455 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Capture confidence ratings before and after a learning attempt to identify overconfidence and underconfidence patterns. Use when a student wants to understand how well they actually know something versus how well they think they know it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture confidence ratings before and after a learning attempt to identify overconfidence and underconfidence patterns. Use when a student wants to understand how well they actually know something versus how well they think they know it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assigns confidence scores to agent outputs based on multiple factors including source quality, consistency, and reasoning depth. Produces calibrated confidence estimates. Activate on 'confidence score', 'how confident', 'certainty level', 'output confidence', 'reliability score'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when assigning a confidence level to an analytical judgment, the user asks "how confident are we?" / "what is the confidence on X?", or the orchestrator's tradecraft pipeline calls for a confidence level before publishing. Provides three named levels (High, Moderate, Low) with 0-100 score ranges aligned to STIX, and the rule that confidence cannot exceed what the weakest load-bearing claim supports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads model uncertainty from token log-probabilities. Covers collecting logprobs and aggregating multi-token labels, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration assessment with ECE, Brier scores, and reliability diagrams against human labels, responsible downstream use of confidence, and reproducibility archives. Use when the user asks about classifier confidence by item, logprobs, top-k tokens, calibration, ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams, or routing low-confidence cases to human review. Codebook and validation design go to text-classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VRChat エコシステムツール（ModularAvatar / liltoon / VRCFury / AvatarOptimizer 等）の ナレッジを 4 フェーズで段階的に調査・検証し `knowledge/*.md` に再現可能な形で蓄積する。 ソースコード読解 → inspect 実測まで進めると confidence を `high` に昇格できる。 トリガー: 新しい VRChat コミュニティツールに初めて遭遇した、 既存ナレッジの confidence が low で作業に支障がある、 ユーザーから「このツールについて調べて」と依頼された場合。
請求書やフォームなどの規則的なテキストから情報を取り出す処理を、正規表現とLLMで設計し、抽出結果の信頼度が低い項目だけを確認・修正する流れを示します。
Opt-in evidence-first causal diagnosis for bugs, browser or app/device failures, flaky behavior, and performance regressions. Activate only when the user explicitly invokes `$diagnose` or explicitly asks to use the named diagnose skill. Do not activate merely because the user mentions a bug, asks why something failed, requests debugging or a fix, or describes unexpected behavior. Once explicitly invoked, locate likely causes, instrument relevant boundaries with extensive structured logging, reproduce the issue, analyze the collected logs, rank causes with confidence scores, and pursue 100% operational confidence while probes can increase confidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes, triages, flags and rates a piece of text with a probability for every option: which department or queue a ticket goes to, which intent a message expresses, whether a yes/no condition holds (is this tool call grounded, should the agent ask first, is the customer angry), and how severe or urgent it is on a rubric, each with a calibrated confidence. Runs Claude Haiku in the request and response shapes of OpenAI's Decisions API, for when no purpose-built decision model is at hand. Use for "route this ticket", "triage these", "classify with a confidence", "give me a probability that", "rate the severity", "score against this rubric", guardrail checks before a tool call, or "a Decisions API without OpenAI".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads a model's own uncertainty from token log-probabilities: collecting and aggregating label logprobs, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration against human labels (ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams), downstream use, and reproducibility. Use for per-item classifier confidence or routing low-confidence cases to human review; codebook and validation design go to text-classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Records atomic learned behaviors with confidence scores. Project-scoped instincts are isolated per project and auto-promote to global scope at confidence threshold 0.8. Stores instincts in .claude/context/memory/instincts.jsonl
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Epistemic transparency — acknowledging uncertainty, flagging limitations, avoiding overconfidence, and communicating what is known, unknown, and uncertain with proportional confidence. Maps the HEXACO personality dimension to AI reasoning: truthful calibration of confidence, proactive disclosure of gaps, and resistance to the temptation to appear more certain than warranted. Use before presenting a conclusion, when answering questions where knowledge is partial or inferred, after noticing a temptation to state uncertain information as certain, or when a user is making decisions based on provided information.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify insects using body plan analysis, dichotomous keys to order, wing venation, mouthpart type, antennae form, leg and tarsal structure, and confidence levels. Covers the fundamental hexapod body plan verification, a simplified dichotomous key to major orders, wing venation and type analysis, mouthpart classification, antennae morphology, leg specialization and tarsal formula, and a structured confidence assessment framework. Use when you need to identify an unknown insect beyond preliminary order placement, are working through a specimen for taxonomic study, want to distinguish between similar orders or families, or need to assign a confidence level to a field identification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add an external probabilistic classifier to a decision path without letting it take the path over. Covers finding the externally-graded rows you are already logging, measuring the confidence separation between the overrides it got right and the ones it got wrong, choosing an operating point your data licenses, failing open at the call site, and proving the whole arrangement offline with no API key. Applies to any service returning a score you can order — TypeSafe AI's System One models (Jev) are the worked example. Most of the method transfers to a local model or a second heuristic, with the parts that do not called out where they arise. Use when a rule-based path is wrong often enough to hurt, when someone proposes replacing a heuristic with a model, when a confidence threshold needs a defensible value, or when an oracle already in production has never been graded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DiffDock and DiffDock-L diffusion-based molecular docking. Use for blind protein-small-molecule pose prediction from a PDB file or sequence plus SMILES/SDF/MOL2, batch docking over a CSV of complexes, virtual screening triage, sampling multiple poses per complex, and reading the confidence score correctly. Also trigger on DiffDock, DiffDock-L, inference.py, confidence_model, samples_per_complex, ESM embedding preparation for docking, or blind docking without a defined box. Not for binding affinity prediction — the confidence score ranks pose plausibility, not potency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns untargeted LC-MS/MS features (m/z, RT, MS/MS) into confidence-stratified metabolite annotations using spectral-library matching (matchms), in-silico tools (SIRIUS/CSI:FingerID, MetFrag) and molecular networking, and assigns a defensible MSI/Schymanski confidence level to each. Use when naming detected features, scoring MS/MS against a reference library, running SIRIUS, or deciding what confidence level an evidence set actually supports. For upstream feature extraction see metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing and metabolomics/msdial-preprocessing; for downstream enrichment that must respect these levels see metabolomics/pathway-mapping; for lipid-specific structural annotation see metabolomics/lipidomics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[32] ANALYZE. Ensure every critical claim has verifiable evidence with confidence levels. Each fact must have source + confidence percentage. If confidence <85%, enter Loop150 to find more sources. Use for critical decisions, factual claims, legal/compliance work, or any situation where unverified claims are dangerous.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[32] ANALYZE. Ensure every critical claim has verifiable evidence with confidence levels. Each fact must have source + confidence percentage. If confidence <85%, enter Loop150 to find more sources. Use for critical decisions, factual claims, legal/compliance work, or any situation where unverified claims are dangerous.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
調査テーマを複数の問いに分け、ウェブ情報の検索と本文の読み込みを通じて、出典・確信度・情報不足を明記したレポートにまとめるスキル。