「rollout」の検索結果

Configures the rollout shape of a PostHog experiment — the variant split (50/50, 80/20, A/B/C ratios), the overall rollout percentage that gates how many users enter the experiment, and the disambiguation when a percentage like "roll out to 25%" could mean either. Use when the user mentions a rollout percentage, variant split, or traffic distribution; gives a ratio like 60/40, 70/30, or 80/20; asks "who sees the test variant?"; wants to increase, decrease, or change the rollout or split on a draft or running experiment; weighs equal vs uneven splits; or proposes a mid-experiment split change (often an anti-pattern that needs reset or end-and-restart).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding, retiring, or auditing feature flags. Triggers on "add a flag", "ship behind a flag", "rollout plan", "kill switch", "stale flags", "flag debt", "LaunchDarkly", "GrowthBook", "Statsig", "Unleash", "Flipt", or any progressive-delivery question. Ships flag debt scanner, rollout planner, and kill-switch auditor (all stdlib Python), 4 references on flag taxonomy + provider trade-offs + rollout strategies + lifecycle, plus a /flag-cleanup slash command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safe-release techniques DURING rollout: feature flags, progressive rollouts, canary analysis, guardrail metrics, production smoke tests, and synthetic users. Bridges QA and SRE practices. Use when: "feature flag testing," "canary deploy," "progressive rollout," "guardrail metrics," "dark launch," "safe rollout." Not for: scheduled probes that run continuously after release — use `synthetic-monitoring`. Not for: designing tests from prod telemetry — use `observability-driven-testing`. Related: release-readiness, synthetic-monitoring, observability-driven-testing, qa-metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An Agentforce agent is moving from build or sandbox to live end-user traffic and the team needs a comprehensive readiness gate: coverage testing, Trust Layer config, guardrails, cost telemetry, observability, rate limits, permissions, rollout strategy, rollback plan, performance benchmarks. Triggers: 'we want to ship our Agentforce agent next week', 'pre-prod readiness review for our Service Agent', 'what do we need before turning the agent on for real customers', 'agent went live and is hallucinating, what should we have caught', 'cost monitoring for our internal sales agent', 'rollout strategy from internal pilot to GA'. NOT for the lighter five-block activation sign-off artifact — use agentforce/agent-deployment-checklist. NOT for authoring the guardrails themselves — use agentforce/agentforce-guardrails. NOT for building the test harness — use agentforce/agentforce-eval-harness. NOT for Trust Layer feature setup in isolation — use agentforce/einstein-trust-layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The operational playbook for launching a feature well. Positioning, internal alignment, customer comms, sales enablement, support readiness, rollout strategy, monitoring with pre-defined rollback triggers, post-launch measurement against spec hypotheses, and the discipline that distinguishes shipping from releasing from actually launching. Triggers on launch plan, feature launch, launch checklist, ship vs release, rollout strategy, gradual rollout, sales enablement, support readiness, launch announcement, post-launch measurement, launch failure, declared victory too early. Also triggers when planning a launch (any size, any segment), auditing an existing launch process, fixing the we shipped it but the metric did not move problem, or building a launch checklist for the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute a new brand launch — from internal rollout to public debut. Use when the user says "launch the brand", "brand launch plan", "how do we introduce the brand", "brand reveal", "brand debut", "going public with the brand", "announcing the new brand", "brand launch strategy", "pre-launch brand", "brand rollout", "introducing our brand to the market", or is ready to take a new or refreshed brand from internal to external. Also use for soft launches, hard launches, and phased rollouts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate release readiness with evidence-based go/no-go decisions. Covers go/no-go checklists, smoke test suite design, staged rollout validation, rollback criteria and procedures, and post-deployment verification. Ensures release confidence comes from data, not feelings. Use when: "release ready," "go/no-go," "smoke test," "release checklist," "rollback plan," "staged rollout," "canary deploy." Not for: safe-release techniques (flags, canary, dark launch) applied during the rollout itself — use testing-in-production; scheduled probes that run continuously after release — use synthetic-monitoring; designing new tests from prod telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: testing-in-production, qa-metrics, ci-cd-integration, ai-system-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and execute A/B tests for ML models in production using traffic splitting, statistical significance testing, and canary/shadow deployment strategies. Measure performance differences and make data-driven decisions about model rollout. Use when validating a new model version before full rollout, comparing candidate models trained with different algorithms, measuring business metric impact of model changes, or when regulatory requirements mandate gradual rollout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Busabase-backed App-in-Skill dashboard for a shared LLM gateway's cost and model governance — daily spend trend, cost breakdown by service/model, a canary-rollout status board, and a deterministic cost/error anomaly list. Use when the user invokes $kelly-llm-gateway or /kelly-llm-gateway, or wants to review LLM gateway spend, model routing, canary rollouts, rollback readiness, or cost/error anomalies for services routed through one shared gateway to multiple LLM providers/models. Human actions (promote/rollback/hold a rollout, acknowledge an anomaly) write directly onto the route's own Busabase record — this skill never changes a real routing config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides agents through the 3-step experiment creation flow: defining the hypothesis, configuring rollout, and setting up analytics. Delegates rollout decisions to configuring-experiment-rollout and metric setup to configuring-experiment-analytics. TRIGGER when: user asks to create a new experiment or A/B test, OR when you are about to call experiment-create. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user is updating an existing experiment, managing lifecycle, or only browsing experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure design/ADR changes include a concrete migration plan, rollout strategy, rollback conditions, and compatibility considerations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

