本文へ移動
cccskills

「red-teaming」の検索結果

51 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Wires Promptfoo and DeepTeam into CI/CD for automated, repeatable red-teaming of LLM apps against OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Agentic, and MITRE ATLAS presets, failing the build when jailbreak or injection vulnerabilities regress. Use for continuous adversarial testing in CI/CD, a merge-blocking security gate, or comparing model/prompt versions for compliance reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Wire Promptfoo and DeepTeam into CI/CD for automated regression red-teaming of LLM apps against OWASP LLM Top 10 and OWASP Agentic presets, failing the build when jailbreak or injection vulnerabilities regress.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills4.7万2026年10月12日 更新

Detect MITRE ATLAS AML.T0024 attacks (model stealing, inversion, membership inference) performed via inference-API abuse, by monitoring per-principal query volume/distribution, rate-limiting and perturbing outputs, and red-teaming your model's extractability. Use for a public or partner inference API needing cloning/inversion/membership-inference detection, or a pre-deployment red-team exercise to measure extraction risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

LLM application red-teaming — prompt injection (direct + indirect), jailbreak, system-prompt leak, data exfiltration, guardrail bypass, multi-turn crescendo, cross-lingual + cipher + invisible-unicode token smuggling, excessive agency / tool abuse, insecure output handling. Canonical OWASP LLM Top 10 + ASI01-ASI10 mapping. Use when a target exposes a chat/completions/assistant/copilot endpoint, an AI feature that consumes user text or documents, or any /v1/chat, /api/chat, /mcp surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

awarexone/Agentic-Bug-Hunter5,3252026年10月10日 更新

Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills1,1552026年5月22日 更新

LLM and AI application security testing — prompt injection, jailbreak resistance, OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025), RAG and agent/tool-use security, model supply chain, and AI red teaming for authorized assessments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill4712026年9月8日 更新

Use when red-teaming an agentic AI / LLM application — indirect & zero-click prompt injection, MCP tool poisoning, persistent memory poisoning, excessive-agency tool abuse, multi-turn jailbreaks, PyRIT/Garak/Promptfoo harnesses

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude3892026年9月28日 更新

Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lingxling/awesome-skills-cn3062026年10月7日 更新

Plan, execute, document, and retest authorized security assessments of AI agents and multi-agent workflows using safe adversarial cases, synthetic identities, canaries, and evidence-based findings. Use when defining red-team rules of engagement, assessing prompt injection or excessive agency, testing tool and identity boundaries, evaluating memory or cross-agent attacks, scoring a campaign, or verifying remediation in an approved environment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

seb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills2072026年8月10日 更新

Test application security against OWASP Top 10 (2025) with automated CI tooling: OWASP ZAP (DAST), dependency/supply-chain scanning (OSV-Scanner, SBOM, provenance), Semgrep SAST, auth/session tests (JWT, OAuth, RBAC), and XSS/CSRF/SQLi/SSRF Playwright patterns. Use when: "security test," "OWASP," "vulnerability," "ZAP," "XSS," "SSRF," "dependency scan," "auth testing," "OWASP LLM Top 10." Scope is automated scanning + negative-path security tests in CI, not manual penetration testing. Not for: mapping security controls to regulations (SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI, GDPR) — use compliance-testing; pipeline stage wiring and deploy gating mechanics — use ci-cd-integration; purely functional API auth/input tests with no attacker model — see api-testing; testing your product's own LLM features or defending the agent itself (prompt-injection detector, indirect injection, jailbreak red-teaming) — use ai-system-testing. Related: ci-cd-integration, compliance-testing, api-testing, shift-left-testing, ai-system-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

