「consensus」の検索結果

Provider-agnostic multi-LLM deliberation. Three phases — independent responses, cross-model anonymized ranking, chairman synthesis. Credentials come from explicit plugin configuration or pro-workflow-specific CLI variables. Persists transcript to a wiki page when --wiki <slug> is passed. Use when the user wants multiple AI perspectives, consensus-building, or the "LLM Council" approach for high-stakes reviews, plan critique, or contested learning rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design data systems by understanding storage engines, replication, partitioning, transactions, and consistency models. Use when the user mentions "database choice", "which database should I use", "SQL or NoSQL", "replication lag", "partitioning strategy", "consistency vs availability", "stream processing", "ACID transactions", "eventual consistency", "my queries are slow at scale", or "data is inconsistent across replicas". Also trigger when choosing a datastore, designing data pipelines, or debugging distributed-system consistency issues. Covers data models, batch/stream processing, and distributed consensus. For system design, see system-design. For resilience, see release-it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial dual-model code review that runs two AI models in parallel, cross-references findings, and produces a consensus severity table with fix confidence ratings. Use when asked for a thorough code review, adversarial review, dual-model review, confidence-rated review, or 'Hanselman review'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Machine learning toolkit for genomic interval (BED) data; use it when you need to tokenize BED collections and train embeddings for regions/cells/labels, build consensus peak universes, or run similarity search and downstream ML on chromatin accessibility datasets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating startups through a Founders Fund-style lens: contrarian conviction, hard tech, bold product ambition, non-consensus markets, and high-upside company building.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating Michael Burry-style contrarian, asymmetric, unpopular trades: deep mispricing, short theses, complex assets, forced consensus errors, and catalyst-driven downside/upside.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent swarm formation and coordinated execution with topology-aware agent deployment, consensus protocols, and anti-drift enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive multi-perspective review using specialized judges with debate and consensus building

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate solutions through multi-round debate between independent judges until consensus

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull company financials, SEC filings, and analyst consensus for a public company. Use this skill whenever the user says "10-K", "10-Q", "earnings", "revenue of", "financials for", "analyst rating for", "price target for", or provides a stock ticker. Combines SEC EDGAR for official filings with Yahoo Finance / TipRanks for analyst data. Search + scrape only; no interact needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three modes for CS-conference papers (CVPR/ICCV/ECCV vision, ACL/EMNLP/NAACL NLP, ICLR/NeurIPS/ICML/AAAI ML). DIRECT-EDIT mode (common): the user describes a change in Chinese or English and the manuscript (LaTeX or Markdown) is edited directly through a CS-venue writing toolkit with author sign-off (use for 改这段 / 把中文想法写成 latex / polish / de-AI / translate / compress a passage). REVIEW mode (occasional, pre-submission): harden the paper through an adversarial courtroom review engine (N holistic domain reviewers / contestability routing / two-sided trial / three-way verdict / clerk-converged multi-round loop) with consensus-gated, author-signed revisions (use for review / critique / 审稿 / 评审 / mock-review). AUTO mode (unattended, opt-in via /goal): run the review-revise loop toward a verifiable goal, applying safe fixes under a drift-bounded policy and queueing risky ones. Resolves all inputs at runtime, no hardcoded paths. Not a from-scratch drafter (use ml-paper-writing) and not an official-venue rebuttal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assembles microbial-community sequencing into metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) with metaFlye (ONT), metaSPAdes/MEGAHIT (Illumina), and hifiasm-meta/metaMDBG (PacBio HiFi), then recovers genomes via multi-binner consolidation (MetaBAT2, MaxBin2, CONCOCT, SemiBin2, VAMB -> DAS_Tool) and QCs them against MIMAG with CheckM2, GUNC, and GTDB-Tk. Covers