Design a delivery team's communication system — channel routing, meeting-load reduction, status structure, escalation SLAs, timezone norms. Use when the calendar is full, updates go unread, or blockers surface late.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
537 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Design a delivery team's communication system — channel routing, meeting-load reduction, status structure, escalation SLAs, timezone norms. Use when the calendar is full, updates go unread, or blockers surface late.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate templated responses for common legal inquiries with escalation detection. Use when drafting legal responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured legal risk assessment with 5x5 Severity x Likelihood matrix. Use for risk scoring, risk registers, escalation decisions, and risk memos.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Determines whether a specific AI-agent action, output, recommendation, or proposed commitment remains admissible for execution or institutional reliance under current authority, delegated scope, evidence, facts, policy, risk, escalation, and revocation conditions. Use this Skill before an enterprise or regulated AI agent executes, updates records, triggers workflows, communicates externally, or before an institution relies on an agentic output in a way that creates consequence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for an incident response plan, IRP, escalation matrix or incident playbook. Writes an offline HTML plan with severities, escalation contacts and comms; DR restores service, IRP runs the incident.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, run, and improve a Security Operations Center — alert prioritization, runbook authoring, escalation criteria, on-call structure, alert tuning workflow, MTTD / MTTR / fidelity KPIs, analyst tiering, and shift handoffs. Use when the user mentions 'SOC,' 'security operations,' 'SOC analyst,' 'alert triage workflow,' 'runbook,' 'escalation,' 'on-call,' 'SOC tiering,' 'tier 1 / tier 2,' 'MTTD,' 'MTTR,' 'alert fatigue,' 'alert tuning,' 'shift handoff,' 'SOAR,' or wants to design or improve a security operations team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply price escalation to CWICR estimates over time. Calculate inflation adjustments, material price indices, and labor rate increases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses decision reversibility and risk at critical checkpoints. Use when a workflow reaches a high-stakes branch needing escalation check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess whether to escalate models. Use when evaluating reasoning depth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous sub-agent hand-off for a fiddly, fully-specified exploit-compile / escalation RUN - the main agent stays on strategy and the board while a cheap sub-agent runs an exact copy-paste checklist behind a false-root/hostname guardrail. Use for "delegate", "offload", "hand this to a sub-agent", "spin a haiku", or the moment a foothold plus a working escalation vector is identified. Main agent dispatches, waits (no parallel duplicate), integrates the result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Local Windows privilege escalation on a STANDALONE / workgroup host, or a local shell on a domain member - foothold to SYSTEM. Token privileges (SeImpersonate/Potato), service misconfig (weak perms / unquoted path / writable binary), registry autologon creds, scheduled-task + writable-script abuse, DLL hijack, AlwaysInstallElevated, UAC bypass, credential loot. For DOMAIN escalation (kerberoast/DCSync/ADCS/BloodHound) use hunt-ad instead. Wiki-first, FIND schema output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the Art. 36 prior consultation process when a DPIA indicates high residual risk that cannot be mitigated. Covers required documentation per Art. 36(3), the 8-week DPA response timeline, outcome management, and interaction protocols with supervisory authorities. Keywords: prior consultation, Art. 36, supervisory authority, DPA, high residual risk, DPIA escalation, consultation documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Better Stack (formerly Better Uptime + Logtail) is an observability platform that combines uptime monitoring, log management, incident response with on-call escalation, and status pages. Use when a user asks to set up uptime monitors or heartbeat monitoring for cron jobs, create escalation policies, send logs with @logtail/node or the Pino transport, manage Better Stack through its API or Terraform provider, or publish status page updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Restructure and optimize alert rules for monitoring platforms (Sentry, PagerDuty, Datadog, OpsGenie). Use when someone asks to "reduce alert noise", "fix alert fatigue", "create alert rules", "set up escalation policies", "tune alerting thresholds", or "create on-call runbooks". Generates platform-specific alert configurations and tiered escalation policies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive escalation-resolution workflow for the bmad-loop orchestrator. A bmad-loop run paused on a CRITICAL escalation (a contradiction or gap a dev/review session could not safely resolve alone); you and the human disambiguate the frozen spec so the story can be re-driven. Invoked as /bmad-loop-resolve <story-key>. Unlike the automated dev/review sessions this session is interactive — a human is present and you SHOULD ask.