本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

feature-flags-architect

Use when adding, retiring, or auditing feature flags. Triggers on "add a flag", "ship behind a flag", "rollout plan", "kill switch", "stale flags", "flag debt", "LaunchDarkly", "GrowthBook", "Statsig", "Unleash", "Flipt", or any progressive-delivery question. Ships flag debt scanner, rollout planner, and kill-switch auditor (all stdlib Python), 4 references on flag taxonomy + provider trade-offs + rollout strategies + lifecycle, plus a /flag-cleanup slash command.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(9)

  • SKILL.md9.6 KB
  • assets/flag_request_template.md1.7 KB
  • references/flag_lifecycle.md5.7 KB
  • references/flag_taxonomy.md4.4 KB
  • references/provider_comparison.md5.0 KB
  • references/rollout_strategies.md4.9 KB
  • scripts/flag_debt_scanner.py4.7 KB
  • scripts/kill_switch_audit.py4.9 KB
  • scripts/rollout_planner.py4.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Feature Flags Architect

End-to-end discipline for feature flags: classify them, ship them, ramp them, and retire them. Most teams treat flags as throwaway if-statements; this skill treats them as a controlled lifecycle with measurable debt.

When to use

  • Adding a new flag and need a rollout plan
  • Auditing a codebase for stale or orphaned flags
  • Choosing a flag provider (LaunchDarkly vs GrowthBook vs Statsig vs Unleash vs Flipt vs build-your-own)
  • Designing a kill-switch path for a risky launch
  • Cleaning up flag debt before a release freeze
  • Reviewing whether a feature should ship behind a flag at all

Core principle: flags are a lifecycle, not an if

request → design → ship → ramp → cleanup → archive

Flags that skip cleanup become debt: dead branches, stale defaults, untested code paths, unbounded blast radius. The three scripts in this skill enforce the lifecycle.

Quick start

# 1. Audit the repo for flag debt
python scripts/flag_debt_scanner.py --repo . --max-age-days 90

# 2. Plan a progressive rollout for a new flag
python scripts/rollout_planner.py --population 100000 --target-percent 100 --duration-days 14 --strategy ring

# 3. Verify every flag has a documented kill switch
python scripts/kill_switch_audit.py --repo . --flag-doc docs/feature-flags.md

The 4 flag types (taxonomy)

Different flag types have different lifespans and ownership. Misclassifying creates debt.

TypePurposeTypical lifespanOwnerCleanup trigger
ReleaseHide unfinished features in productiondays–weeksEng100% rollout reached
ExperimentA/B test variantsweeksProduct/MarketingTest concluded; winner picked
OperationalCircuit breakers, perf toggles, kill switchesmonths–yearsEng/SREReplaced by autoscaling/feature retirement
PermissionEntitlements per user/account/planyears (permanent)ProductPlan/role removed

Only Release and Experiment flags should be on a debt-scanner watchlist. Operational and Permission flags are by design long-lived. See references/flag_taxonomy.md for decision tree.

The 3 Python tools

All three are stdlib-only. Run with --help.

flag_debt_scanner.py

Finds flags older than --max-age-days with low usage, suggesting candidates for cleanup.

python scripts/flag_debt_scanner.py --repo . --max-age-days 90 --format text
python scripts/flag_debt_scanner.py --repo . --max-age-days 60 --format json > debt.json

Detection heuristic:

  1. Walk --repo for code references matching common flag-call patterns:
    • flag("..."), isFlagEnabled("..."), featureFlag("..."), getFlag("...")
    • client.variation("...", ...), unleash.isEnabled("..."), growthbook.feature("...")
  2. For each unique flag identifier, find the oldest commit that introduced it (git log --diff-filter=A -S <name>).
  3. Flag as DEBT if introduced > --max-age-days ago AND used in ≤--min-uses places.

Outputs flag name, age in days, file references, suggested action. JSON mode is CI-friendly.

rollout_planner.py

Generates a phased rollout schedule from population size, target percent, duration, and strategy.

python scripts/rollout_planner.py --population 100000 --target-percent 100 --duration-days 14 --strategy ring
python scripts/rollout_planner.py --population 50000 --target-percent 25 --duration-days 7 --strategy linear
python scripts/rollout_planner.py --population 1000000 --target-percent 100 --duration-days 30 --strategy log

Strategies:

  • ring: 1% → 5% → 25% → 50% → 100%, evenly spaced. Default for risky launches.
  • linear: constant rate per day. Default for medium-risk.
  • log: rapid early, slow tail. Default for low-risk launches with confidence.
  • cohort: by named cohort (internal → beta → free → paid → all).

