「comparison」の検索結果

Designing side-by-side comparison tools (plan-compare, product-compare, alternative-compare) that help users decide rather than just listing features. Axis selection, default-comparison logic, recommendation discipline. Honest about feature-list-dump (every feature in a row, no decision support), hidden-recommendation (biased comparison pretending to be neutral), and honest-comparison-with-guidance (genuine comparison plus opinionated recommendation) patterns. Triggers on comparison tool, plan compare, product compare, alternative compare, vs page, decision support tool. Also triggers when conversion through comparison stages is poor, when users are abandoning at the comparison step, or when a comparison tool is being scoped for the first time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write "X vs Y" comparison blog posts that help readers choose between two competing products. Triggers on: "write a comparison post", "X vs Y blog post", "compare [product A] and [product B]", "which is better [A] or [B]", "head to head comparison", "[product] vs [product] article", "comparison review", "write a versus article", "side by side comparison blog", "which should I choose [A] or [B]", "compare these two products for my blog".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive competitor analysis, competitive intelligence, and comparison page creation. Use when analyzing competitive landscape, creating competitor comparison pages (alternative pages, vs pages, competitor A vs B pages), performing market research, building SWOT analysis, creating feature matrices, pricing comparisons, competitor teardowns, battle cards, or positioning maps. Covers research workflows, SEO-optimized comparison content, data-grounded reports with citations, 7-layer analysis framework, review mining, and sales enablement. Triggers include competitor analysis, competitive analysis, competitor teardown, vs page, alternative page, competitor comparison, market research, competitive intelligence, SWOT analysis, battle card, competitor pricing, market landscape, feature comparison, positioning map.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized skill for handling complex object comparison and deep validation. Use when you need to compare deep objects, exclude specific properties, handle circular references, or validate DTOs/Entities. Covers BeEquivalentTo, Excluding, Including, custom comparison rules, etc. Keywords: object comparison, deep comparison, BeEquivalentTo, DTO comparison, Entity validation, excluding properties, circular reference, Excluding, Including, ExcludingNestedObjects, RespectingRuntimeTypes, WithStrictOrdering, ignore timestamp, exclude timestamp

