision-support design in operational settings. NOT for batch optimization, static planning with full information, or tasks where exhaustive search is cheap and harmless.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organizing digital life for legacy, emergency access, and death preparedness. Specializes in password management, account documentation, digital asset preservation, and ensuring loved ones can access what they need.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply recognition-primed decision making to agents operating under time pressure, uncertainty, and ambiguous cues. Use for situation assessment, RPD-style action selection, and decision-support design in operational settings. NOT for batch optimization, static planning with full information, or tasks where exhaustive search is cheap and harmless.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ranks eligible skill candidates with explicit retrieval evidence, capability coverage, and uncertainty. NOT for discovery, authorization, or execution planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The intelligence layer of Jury-rig. Decomposes natural language tasks into proposed Hierarchical Task DAGs (HTDAGs), matches subtasks to skills, proposes wave and revision contracts, and expands nodes only when evidence supports a revised graph. Use for 'orchestrate', 'execute DAG', 'parallel agents', 'decompose task', 'coordinate skills'. NOT for single-skill tasks or simple linear workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Handle mental health crisis situations in AI coaching safely. Use when implementing crisis detection, safety protocols, emergency escalation, or suicide prevention features. Activates for crisis keywords, safety planning, hotline integration, and risk assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and validate versioned DAGs with typed dependencies, gates, and evidence-bound readiness. NOT for executing a DAG, granting work authority, or treating an unverified gate as cleared.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit LLM token cost estimates against actual API usage. Activate on 'cost verification', 'token estimate accuracy', 'API cost audit', 'estimation variance'. NOT for pricing lookups, budget planning, or cost optimization strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose, compare, and decompose work into the right coordination topology: dag, workflow, manager-driven team, swarm, blackboard, team-builder, or recurring loop. Use when the coordination shape is unclear, when you need topology-native breakdown instructions instead of a generic DAG, or when planning topology and runtime topology may differ. NOT for actual execution, node-level skill matching, or framework/tool installation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design an individual agent's belief, goal, intention, and reconsideration model. Use when specifying autonomous decision state, commitment policy, or recovery from failed plans. NOT for AgentSpeak interpreter mechanics, organization modeling, normative conflicts, or multi-agent execution waves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Own whether a multi-document product-architecture binder is internally consistent, complete against its stated customer/contingency/architecture coverage, and honest about which older product ambitions it has absorbed, superseded, deferred, contradicted, orphaned, or rejected. Use when running a binder Architect of Record pass, before an implementation chain cites a binder chapter as ready, when a proof-gate owner is missing, or when reconciling the binder against the older ambition corpus (website, plans, examples, ADRs). NOT for auditing a single Claude Skill bundle's structure or frontmatter (use skill-hygiene), rendering a single-PM accept/reject verdict on one finished deliverable (use port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review), or sequencing/stewarding a roadmap's sidequests once a gap or operator decision has been surfaced (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan or audit the cross-layer Harbor cooperative editor: Loro replicas for humans and agents, governed edit claims, salvage authority, and transport across shared, LAN, and remote harbors. Use when a change spans editor collaboration, identity, recovery, or transport contracts. For a single GPUI pane use gpui-rust-console; for motion use rust-gpui-motion; for a shader use gpui-shaders. NOT for non-collaborative screens, web editors, or generic Rust development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Introduce people to AI, agentic AI, and AI skills with appropriate pedagogy for any audience. Covers LLM analogies, progressive complexity paths, aha-moment demos, audience-tailored explanations, workshop design, and overcoming emotional barriers to AI adoption. Activate on 'explain AI', 'introduce AI', 'AI workshop', 'AI demo', 'teach AI', 'AI literacy', 'onboard to AI', 'AI evangelism', 'explain agentic', 'explain skills to', 'AI training session', 'AI onboarding'. NOT for teaching ML engineering (use ai-engineer), not for building AI features (use ai-engineer), not for prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer), not for building training data pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discipline an AI agent needs to work an issue/task tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues) as the shared source of truth: pull the right next item instead of inventing work, search before creating to avoid duplicates, write actionable items with checkable acceptance criteria, keep status transitions honest, and link work to items via branches/PRs/commits so progress is legible. Use when an agent picks up tracker work, files a new issue, updates status, or closes an item. NOT for authoring the PR itself (use agent-pr-authoring), roadmap-level planning and prioritization (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), or the mechanics of multiple agents coordinating on the same codebase (use multi-agent-coordination).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。