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖:(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读);(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测);(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts);(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申);(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo);(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解:误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化:不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You launched an ambassador program. 3 applications. One ghosted after week 2. Should you lower the bar? Offer more perks? Spam influencers? This gives you the complete community & ambassador operations SOP — from pre-launch checklist to recruitment to tiered management to retention to governance. Built from Notion (20M users, real ambassador interviews), AFFiNE (60K stars), Asana, and ClickUp programs. By @WeiYipei. What's inside: • Pre-launch readiness checklist (6 conditions that must be true before starting) • 6-step community setup SOP (platform selection → rules → admin standards → monitoring → wiki → metrics) • Ambassador recruitment system (A+B qualification, application form design, scoring rubric) • 4-tier progression system (Bronze → Silver → Gold → Platinum with point thresholds) • 5-pillar incentive framework (Product quality → Beta access → Founder access → KOL path → Full engagement) • Churn early-warning system + retention playbook • Event operations SOP (6 event types × full lifecycle) • Health metrics dashboard (6 core KPIs + 5 ambassador-specific indicators) • Governance & risk control (behavior code, escalation matrix) • Real templates: recruitment post, welcome email, annual calendar 🇨🇳 你搞了个大使计划。来了3个申请。一个第二周就消失了。该降门槛?加福利?群发KOL?这份SOP给你从启动前置条件到招募到留存到治理的完整社区/大使运营方法论。基于 Notion(2000万用户,大使真实访谈)、AFFiNE(60K stars)、Asana、ClickUp 实战案例。 🇯🇵 アンバサダープログラムを立ち上げた。応募3件。1人は2週間で消えた。基準を下げる?特典を増やす?このSOPは、事前チェックリストから採用、段階管理、リテンション、ガバナンスまでの完全なコミュニティ&アンバサダー運営フレームワークを提供します。Notion(2000万ユーザー)、AFFiNE(60K stars)の実例から構築。 🇰🇷 앰배서더 프로그램을 시작했습니다. 지원 3건. 하나는 2주 만에 사라졌습니다. 기준을 낮출까요? 이 SOP는 사전 체크리스트부터 모집, 단계별 관리, 리텐션, 거버넌스까지 완전한 커뮤니티 & 앰배서더 운영 프레임워크를 제공합니다. Notion(2000만 사용자), AFFiNE(60K stars) 실전 사례에서 구축. Triggers: "ambassador program" | "community building" | "community management" | "DevRel" | "developer relations" | "community growth" | "大使计划" | "社区运营" | "社区搭建" | "コミュニティ運営" | "アンバサダー" | "커뮤니티 운영" | "앰배서더" | "open source community" | "user retention"
Design drift alerts and escalation — thresholds, runbooks, and retrain triggers. Use when asked to "alert on model drift", "when should we retrain", or "write a drift escalation runbook".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query and manage PagerDuty — find out who's on call, list and manage incidents, read escalation policies and schedules, trace who got paged and why, acknowledge/resolve/snooze/escalate incidents, and create or update services. Use this whenever the user mentions PagerDuty, on-call, paging, escalation, an incident ID like `PXXXXXX` or `Q...`, asks "who's on call", "page the on-call", "ack this incident", "why wasn't I paged", or pastes a pagerduty.com URL — even if they don't say "API". Always start from this skill when interacting with this service — its bundled scripts and recipes are the fastest path.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Uses boto3 and the AWS IAM Access Analyzer API to enumerate all roles, policies, and users, then flags permission combinations that could allow privilege escalation to AdministratorAccess. Outputs findings mapped to MITRE ATT&CK TA0004 with remediation steps and least-privilege replacement policy JSON.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cultivate defensive situational awareness, threat assessment, and mental clarity under pressure. Covers the Cooper color code awareness system, body language reading and intent detection, verbal de-escalation, moving mindfulness in public spaces, combat focus and the OODA loop, rapid grounding techniques for acute stress, context-specific integration, and ongoing review and refinement of awareness skills. Use when entering unfamiliar or potentially hostile environments, needing to assess a situation for safety, de-escalating a verbal confrontation, or integrating awareness practice into daily movement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design sustainable on-call rotations with balanced schedules, clear escalation policies, fatigue management, and handoff procedures. Minimize burnout while maintaining incident response coverage. Use when setting up on-call for the first time, scaling a team from 2-3 to 5+ engineers, addressing on-call burnout or alert fatigue, improving incident response times, or after a post-mortem identifies handoff issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants a Chinese adult-oriented turn-based text GalGame GM with harem formation, freeform narrative roleplay, natural-escalation yellow-fiction text adventure, multi-character relationship drama, story memory, or novel export. Trigger on requests for 后宫养成, 后宫, 养成, 多女主, 多男后宫, 黄色爽文, 自然流YY文字游戏, 成人向文字冒险, 回合制文字冒险, GalGame, 后宫互动, 逐步升温剧情, 暧昧开局, 自定义身份卡, 文档记忆, 小说导出, 女性向剧情, or any Chinese freeform narrative game where the user wants adult consenting characters, gradual escalation, strong character routes, and long-running continuity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform triangulated cognitive research combining SQLite memory, GitHub 10k+ stars patterns, and ToT DAG benchmarking before critical architectural decisions. Automatically triggers subagent research escalation when confidence is low (<0.70). Keywords: research, benchmark, github, memory, triangulation, grounding, best-practices, escalation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。