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Competitor research and intelligence skill. Takes a user's company (with optional seed competitor URLs), auto-discovers additional competitors via Browserbase Search API, deeply researches each using a 4-lane pattern (marketing surface, external signal, public benchmarks, strategic diff vs the user's company), and compiles the results into an HTML report with four views: overview, per-competitor deep dive, side-by-side feature/pricing matrix, and a chronological mentions feed (news, reviews, social, comparison pages, and public benchmarks). Use when the user wants to: (1) analyze competitors, (2) build a competitive matrix, (3) extract competitor pricing / features, (4) find comparison pages and online mentions of competitors, (5) surface public benchmarks. Triggers: "competitor analysis", "analyze competitors", "competitive intel", "competitor research", "competitor pricing", "feature comparison", "price comparison", "find comparisons", "who's comparing us", "competitor mentions", "competitor benchmarks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, researches and writes comparison pages: "[rival] alternatives", "[product] vs [rival]", "[rival A] vs [rival B]" and switching guides. Builds each page from a ledger of sourced, dated facts and ends with an honest verdict on who should choose which product. Use when someone asks for an "alternative page", a "vs page", a "competitor comparison", "comparison landing pages", "why us instead of them", or wants existing comparison pages checked for outdated prices and claims that cannot be backed up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Nexscope (Search Intelligence Framework) data to analyze ASIN traffic source composition and exposure distribution, covering current period/previous period/newly entered/exited period comparisons. Trigger when the user mentions ASIN traffic sources, traffic structure analysis, organic traffic vs paid traffic share, exposure score breakdown, period comparison, new/exited traffic keywords, competitor traffic analysis, SP ad keyword count, brand ad exposure, Amazon's Choice exposure, editorial recommendation exposure, Top Rated exposure, video ad exposure, organic search exposure ratio, PPC traffic sources, promotional deal traffic sources, recommendation slot structure breakdown, ASIN traffic analysis, traffic sources, organic traffic share, ad traffic share, exposure analysis, traffic structure, period-over-period comparison, keyword churn, Nexscope. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "Nexscope", if their need involves analyzing an ASIN's traffic sources, exposure channel distribution, cross-period comparison, or competitor traffic structure comparison, this skill should also be triggered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates high-converting 'X vs Y' and 'X alternatives' SEO pages that capture comparison search traffic. Researches competitors, writes honest comparison content, and adds schema markup (FAQPage, ItemList). Use when someone needs alternatives pages, comparison content, or says 'alternatives page', 'vs page', 'comparison', 'competitor alternatives', 'X vs Y page', or wants to capture competitor brand search traffic with SEO content. Also trigger when someone wants to rank for competitor brand names, capture competitor search traffic, create a compare page, or build a competitive content hub. Even if they just say 'how do we compete with X' or 'we need to show up when people search for [competitor]', this skill applies. Owns the individual alternatives / vs / comparison page. For a batch roadmap of many pages with a phase tracker, see /seo-machine. For programmatic SEO and templated content at scale, see /seo-content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages. Covers "X vs Y" layouts, "alternatives to X" pages, feature matrices, schema markup, and conversion optimization. Use when user says "comparison page", "vs page", "alternatives page", "competitor comparison", "X vs Y", "alternatives page", "versus page", "comparison matrix", or "feature comparison".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and buyer-facing use. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'competitor teardown,' 'audit our competitor pages,' 'are our comparison pages out of date,' or 'competitive asset audit.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For auditing existing claims (not researching competitors from scratch, which is competitor-profiling; not technical SEO on these pages, which is seo-audit), use the asset audit here. For internal battle cards and sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'switch from competitor,' or 'comparison content.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a 'model comparison grid' video from a config — a fal-style "same prompt, N contenders" showcase — a dark real-DOM stage where per beat a monospace prompt fades in centered, docks to a small top strip, then a labeled 2-4 panel grid (static images OR muted video clips, mixable per cell) staggers in and holds for comparison, plus a minimal end card — frame-stepped via Playwright (video cells are frame-seeked deterministically) and encoded with FFmpeg. Deterministic assembly, FREE (cell media comes from create-image-fal / create-video-fal, music from create-music-elevenlabs), text stays pixel-crisp. Use for the model-comparison-grid format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare several Japanese NLP libraries, models, or datasets for a keyword (a specific tool name, or a function/task like '形態素解析') across a handful of criteria chosen for that comparison, rendered as a ○/△/✕ table. Use when the user wants a side-by-side comparison of multiple Japanese NLP tools/libraries/datasets, not just the single best one. Trigger phrases include 'X と Y と Z を比較して', '形態素解析ライブラリを比較', 'MeCab と Sudachi どっちがいい', 'どのツールを使うべき', 'compare japanese tokenizers', 'mecab vs sudachi vs janome', 'which embedding model should I use', '日本語NERライブラリの比較表', 'pros and cons of japanese OCR tools'. For a single ranked list use search; for alternatives to one specific tool (or contribution candidates) without a multi-axis table, use discover.

🇺🇸 SEO & GEO Dual-Engine Playbook 2026 — Rank on Google AND get cited by AI search (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini). Battle-tested from AFFiNE (60k GitHub stars in 24 months) and 150+ AI startup consultations. E-E-A-T writing voice system, keyword funnel strategy, JSON-LD schema templates, comparison page SOP, IndexNow setup, Generative Engine Optimization content patterns. **Optimized for dev tools / OSS / B2B SaaS. 2C products (education, apps, games): see 2c-adaptation guide in references/.** 🇨🇳 SEO & GEO 双引擎增长手册 —— 同时拿下 Google 排名和 AI 搜索引用（ChatGPT、Perplexity、Claude、文心一言）的完整方法论。AFFiNE 60k stars 与 150+ AI 创业公司咨询实战验证。E-E-A-T 写作声音系统、关键词漏斗、JSON-LD 结构化数据、竞品对比页 SOP、IndexNow 推送、生成式引擎优化内容模式。**默认适用于开发者工具 / 开源项目 / B2B SaaS，2C 产品（教育/应用/游戏）请参考 references/2c-adaptation.md。** 🇯🇵 SEO & GEO デュアルエンジングロースプレイブック — Google検索とAI検索（ChatGPT、Perplexity、Claude）の両方で評価される手法。AFFiNE 60k starsと150社以上のAIスタートアップコンサルティングで検証。E-E-A-Tライティング、キーワードファネル、Schema.org構造化データ、比較ページSOP。**デフォルトは開発者ツール／OSS／B2B SaaS向け。2C製品（教育・アプリ・ゲーム）はreferences/2c-adaptation.mdを参照。** 🇰🇷 SEO & GEO 듀얼 엔진 성장 플레이북 — 구글 검색과 AI 검색(ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude) 양쪽 모두에서 인용되는 방법론. AFFiNE 60k 스타와 150+ AI 스타트업 컨설팅으로 검증. E-E-A-T 글쓰기, 키워드 퍼널, Schema.org 구조화 데이터, 비교 페이지 SOP. **기본값은 개발자 도구/OSS/B2B SaaS용. 2C 제품(교육·앱·게임)은 references/2c-adaptation.md 참조.** Triggers: "SEO" | "GEO" | "Generative Engine Optimization" | "AI search optimization" | "ChatGPT SEO" | "Perplexity SEO" | "Claude SEO" | "search optimization" | "content SEO" | "technical SEO" | "schema markup" | "JSON-LD" | "structured data" | "IndexNow" | "E-E-A-T" | "keyword strategy" | "keyword funnel" | "comparison page" | "programmatic SEO" | "SaaS SEO" | "搜索优化" | "AI 搜索" | "内容 SEO" | "GEO 优化" | "生成式引擎优化"