why a metagenome is not a genome (uneven coverage, micro-diversity, strain collapse to consensus), differential-coverage binning, co-assembly vs per-sample, the rRNA-operon collapse that fails short-read MAGs, and strain resolution with inStrain. Use when reconstructing genomes from a microbiome, soil, ocean, or gut community, recovering MAGs, or resolving strain-level variation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs set operations on genomic intervals - intersect (-wa/-wb/-wo/-wao/-loj/-c/-v/-u), subtract (-A), merge (-d, -c/-o), complement, cluster, multiinter, unionbedg, map, and groupby - with bedtools (CLI) and pybedtools/pyranges/bioframe (Python). Covers the sorted-input contract and the -sorted chromosome-order footgun, reciprocal/fractional overlap (-f/-F/-r/-e) and the A-vs-B asymmetry, -split for spliced/BED12/BAM features, and jaccard/fisher as mechanics only. Use when finding overlapping or unique regions between BED/peak/feature files, building consensus peaksets, removing blacklisted regions, transferring annotation values onto intervals, or computing interval-set similarity; route overlap-significance testing to overlap-significance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assembles genomes de novo from noisy long reads (Oxford Nanopore R9/R10/Dorado, PacBio CLR) with Flye (repeat graph), Canu (correct-trim-assemble OLC), NextDenovo, Shasta, Raven, wtdbg2, or miniasm, and reconciles bacterial assemblies into a consensus with Trycycler/Autocycler. Covers matching the input flag to the basecaller era (--nano-hq vs --nano-raw), why a raw long-read assembly is contiguous but low-QV and not finished until polished, haplotig false-duplication and purge_dups, coverage and read-N50 as non-substitutable inputs, and mid-read adapter de-chimerization. Use when assembling a bacterial or eukaryotic genome from ONT or PacBio noisy reads, choosing a long-read assembler, or diagnosing an over-collapsed or duplicated assembly. For PacBio HiFi use hifi-assembly instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects focal chromatin loops (point interactions / corner-dots) in balanced Hi-C and Micro-C contact maps and aggregates/validates a loop set. Covers de-novo calling with cooltools dots (HiCCUPS-style 4-background local enrichment with lambda-chunked FDR), chromosight (template-correlation), and Mustache (scale-space blob detection); aggregate peak analysis (APA) via cooltools pileup for confirmation; the depth/resolution prerequisite (de-novo needs ~5-10kb resolution = hundreds of millions to billions of valid pairs); consensus across callers and convergent-CTCF support as validation; and differential loops via union anchors plus chromosight quantify. Use when calling chromatin loops or dots from a cooler, deciding whether a map is deep enough to call de-novo vs running APA on known CTCF/cohesin anchors, building an aggregate peak pileup, comparing loops across conditions, or validating loop calls. For HiChIP/PLAC-seq/PCHi-C protein-anchored data use FitHiChIP/MAPS, not dots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Treats a ctDNA assay as a molecule-counting experiment at the Poisson edge and builds its analytical-validation case the measurement-science way. Covers the genome-equivalent currency (~330 haploid copies/ng), the lambda = input_GE x VAF sampling ceiling (lambda>=3 for ~95% detection), the error-suppression ladder (raw NGS ~1e-3 -> single-strand UMI ~1e-4/1e-5 -> duplex <1e-7), the CLSI EP17 LoB/LoD/LoD95/LoQ framework, the per-locus-vs-panel-integrated LoD distinction that lets bespoke MRD reach ppm, contrived/SEQC2 reference standards, and honest LoD reporting conditioned on input mass + consensus depth + replicate detection rate. Use when stating or trusting a sensitivity claim, designing a dilution-series validation, deciding how many genome equivalents are needed at a target VAF, choosing a single-locus vs panel-integrated LoD, or auditing a "detects 0.1% VAF" claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calls m6A peaks from MeRIP-seq / m6A-seq paired IP-vs-input data using exomePeak2 (transcript-aware, GC-bias-corrected Poisson GLM), MeTPeak (HMM over sliding windows), MACS3/MACS2 with --nomodel --broad --keep-dup all (genome-wide broad alternative), and DRACH motif enrichment via HOMER or ggseqlogo as a sanity check (NOT a filter). Covers BED12 vs narrowPeak output, exonic vs intronic peak handling, multi-tool reconciliation (intersection vs union), the m6A-vs-m6Am ambiguity at 5'UTR peaks that antibody methods cannot resolve, and orthogonal validation (miCLIP/GLORI/m6A-SAC-seq/m6Anet). Use when calling peaks from paired IP/input genome