候補の探索や比較を繰り返し、試行の根拠と判断を追記型の台帳に残すスキル。前回との整合性や再検証の結果を確認し、実取引や本番操作へ進む条件を明確にします。

• 試行を重ねて候補を比較したいとき
• 判断の根拠を記録したいとき
• 新情報で前回の採用候補を見直したいとき

正解が一つに定まらない判断を、長期的な影響、前提への疑問、実行の現実性、失敗リスクの四つの視点で検討し、反対意見も見える形で推奨案をまとめるスキル。

• 今すぐ公開するか改善を待つか決めたいとき
• 段階的展開と一斉展開を比較したいとき
• 範囲の縮小と長期的な狙いを検討したいとき

OpenDesign's enterprise AI-adoption brief: local-first agents at work, the risk controls, the ROI, and the rollout plan. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for leadership, IT, security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive rollout plans with preflight checks, step-by-step deployment, verification signals, rollback procedures, and communication plans for infrastructure and application changes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Head of People Ops, BizOps lead, or Internal Communications owner needs to draft and sequence an internal-only change-management communication — a re-org announcement, a tool rollout, a policy change, a leadership transition, a layoff, an acquisition close, or an internal product launch — and the audience is employees (not customers). Pairs Prosci ADKAR and Kotter's 8-step change model with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a sequenced touchpoint calendar, a Kotter-compliant primary announcement, an audience-segmented FAQ, and manager cascade talking points; industry-tuned via --profile {tech-startup, scaleup, enterprise, public-company, non-profit}. Triggers on "all-hands announcement", "change comms", "rollout comms", "re-org announcement", "manager talking points", "layoff comms".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly reusable-session feature-flag cleanup for {{target_repo}}. Inventories every feature flag, classifies each as fully rolled out, long dead, partial rollout, or active experiment, removes the flag and the dead branch it guards on an isolated branch when the suite is green, and opens a PR — never touching a flag still mid-rollout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a specific Codex CLI session by session ID — correlate the local rollout transcript (`~/.codex/sessions/YYYY/MM/DD/rollout-*-<SESSION_ID>.jsonl`) with the router's production logs to understand what Codex rendered vs. what the upstream served on the /v1/responses path. Use when given a session ID and asked "why did X render?" (missing thinking, missing routing marker, wrong model, tool-call weirdness) for a Codex conversation routed through the router.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Releasing an iOS or Android app through the stores -- signing, the privacy manifest, a TestFlight or Play beta, a staged rollout, a hotfix: prepare each gate the store enforces, and plan the halt and the next build before the rollout starts, because a store release cannot be rolled back. Use when the user says: mobile-release, mobile release, mobile app release, ios release, android release, app store release, app store submission, submit to the app store.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and control a staged Abridge rollout across clinical cohorts and EHR workflows without pretending to deploy vendor infrastructure. Use when preparing an Abridge pilot or expansion. Trigger with "plan the Abridge rollout".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Für Rollout Mail Bestandskunden: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Für Rollout Monitoring AGB: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。