「conformance」の検索結果

The crouton-conformance gate — the SECOND acceptance axis of graduation (the first is the experience side-by-side, /graduate stage C1). Checks a graduated app is a REAL crouton app — CLI-scaffolded, real collections, consumes the correct packages without reinventing them — by composing the existing probes (frontend-review, a11y, e2e-smoke, typecheck) plus crouton-structural checks, then renders a required, signed-off checklist on the graduation PR. Use at /graduate stage C2, or when asked "is this app crouton-native", "run the conformance gate", "check graduation conformance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control and non-conformance management for regulated manufacturing (FDA 21 CFR 820, IATF 16949, AS9100): NCR lifecycle and disposition, 5-Why/Ishikawa/fault-tree/8D root cause analysis, CAPA systems, SPC interpretation, AQL sampling, and supplier quality audits. Use when investigating non-conformances, performing root cause analysis, managing CAPAs, interpreting SPC data, or handling supplier quality issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codified expertise for quality control, non-conformance investigation, root cause analysis, corrective action, and supplier quality management in regulated manufacturing. Informed by quality engineers with 15+ years experience across FDA, IATF 16949, and AS9100 environments. Includes NCR lifecycle management, CAPA systems, SPC interpretation, and audit methodology. Use when investigating non-conformances, performing root cause analysis, managing CAPAs, interpreting SPC data, or handling supplier quality issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a nonconformance report from inspection notes, test results and the governing specification or procedure: what was observed, where, the evidence with references, the requirement cited quoted verbatim with the departure from it, and containment proposals for the quality lead to decide. Never classifies severity, dispositions the item, names a root cause or closes the report. Use when the user asks to "write up this nonconformance", "draft an NCR from my inspection notes", "formalise this deviation" or "turn this snag into a defect report". Do not use for tracking the actions an NCR raises, use corrective-action-tracker instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The re-measure and standing report of the canonical data model's live DB conformance. Use when asked 'where are we at' on DB drift or conformance, to update the drift numbers, when a drift-audit brief is re-issued, or on /drift-audit. NOT the per-table fix recipe (use matrx-frontend's db-canonicalize-table).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codified expertise for quality control, non-conformance investigation, root cause analysis, corrective action, and supplier quality management in regulated manufacturing. Informed by quality engineers with 15+ years experience across FDA, IATF 16949, and AS9100 environments. Includes NCR lifecycle management, CAPA systems, SPC interpretation, and audit methodology. Use when investigating non-conformances, performing root cause analysis, managing CAPAs, interpreting SPC data, or handling supplier quality issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to run a four-panel adversarial advisory review on any pull request that touches the OpenAPM specification artifact (docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-*.md), its inline / sidecar JSON Schemas (docs/src/content/docs/specs/schemas/*.schema.json), or the conformance fixture seed (tests/fixtures/spec-conformance/**). The panel fans out to four spec-ecosystem reviewers (swagger-openapi-editor, oci-distribution-editor, pkgmgr-registry-contract-editor, w3c-tag-architect), each running in its own agent thread, and a spec-editor synthesizer that produces a fold-now / defer-v0.1.1 / defer-v0.2 / reject list plus a ship decision keyed off a 1..10 shocked_meter scale. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE consolidated comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes folds, and renders a ship recommendation that the maintainer weighs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review clinical data models and APIs for HL7 FHIR conformance, terminology standards, interoperability, and clinical workflow correctness. Triggers: 'check FHIR compliance', 'review clinical data model', 'audit HL7 conformance', 'validate medical terminology codes'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a phase-gated refactoring or redesign loop - session-blind workers map and trace the area, empirical probes precede the design, an approval gate guards implementation, and a conformance audit re-checks the branch after any design change. State persists in .episteme/DESIGN-<slug>.md. Requires the refactor agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: refactor loop, redesign, design gate, enumerate before design, conformance audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to verify a story or ticket implementation against its spec - per-AC verdicts, code reuse and design conformance, dead code, then adversarial maintainer verification. Requires the qa/review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: story QA, acceptance criteria, spec conformance, AC coverage, QA this branch, verify story.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying a story or ticket implementation against its spec and acceptance criteria - per-AC verdicts with file:line evidence and proving tests, code reuse and design conformance, dead code, stale docs, comment discipline. Finds the spec from an explicit path, the ticket key in the branch name, or plan files - and asks rather than guessing. For defect-hunting code review use dotnet-techne-code-review instead. Keywords: story QA, acceptance criteria, spec conformance, AC coverage, definition of done, dead code check, reuse check, comment check, verify story, QA this branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Aws Config Deep — aWS Config deep rule and compliance management. Covers Config rules, conformance packs, aggregators, advanced queries, remediation actions, configuration history, and multi-account compliance dashboards. Use when auditing AWS resource compliance, managing Config rules, reviewing conformance pack results, or querying resource configurations across accounts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codified expertise for quality control, non-conformance investigation, root cause analysis, corrective action, and supplier quality management in regulated manufacturing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement comprehensive API security testing using the 42Crunch platform to perform static audit and dynamic conformance scanning of OpenAPI specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

実装差分が plan / todo / test-cases アーティファクトの方針と一致しているかを検査し、逸脱・漏れ・意図外変更を検知する

リポジトリに DESIGN.md やデザイントークン定義が存在する場合に、新規 UI 実装の色・余白・フォントサイズ・角丸・シャドウがその定義済みスケールに準拠しているかを照合する。定義が無ければ実行しない

新実装が、同種の先行実装（同レイヤ・同責務・同概念）に在る防御 / バリデーション / エラー処理 / 規約 / 共通化ロジック / 概念定義を、欠落・重複・食い違いなく継承しているかを grep で先行特定して確認する

(core) route header and body-height conformance via PageHeader. Use when fixing a (core) page's header, title bar, breadcrumbs, sub-route nav, body height (h-page, calc(100dvh…)), mobile header, or buttons hidden behind the avatar, or on a header-conformance assignment. NOT for /administration/* routes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Swift 6.2 Approachable Concurrency — single-threaded by default, @concurrent for explicit background offloading, isolated conformances for main actor types. Use when adopting Swift 6.2 concurrency — offloading with @concurrent or resolving main-actor isolation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused interactive tutor for the Model Context Protocol (MCP) path in AI Engineering from Scratch. Start or resume this route when a learner wants to build, secure, debug, verify, or operate MCP clients, servers, transports, gateways, registries, or conformance gates. Teaches one lesson per invocation and records wire evidence in MCP-LEARNING.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill validation framework PLUS daily test-suite health and regression intelligence. Validates skill conformance (frontmatter, manifest coverage, resolver coverage). Runs the project test suite in tiered phases (unit / evals / integration / system health), classifies failures, and produces a regression-aware report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new skills following the GBrain conformance standard. Generates SKILL.md with frontmatter, Contract, Phases, Output Format, and Anti-Patterns. Checks MECE against existing skills. Updates manifest and resolver.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。