BAMs, choosing exomePeak2 (transcript-aware default) vs MACS3 (broad genomic) vs MeTPeak (HMM-smoothed low-coverage), confirming DRACH enrichment as a sanity check on the peak set, reconciling differing peak sets across tools, validating MeRIP peaks against single-base methods, interpreting 5' peaks where m6Am contamination is possible, or recommending a consensus strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assigns pathogen lineages (SARS-CoV-2 Pangolin UShER mode; Nextclade clade + QC; pango-designation alias resolution) and tracks variant frequencies over time using Nextstrain (Augur + Auspice), wastewater deconvolution (Freyja, COJAC, alcov, lineagespot), lineage-fitness modelling (multinomial logistic), and recombinant detection (3SEQ, RDP4, Bolotie). Covers Pangolin pangolin-data and Nextclade dataset version pinning (mandatory; lineage-defining mutations change with dataset), Freyja barcode forward-only date constraint, ARTIC primer scheme churn (V3/V4/V4.1/V5.3.2/Midnight) with dropout regions, and recombinant X-prefix designation lag. Use when assigning Pango lineages and Nextclade clades to viral consensus sequences, building Nextstrain Augur surveillance pipelines, deconvolving wastewater into lineage frequencies with Freyja, tracking lineage frequencies over time, handling ARTIC primer dropouts, or running surveillance for SARS-CoV-2/influenza/Mpox/RSV/H5N1/measles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull pre-computed ortholog calls from public databases (OrthoDB, Ensembl Compara, OMA browser, eggNOG, PANTHER, KEGG Orthology, HomoloGene) via their REST APIs. Use when orthologs are already curated upstream, when the question is "what is the X ortholog of Y" rather than "how to infer orthology de novo", when batch-mapping gene IDs across species, or when comparing the resources for consensus calls. Encodes confidence-level semantics, 1:1 vs 1:many vs many:many, HomoloGene deprecation, and when to defect to de novo computation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query protein-protein and gene interaction databases (STRING, BioGRID, IntAct, SIGNOR, Reactome, HuRI, HuMAP, OmniPath, ConsensusPathDB, DIP). Use when building PPI networks, choosing between physical vs functional vs genetic interactions, signed/directed vs undirected, high-throughput vs curated, picking confidence thresholds, aggregating across resources, or navigating license constraints. Encodes the database decision matrix, STRING v12 channel semantics, OmniPath as meta-database, SIGNOR for signed signaling, and per-resource rate limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Call accessible chromatin regions from ATAC-seq BAM files using MACS3, MACS2, Genrich, or HMMRATAC. Use when identifying open chromatin from aligned ATAC-seq, choosing between point-source vs HMM peak callers, applying ENCODE-style pseudoreplicate IDR, removing blacklist regions, or fixing 501bp consensus peaks for downstream differential analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify differentially accessible chromatin regions across conditions using DiffBind, csaw, DESeq2, or edgeR. Use when comparing ATAC-seq accessibility between treatment groups, choosing between consensus-peak vs sliding-window approaches, picking the correct normalization (full library vs reads-in-peaks), correcting batch with SVA/RUVseq, or interpreting log2FC and FDR thresholds in a chromatin context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process and analyze single-cell ATAC-seq data with Signac, ArchR, SnapATAC2, or Cell Ranger ATAC. Use when handling 10X scATAC or 10X Multiome (paired RNA+ATAC) data, performing per-cell QC, choosing between ArchR/Signac/SnapATAC2 ecosystems, building per-cluster consensus peaksets, integrating with paired scRNA-seq, doublet detection (AMULET vs ArchR vs scDblFinder), or running pseudobulk differential accessibility per cluster.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an automated codex⇄Claude debate to consensus — no round cap, no deadlock exit. Two explicit subcommands. `review` (also the bare/back-compat default) — codex (reviewer) critiques the current diff and a Claude subagent (author) fixes/disputes, looping until they agree. `answer` — Claude and codex each answer a freeform prompt in parallel, then cross-check until they agree, and a unified answer is returned. Use when the user types `/codex-debate`, asks to "have codex review this", "run the codex debate", "review this PR with codex", "argue this with codex until you agree", or passes a question to "have Claude and codex debate/answer until they agree".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。