「conform」の検索結果

Audit an existing mathematical, logical, algorithmic, or technical proof from its stated conclusion backward as a bounded AND/OR graph of exact obligations. Use to reconstruct conclusion dependencies, determine whether a proof-supplied route establishes the conclusion, or expose hidden assumptions, unmet side conditions, cycles, overly strong steps, or silent route switches. For a source-mapped Lamport rendering use convert-lamport, and for forward hierarchy, construct, and scope conformance use forward-lamport before this skill. This does not decide full theorem-level entailment by searching for a different proof; do not turn the audit into a linear reversed proof, exhaustive proof search, or replacement proof.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

火山引擎合规最佳实践助手：一是根据用户诉求（要满足的合规标准、关键词、关注的风险等级）， 从火山引擎官方内置的合规包模板里推荐该开启哪些、并标出哪些已开启；二是汇总账号当前的合规 态势，把已生效规则/合规包（官方内置 + 用户自定义）的评估结果按类别（法规 / 最佳实践 / 自定义）与严重度聚合成一份合规总览报告；三是当官方基线没覆盖时，指导用户写一条 Rego 策略 作为自定义合规规则并注册评估。可在用户确认后把推荐的模板部署为合规包。Use when 用户想做「合规检查 / 合规巡检 / 安全合规 / 合规最佳实践 / 该开哪些合规规则 / 等保合规 / 我火山账号合规吗 / 有哪些不合规 / 帮我写条自定义合规规则」，或提到火山引擎「配置审计 / Config / 合规包 / conformance pack / Rego 策略」。Trigger on 火山 / 火山引擎 / volcengine 关键词叠加合规场景。部署合规包 / 注册自定义规则属写操作，需用户确认；合规报告 与资源修复严格分离。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Data Warehousing Specialist — defining the grain of a fact table before modeling it, choosing a slowly changing dimension (SCD) type for a dimension attribute, designing an incremental ETL/ELT load strategy against a full-refresh alternative, resolving a conformed-dimension conflict across source systems, or diagnosing why a BI report's numbers don't reconcile to the source system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aircraft Structure, Surfaces, Rigging, and Systems Assembler — deciding whether an out-of-tolerance hole or fastener needs a nonconformance report versus a field fix, verifying torque and calibration status before a fastener installation, diagnosing a FOD (foreign object debris) risk before closing a structure, or reading a drawing callout against a conflicting work instruction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in complex functions, contour integration, residue theory, and conformal mappings

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Accessibility audit. Dispatches an accessibility auditor to identify WCAG conformance gaps, prioritize by user impact, and recommend fixes. Advisory only — no changes made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages the Morphir knowledge base under kb/ — OKF bundles and concept documents. Use when adding content to a bundle, creating a new bundle, checking the knowledge base for conformance or provenance drift, building or querying its SQLite index, managing intent through its lifecycle, recording or reading architectural decisions as Decision Records, or navigating, searching and listing its bundles, concepts and links.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when forensically auditing a Claude Code skill/agent/command/workflow library against RULESET.md by a fixed mechanical protocol — probing every file against the mechanically-checkable rules and reporting CONFORMS / VIOLATES / UNVERIFIABLE / N-A counts with quoted evidence. It casts NO judgment and emits NO pass/fail verdict; counts are the headline. Triggers on "investigate the library", "audit against RULESET", "find every violation", "forensic library audit", "evidence-only check". Not for routing/quality/single-responsibility judgment — use skill-library-review. Not the full sharded sweep — use the audit-library command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

