「thinking」の検索結果

Test a half-formed idea in a questioning conversation, with different personas probing its weak points, until the user can act on it or drop it with confidence. Optionally writes a short brief for planning skills to build on. Use when the user says 'forge an idea', 'pressure-test this idea', 'stress-test my thinking', or 'harden this idea'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates scientific claims and evidence quality. Applies to experimental design validity, biases and confounders, statistical interpretation, evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), and teaching critical analysis. Supports evidence appraisal and identifying flaws; formal peer review writing belongs to peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures a multi-perspective council exercise for decisions, research trade-offs, and creative challenges. Simulates thinking archetypes, separates evidence from assumptions and values, and synthesizes a conditional recommendation. Use when the user requests a council, panel, devil's advocate analysis, "mind council", or deliberate comparison of perspectives on a difficult choice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the DHDNA framework as an exploratory rubric for reasoning and writing patterns in supplied text. Used for explicit requests for DHDNA, cognitive-style reflection, a thinking-pattern profile, or comparisons of textual reasoning. Scores describe evidence in the sample, not validated psychological traits or personal identity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

女娲造人：输入人名/主题/甚至只是模糊需求，自动深度调研→思维框架提炼→生成可运行的人物Skill。 两种入口：(1)明确人名→直接蒸馏 (2)模糊需求→诊断推荐→再蒸馏。 触发词：「造skill」「蒸馏XX」「女娲」「造人」「XX的思维方式」「做个XX视角」「更新XX的skill」。 模糊需求也触发：「我想提升决策质量」「有没有一种思维方式能帮我...」「我需要一个思维顾问」。 English triggers: "distill [person]", "nuwa", "create a [person] perspective skill", "how does [person] think", "I need a thinking advisor".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mobile-first design thinking and decision-making for iOS and Android apps. Touch interaction, performance patterns, platform conventions. Teaches principles, not fixed values. Use when building React Native, Flutter, or native mobile apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master guide for using Claude Code effectively. Includes configuration templates, prompting strategies "Thinking" keywords, debugging techniques, and best practices for interacting with the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opt-in ambient signal capture. After explicit enablement, applies on substantive inbound messages to detect original thinking and entity mentions. Use an authorized sub-agent where supported; otherwise detect inline. Aim to never block the main response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brainstorm product ideas, explore problem spaces, and challenge assumptions as a thinking partner. Use when exploring a new opportunity, generating solutions to a product problem, stress-testing an idea, or when a PM needs to think out loud with a sharp sparring partner before converging on a direction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Headcount planning, org design, and team structure optimization. Trigger with "org planning", "headcount plan", "team structure", "reorg", "who should we hire next", or when the user is thinking about team size, reporting structure, or organizational design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial thinking partner for founders and executives. Stress-tests plans, prepares for brutal board meetings, dissects decisions with no good options, and forces honest post-mortems. Use when you need someone to find the holes before the board does, make a decision you've been avoiding, or understand what actually went wrong.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify risky assumptions for a feature idea in an existing product across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility. Uses multi-perspective devil's advocate thinking. Use when stress-testing a feature idea, doing risk assessment, or preparing for assumption mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANUAL TRIGGER ONLY: invoke only when user types /office-hours. YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to "brainstorm this", "I have an idea", "help me think through this", "office hours", or "is this worth building". Proactively suggest when the user describes a new product idea or is exploring whether something is worth building — before any code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Physics-based reasoning framework (Musk methodology) that deconstructs a problem to irreducible fundamental truths, classifies every element as hard constraint, soft constraint, or assumption, then reconstructs the optimal solution from fundamentals alone. USE WHEN first principles, fundamental truths, challenge assumptions, real constraint, rebuild from scratch, start over, physics first, question everything, reasoning by analogy. NOT FOR structural feedback loops (use SystemsThinking).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured incident investigation using Five Whys, Fishbone, blameless Postmortem, Fault Tree, Kepner-Tregoe, and FMEA — traces failures to systemic root causes rather than blaming humans. USE WHEN root cause, RCA, 5 whys, fishbone, postmortem, incident analysis, fault tree, why does this keep failing, blameless, recurring bug. NOT FOR systemic loops (use SystemsThinking).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Divergent ideation and corpus expansion via Verbalized Sampling plus extended thinking — single-shot generates several internally diverse candidates and surfaces the strongest, or expands a seed corpus into a diverse dataset for evals and test sets. USE WHEN be creative, brainstorm, divergent ideas, creative solutions, maximum creativity, tree of thoughts, radically different, name this, creative angle, expand this corpus, synthetic data, generate diverse examples, create test set. NOT FOR multi-cycle evolutionary ideation with Lamarckian meta-learning (use Ideate).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides researchers through structured ideation frameworks to discover high-impact research directions. Use when exploring new problem spaces, pivoting between projects, or seeking novel angles on existing work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户需要做方向性判断、评估「该往哪走/这事靠谱吗」、或想提升决策能力时调用。 核心理念: 判断力(知道行为长期后果)比努力重要; 清晰思考=从基础学科重建推理; 收集心智模型(复利/委托代理/可证伪性/基础数学)。 不适用于: 需要立即执行的具体任务步骤。 Triggers: 判断力/方向/第一性原理/心智模型/思维模型/判断靠不靠谱/judgment/mental model/first principles

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude and horizon thinking. Use when diagnosing scope, time-horizon, or leadership-level gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opinionated Rails conventions: rich models, concerns, CRUD-everything, state-as-records, minimal dependencies, Minitest with fixtures. Load this skill BEFORE any code-level thinking, not only before editing a file. It is required the moment a task touches Rails code in ANY way: designing or even just discussing a data model, schema, migration, entity, association, field, validation, class, or method name; writing, planning, reviewing, analyzing, testing, debugging, or refactoring; or proposing any model, table, column, route, or code snippet inline in chat. If you are about to name a model or sketch a column you are already in scope, even in an exploratory back-and-forth where no file is written yet. Do not let a "we're just discussing" framing defer it. Do NOT use for non-Rails backends, NestJS, or general architecture (use nestjs-modular-monolith or coding-guidelines).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draws original design and coding scenes as hand-authored SVG cards (480x360) in a two-colour brush-marker style. Identifying traits: thick wobbly black marker lines with blobby ends, built as filled ribbons; one second ink, mint green, in flat blocks that slip 2-10 px off the line like a misregistered print; solid black hair, trousers and shoes with mint highlight dashes; and a crinkly squiggle camo on cream areas, all on warm cream paper. Characters are chunky, with profile heads, big noses, dot eyes, big hands and feet. It covers people coding, thinking, carrying and resting with laptops, mugs, chairs and rubber ducks. Use when someone asks for brush, marker, felt-tip, two-colour, duotone, riso-print, zine, mint-and-black or doodle illustrations, or for empty states, onboarding, 404 pages, blog headers, feature spots or marketing cards with a bold hand-made look.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break through stagnation with lateral thinking personas — single or multi-persona debate

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。