petrkindlmann/qa-skills1722026年6月11日 更新

Write, run, and analyze structured test suites for Agentforce agents — functional AND security. TRIGGER when: user writes or modifies test spec YAML (AiEvaluationDefinition); runs sf agent test create, run, run-eval, or results commands; asks about test coverage strategy, metric selection, or custom evaluations; interprets test results or diagnoses test failures; asks about batch testing, regression suites, or CI/CD test integration; requests security testing, OWASP LLM Top 10, red-teaming, penetration testing, prompt-injection tests, a security grade, or a vulnerability assessment of an agent. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user creates, modifies, previews, or debugs .agent files (use agentforce-generate); deploys or publishes agents; writes Agent Script code; uses sf agent preview for development iteration; analyzes production session traces (use agentforce-observe); performs a static safety review of .agent file content (use agentforce-generate Section 15).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SalesforceAIResearch/agentforce-adlc1142026年9月13日 更新

Skeptical analysis and critique of claims, plans, and code without taking anyone at face value. Use when the user says "don't trust me", wants adversarial review, red-teaming, assumption checking, or verification that generated or proposed code is actually correct. Triggers on skepticism, critique everything, verify claims, challenge assumptions, red team, devil's advocate, prove it, smell test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

StudyDrift/lextures622026年10月10日 更新

Execute commands and binaries on remote Windows systems utilizing PsExec and SMB/RPC mechanisms. This skill details the mechanics behind tools like Sysinternals PsExec, Impacket's psexec.py, and their role in lateral movement via hidden administrative shares.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Test Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for data poisoning, prompt injection via retrieved documents, and data exfiltration through manipulated context windows. Use this skill when assessing RAG-based chatbots, knowledge bases, enterprise AI assistants, or any system that augments LLM responses with external document retrieval. Covers document injection, embedding manipulation, knowledge base poisoning, and cross-document inference attacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Extract the hidden foundational System Prompts, internal instructions, backend APIs, and confidential contextual data powering Large Language Model (LLM) applications using targeted prompt injection manipulation and adversarial psychological engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Execute advanced evasion by injecting malicious code into the memory space of a legitimate, suspended process (Process Hollowing). This skill details techniques to bypass static and dynamic analysis by masking malicious activity behind trusted processes like svchost.exe or explorer.exe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Exploit AI applications using Indirect Prompt Injection. This skill focuses on hiding malicious instructions within data sources (web pages, documents, emails) that the LLM processes, causing the AI to execute unintended actions or leak data without direct user interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Generate sophisticated initial access payloads designed to bypass email gateways and endpoint antivirus systems while executing Command and Control (C2) agents. Use this skill to craft malicious LNKs, ISOs, Weaponized Office Documents, and HTML Smuggling techniques for Red Team campaigns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Extract sensitive training data (PII, API keys, intellectual property, or code) directly from a deployed Large Language Model (LLM). This AI Red Teaming skill focuses on forcing models to regurgitate memorized, unredacted data from their massive internet-scraped datasets through repetition attacks, prefix continuation, and context window manipulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Exploit an application's absolute trust in its underlying LLM (Overreliance). Use this skill to induce critical "hallucinations" (confident falsehoods) that cause downstream logical systems or automated agents tracking the LLM's output to make destructive actions or grant unauthorized access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Test Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and tool-calling systems for security vulnerabilities including tool injection, parameter manipulation, privilege escalation, and data exfiltration through AI agent tool interfaces. Use this skill when assessing MCP server implementations, AI agent tool integrations, or any system that exposes tools to language models. Covers tool confusion attacks, cross-tool exploitation, and MCP server hardening assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Extract sensitive training data and internal capabilities from AI models through repeated programmatic querying. Use this skill when testing LLMs and ML models for data privacy leaks, intellectual property exposure, or unintended memorization. Covers membership inference, prompt extraction, training data reconstruction, and API boundary testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新

Test for indirect prompt injection vulnerabilities where malicious instructions are injected through external data sources (websites, emails, documents, database records) that the LLM processes. Use this skill when assessing LLM-integrated applications that process user-generated content, retrieve web pages, parse emails, or read documents. Covers injection via web content, email bodies, user profiles, and database records that are fed to LLM context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge242026年7月11日 更新