依据 RGPD 第 28 条、EDPB 07/2020 和 02/2024 号指南、2021 年标准合同条款（CCT）（执行决定 2021/914）、EDPB 01/2020 号建议（Schrems II 之后的补充措施）以及《欧盟条例 (UE) 2024/1689》（《人工智能条例》），对数据处理协议（DPA）进行系统性分析。生成逐条款的 结构化报告（18 个条款：13 项强制 + 5 项补充），附 🟢/🟡/🔴 诊断、可直接插入的 救济条款、国际传输的详细分析、《人工智能条例》核验以及应向供应商提出的问题。 触发词："analyse de DPA"、"audit DPA"、"vérifier un DPA"、"DPA fournisseur"、 "data processing agreement"、"art. 28 RGPD"、"sous-traitant RGPD"、"négociation DPA"、 "review DPA"、"conformité contrat sous-traitance"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check a prototype against its original design direction and requirements before shipping. Compares implementation to the mockup/spec/context, flags drift in layout, spacing, type, color, states, and behavior, and reports a pass/fix list. Use when the user says "design QA", "does it match the design", "check against the spec", "conformance check", or before sharing/handing off a prototype. Part of the Product Design set. Uses a browser tool for visual comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take a chosen visual to finished, production-ready state. Runs cleanup + refinement passes (fix artifacts, balance composition, color-grade, sharpen text, conform to spec/aspect) using image edit/regenerate. Use when the user says "polish this", "finalize", "clean up the image", "production-ready", "fix the artifacts", or has a selected visual that needs finishing. Final stage of the Creative Production set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auditar e melhorar a acessibilidade web seguindo as diretrizes WCAG 2.1. Use quando solicitado para "melhorar acessibilidade", "auditoria a11y", "conformidade WCAG", "suporte a leitor de tela", "navegação por teclado" ou "tornar acessível".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analise código da interface para conformidade com as Diretrizes de Interface Web. Use quando solicitado para "revisar minha UI", "verificar acessibilidade", "auditar design", "revisar UX" ou "verificar meu site em relação às melhores práticas".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load this skill when writing, reviewing, or interpreting behavioral accessibility automation — tests that manipulate a rendered page (resizing the viewport, pressing real keys, capturing and comparing screenshots) rather than only inspecting static markup or a single computed accessibility tree. Covers Reflow risk (SC 1.4.10) and Focus Visible risk (SC 2.4.7) checks. Absolutely always report indicator results separately from confirmed failures. Under no circumstances treat a clean behavioral scan as WCAG conformance, or collapse `cantTell`/test-error/indicator outcomes into a single pass/fail signal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load this skill whenever you are filing, reviewing, or generating accessibility bug reports — whether from automated tool output, manual testing, user reports, or testing with disabled people. The purpose of this skill is to make accessibility findings easier to report accurately, connect them to real people and tasks, and let developers reproduce, understand, and fix them without unnecessary back-and-forth. Absolutely always describe the barrier and its task impact before citing a WCAG criterion. Under no circumstances guess a disability diagnosis, treat automated tool output as a conformance conclusion, or expose secrets/personal data in a report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement unit, conformance, integration, timing, boot, trace, video, audio, and regression tests for EMULATORS processors, chips, peripherals, and complete machines. Use when creating a verification strategy for a new emulator, converting hardware documentation into tests, adding diagnostic programs or golden artifacts, measuring behavioral coverage, or proving that components interact correctly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a proven POC into a real, crouton-native, documented package(s) + a consuming app — the deliberate "step back and rebuild" checkpoint. SPEC-DRIVEN — the POC discovers a behaviour spec (captured at each sign-off), graduation freezes it as authoritative, the app is rebuilt the crouton way to satisfy it, and nothing is done until it's checked + signed off against two gates (experience + crouton-conformance). Use when a `pocs/*` app is proven and "done", or asked to "graduate this poc", "make it a real app", "extract the package".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, reviewing, modifying, migrating, optimizing, securing, operating, troubleshooting, or decommissioning data architectures across data model exploration, SQL, ISO SQL conformance, NoSQL, vector, graph, document, time-series, NewSQL, search, in-memory, SQLite, CDC/Debezium, DBMS storage/query/recovery internals, database incident prevention, hardware acceleration, cache, big-data, lakehouse, and warehouse systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Use for AI system classification (high-risk vs prohibited vs general), conformity assessment procedures, GPAI model obligations, transparency and disclosure requirements, governance structure (AI Office / AI Board), penalty tiers, value-chain operator obligations, post-market monitoring, and Annex III use-case analysis. Does not cover EU liability rules for AI (separate proposed directive) or implementation guidance documents issued after July 2024.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7150.2D — NASA Software Engineering Requirements. Use for NASA's Agency-wide software-engineering requirements: the software classification scheme (Classes A–F), the Requirements Mapping Matrix and class-driven applicability, tailoring and Technical Authority governance, the SWE-### 'shall' requirements across software management (Ch 3) and the engineering life cycle (Ch 4), the supporting disciplines (configuration management, risk, peer reviews/inspections, measurement, non-conformance — Ch 5), safety-critical and cybersecurity requirements, IV&V applicability, traceability, and the Appendix A definitions. Does not cover detailed software-assurance/safety procedures (see NASA-STD-8739.8), implementation how-to and document content (see NASA-HDBK-2203), the systems-engineering process framework (see NPR 7123.1), or program/project management (see NPR 7120.5).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a DRAFT internal audit pack from the audit plan: scope as stated, criteria with clauses quoted from the documents provided, document requests per auditee with due dates, open interview questions per process and role, previous findings to follow up and a readiness checklist. Never pre-judges conformity, writes findings or selects the sample; the lead auditor decides. Use when the user asks to "prepare the internal audit", "build the audit pack from this plan", "draft the document requests and interview questions" or "get us ready for the supplier audit". Do not use for evidence requests built from a control list, use control-evidence-request-pack instead; to chase actions from earlier audits, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns sustainability or ESG reports the user provides into a DRAFT question pack for reviewers: every quantitative disclosure as stated with unit, period, boundary and page, year-over-year changes computed only from the stated figures with the arithmetic shown, targets with stated and computed progress, restatements and inconsistencies, gaps and specific questions to the report owner. No assurance, accuracy or conformance verdict. Use when the user asks to "prepare review questions on our sustainability report", "what changed year on year in this ESG report", "check the figures in this report before it goes to the board", "find the gaps in this ESG disclosure" or "build a question pack for the report owner". Do not use for reviewing marketing text against environmental-claim rules, use green-claims-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run ADR conformance checks, explain failures, and identify required ADR/doc updates for the current change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Aws Config — aWS Config compliance dashboard, rule evaluation status, conformance pack management, and resource timeline analysis. Covers configuration recorder status, compliance summary, non-compliant resource investigation, remediation tracking, and aggregator management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。