「codebase」の検索結果

You are a documentation architect that produces structured wiki catalogues and onboarding guides from codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initialize, update, and visualize codebase or personal knowledge wikis using LangChain OpenWiki. Enforces OKF v0.2, Grounded Claims, interactive visualizer graph, and MCP page-job lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a CONTEXT.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

interview the user to design an agentic control loop (sensor, controller, actuator under disturbances) tailored to their codebase, then build it as locally-runnable components plus a scheduled coding-agent workflow

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when global skill for BDB Synapse (3D Codebase Visualizer) integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

既存プロジェクトをサブエージェントで並列分析し、 精度の高い overview.md を生成する。init-spec の前処理として使う。 「既存プロジェクトを分析して」「コードベースを理解して設計書を作って」 「overview.mdを作って」などのリクエストで使用する。 ファイル数が200を超えるプロジェクトで特に有効。 200以下の場合は単一エージェントで全体を読む方が精度が高いため、 init-spec をそのまま実行することを提案する。

Use when reviewing a project's architecture for design pattern applicability -- either validating a design document before implementation, or analyzing an existing codebase for pattern improvement opportunities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Core Swift development workflows for Xcode and Swift tooling, including project setup, dependency management, concurrency guidance, language/runtime best practices, and troubleshooting build or package resolution issues. Use when working on Swift tasks across a codebase, especially package/tooling/runtime work and cross-cutting Swift conventions (mutation semantics, naming, enum/file rules, import hygiene), including in SwiftUI projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate high-converting App Store screenshots by analyzing your app's codebase, discovering core benefits, and creating ASO-optimized screenshot images using Nano Banana Pro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for readability, then simplify it to be easy to follow and understand. Use this skill when the user wants to simplify code, improve readability, clean up for handoff, make code skimmable, reduce complexity, refactor for clarity, strip boilerplate, prepare code for future maintainers, or make a codebase easier to pick up. Trigger liberally — any request touching readability, simplification, cleanup, or "make this easier to understand" should use this skill. Also trigger when the user says things like "review this", "clean this up", "tidy this", "make this simpler", "reduce complexity", "flatten this", "strip the noise", or "I want to understand this code quickly next time I open it".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Craft a single, high-quality GitHub issue from a developer's description of a bug, unexpected behavior, or desired enhancement. Walks through reproduction, codebase exploration, and structured drafting so the issue is actionable on arrival. Use when user wants to file an issue, report a bug, request a feature, or document a problem they've encountered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies a modern CSS reset covering box-sizing, margin removal, text rendering, media defaults, and root stacking context. Use when starting a new web project, creating a global stylesheet, or when the codebase lacks sensible CSS defaults.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates IEEE-format LaTeX technical reports from project requirements and codebase evidence, using academic prose, pseudocode-only explanations, BibTeX references, and IEEEtran formatting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a GLOSSARY.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: investigating a legacy, inherited, third-party-built, or otherwise newly-unfamiliar codebase before scoping a migration or major refactor. Formalizes a repeatable five-step investigation pass — entry-point census, business-rule classification, side-effect/idempotency cataloging, implicit-contract discovery, semantic-duplication detection — plus a canonical per-project Open Questions document. Requires checkable signals: ticket keywords or prior documentation gaps. Not a mandatory gate; reserved for entry-point-heavy work in code areas with no prior investigation record.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: investigating a legacy, inherited, third-party-built, or otherwise newly-unfamiliar codebase before scoping a migration or major refactor. Formalizes a repeatable five-step investigation pass — entry-point census, business-rule classification, side-effect/idempotency cataloging, implicit-contract discovery, semantic-duplication detection — plus a canonical per-project Open Questions document. Requires checkable signals: ticket keywords or prior documentation gaps. Not a mandatory gate;

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Records decisions and documentation. Use when making architectural decisions, changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: a general codebase assessment, pre-migration/pre-rewrite review, or explicit security-focused request needs a structured, repeatable security audit pass covering hardcoded secrets, injection-prone constructs, auth/debug backdoors, and insecure config defaults. Complements (does not replace) the built-in /security-review command. Not a mandatory gate on every ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously deep-scan entire codebase line-by-line, understand architecture and patterns, then systematically transform it to production-grade, corporate-level professional quality with optimizations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize Bazel builds for large-scale monorepos. Use when configuring Bazel, implementing remote execution, or optimizing build performance for enterprise codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation for an existing repository/codebase using a bottom-up analysis approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up automatic keepalive for Appwrite free-tier projects to prevent them from being paused after 7 days of inactivity. Use when working in a codebase that uses Appwrite, when the developer mentions Appwrite free tier, project pausing, or keeping an Appwrite project alive, or when you detect Appwrite configuration (node-appwrite dependency, APPWRITE_ env vars, Appwrite SDK imports).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask the local Claude CLI to review plans, diffs, full codebases, completed work, and exploit chains when the user explicitly wants a Claude second opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develops an implementation plan ready for wave-orchestration to execute. Takes the user's goal or rough plan as input, mines the codebase for facts, grills the user one question at a time for the decisions, drafts the planning/ artifacts (task DAG, wave table, worker prompt template, state file), then reviews its own plan on two axes before seeking approval. Use when the user wants to turn a feature idea, master plan, or backlog into a wave-orchestration execution plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。