「protocol」の検索結果

Interact with the BNB Chain Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. Use to query DeFi data, get token prices, search documentation, fetch git diffs, and retrieve smart contract source code on BNB Chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agents can sign plugins, rotate credentials without losing identity, and publicly attest to behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous benchmarking of multi-agent coordination systems: experiment design, statistical analysis, human evaluation protocols, and reproducible reporting. NOT FOR ML model evaluation (use llm-evaluation-harness), A/B testing for web products, survey design, or general data science.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interpret and design bounded FIPA communicative-act exchanges using XC00037H semantics while keeping delivery, authority, and external effects separate. NOT for proving delivery, task authorization, or external effect completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture-level decisions for putting a CDN in front of a web app's static assets, API responses, and file/media delivery: provider selection (hyperscaler vs. specialist $/GB), signed-URL / tokenized access for gating private content at the edge, cache invalidation strategy (versioned URLs vs. purge APIs), origin shield / tiered caching for high-miss-rate content, and CDN-layer geo-restriction. Use when deciding which CDN to put in front of a new or growing service, when private/paywalled files need edge delivery without an origin round-trip per request, or when purge/invalidation behavior is being designed rather than debugged. NOT for HTTP cache-control header syntax, Vary, stale-while-revalidate, or surrogate-key purge mechanics (see `cdn-cache-control-headers`); NOT for Cloudflare-specific product configuration once Cloudflare is already chosen (see `cloudflare`); NOT for video-specific transcoding, adaptive bitrate ladders, or streaming-protocol packaging (see `managed-video-streaming-pipeline`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Building resilient distributed systems with circuit breakers, retries with full-jitter exponential backoff, retry budgets (per-request 3-attempt + per-client 10% ratio per Google SRE), deadline propagation, and the cascading-failure math (4 layers × 3 retries = 64x amplification). Grounded in Resilience4j, Microsoft Cloud Patterns, AWS Architecture Blog (Marc Brooker), and Google SRE Book. NOT for server-side rate limiting, bulkhead isolation, backpressure protocols, or database-specific retry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in cluttering -- the lesser-known fluency disorder characterized by rapid/irregular speech rate, excessive disfluencies, and frequent ADHD comorbidity. Covers differential diagnosis from stuttering, assessment protocols, therapy approaches (rate control, self-monitoring, pragmatic awareness), technology-assisted intervention, and AI tools for people who clutter. Activate on 'cluttering', 'rapid speech disorder', 'speech rate too fast', 'speech disfluency not stuttering', 'disorganized speech', 'ADHD speech problems', 'cluttering vs stuttering', 'speech intelligibility', 'mazed speech', 'telescoping words'. NOT for stuttering-only treatment (overlap is common but they are distinct), hearing disorders, or voice disorders (pitch, resonance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。