Create and manage topic-specific project workspaces for validation, investigation, PoC, comparison, or workstreams, including meeting notes in an existing project. Use for a project workspace, cost comparison workspace, or project meeting notes. Triggers on プロジェクトワークスペース, 検証フォルダ, PoC ワークスペース, トピック別作業フォルダ, プロジェクトの議事メモ. Not for ongoing customer account operations or book manuscripts.

Compare ENCODE experiments across different biosamples, tissues, or cell lines to identify tissue-specific regulatory patterns. Use when the user wants cross-tissue comparison, cell-type comparison, tissue-specific elements, differential chromatin, biosample matching, disease vs normal comparison, developmental time course, constitutive vs variable regulation, or multi-tissue data availability mapping. Handles batch effect detection, biosample hierarchy, and comparison design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Affiliate and sponsored content generator — create natural product review, comparison, and recommendation articles that comply with ステマ規制. Integrates compliance-checker for automatic legal safety. Supports review, comparison, and experience-based formats.

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages. Covers "X vs Y" layouts, "alternatives to X" pages, feature matrices, schema markup, and conversion optimization. Use when user says "comparison page", "vs page", "alternatives page", "competitor comparison", "X vs Y", "versus", "compare competitors", or "alternative to".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manual for the marginaleffects R and Python package, and guide to the book "Model to Meaning". Use when users ask about predictions, comparisons, slopes, marginal effects, average treatment effects (ATE/ATT/CATE), hypothesis testing, contrasts, counterfactuals, risk ratios, odds ratios, causal inference with G-computation, or need help with marginaleffects functions like predictions(), comparisons(), slopes(), hypotheses(), datagrid(), avg_predictions(), avg_comparisons(), avg_slopes(), or plot functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

对比图/一图流：生成 A vs B 参数对比图、优劣势对比表、产品参数一图流。 用 HTML+CSS 渲染成可截图的视觉卡片，适合小红书/微博等平台分享。 使用时机：用户说"做个对比图"、"A vs B"、"参数对比"、"优劣对比"、 "一图流"、"对比表"、"哪个好"、"对比一下"。 和 chart-visualization 的区别：chart 做数据图表（柱状图/折线图），comparison-card 做对比表/一图流。 和 infographic 的区别：infographic 做多维信息图，comparison-card 专注 A vs B 对比。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages. Covers "X vs Y" layouts, "alternatives to X" pages, feature matrices, schema markup, and conversion optimization. Use when user says "comparison page", "vs page", "alternatives page", "competitor comparison", "X vs Y", "versus", "compare competitors", or "alternative to".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare UX patterns across multiple reference apps using pattern libraries produced by ux-extract. Reads 2+ pattern-library.md files, walks them category by category, identifies where apps converge (strong signal), where they diverge (genuine design choice), what's unique to one app, and what's absent across the set. Produces an opinionated comparison document with recommendations for a new build. No browser needed — pure markdown analysis. Trigger with 'compare UX patterns', 'how do top apps handle X', 'ux comparison', 'pattern comparison across reference apps'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。