Outputs a markdown table with date, percent, expected user count, abort criteria, and verification step per phase.

kill_switch_audit.py

Cross-references code-discovered flags against documentation to verify each has a kill switch path written down.

python scripts/kill_switch_audit.py --repo . --flag-doc docs/feature-flags.md
python scripts/kill_switch_audit.py --repo . --flag-doc runbooks/flags.md --format json

What it checks:

  1. Every code-discovered flag has an entry in --flag-doc
  2. Each entry declares: owner, type, kill-switch trigger, monitoring dashboard
  3. Reports flags missing documentation (FAIL) or missing fields (WARN)

Use as a pre-merge gate before any new flag ships.

Provider chooser (5 + DIY)

ProviderBest forPricing modelLock-in riskOSS option
LaunchDarklyEnterprise, complex targeting, audit/compliancePer-MAU, expensiveHighNo
GrowthBookMid-market, A/B testing focused, OSS-friendlyPer-MAU + OSSLowYes (self-host)
StatsigGrowth/product teams, advanced experimentationFree tier + per-MAUMediumNo
UnleashOSS-first, self-hosted, dev-friendlyOSS + EnterpriseLowYes
FliptLightweight, k8s-native, simple needsOSS-onlyNoneYes
DIY<100 flags, no targeting, full controlNoneNoneN/A

Decision rules:

  • <50 flags + no targeting → DIY with config file or env vars
  • Need analytics + experimentation → Statsig or GrowthBook
  • Compliance/SOC2 audit logs required → LaunchDarkly
  • Self-hosting required (data residency / air-gapped) → Unleash or Flipt
  • See references/provider_comparison.md for detail.

Workflows

Workflow 1: Ship a new feature behind a flag

1. Classify: which of the 4 flag types?
   → Release (most common for engineering work)
2. Run rollout_planner.py to design the ramp
3. Add flag entry to docs/feature-flags.md BEFORE writing code:
   - name, owner, type, kill-switch trigger, dashboard URL
4. Write the code with the flag
5. Run kill_switch_audit.py — must pass before merge
6. Deploy at 0%; verify kill switch works
7. Execute rollout schedule; abort if abort criteria met
8. At 100% for 7+ days: remove flag, delete dead branch, archive doc entry

Workflow 2: Quarterly flag cleanup

1. Run flag_debt_scanner.py --repo . --max-age-days 90 > debt.md
2. For each flagged item:
   a. Confirm it reached 100% (or was killed)
   b. Find the issue/PR that introduced it; verify owner agrees to remove
   c. Delete dead branches; remove flag config
   d. Run kill_switch_audit.py — should now show one fewer flag
3. Update CHANGELOG: "Removed N stale flags"

Workflow 3: Choose a provider

1. Estimate flag count (current + 12-month projection)
2. Required features:
   - Targeting rules (user, account, geo, %)?
   - A/B testing + stats?
   - Audit log / SOC2?
   - Self-hosting / data residency?
3. Pricing budget (MAU * cost-per-MAU)
4. See provider_comparison.md decision tree
5. Build a 30-day proof-of-concept before signing

Workflow 4: Design a kill switch

1. Identify the failure modes:
   - Latency spike (which threshold?)
   - Error rate spike (which threshold?)
   - Business metric regression (which threshold?)
2. Wire each to an abort:
   - Manual: dashboard link + on-call playbook
   - Automated: alert threshold flips flag back to 0%
3. Test the kill switch in staging BEFORE production rollout
4. Document in flag-doc; pass kill_switch_audit.py

References

  • references/flag_taxonomy.md — 4 types, decision tree, ownership, lifespan
  • references/provider_comparison.md — LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Statsig / Unleash / Flipt / DIY trade-offs
  • references/rollout_strategies.md — ring / linear / log / cohort / geo, abort criteria, monitoring
  • references/flag_lifecycle.md — request → design → ship → ramp → cleanup → archive

Slash command

/flag-cleanup — Run the full cleanup workflow on the current repo: scan for debt, generate a removal plan, audit kill switches.

Asset templates

  • assets/flag_request_template.md — fill-in form for new flag requests (name, owner, type, kill switch, rollout plan)

Anti-patterns

  • Permanent flag with if (FLAG_FOO) 50 places — should be a Permission flag with a runtime config, not a Release flag
  • Flag with no owner — when the original engineer leaves, no one cleans it up
  • No kill switch documented — when the feature breaks, no one knows how to disable it
  • A/B test that ran 6 months — pick a winner; running indefinitely is debt
  • Flags as feature toggles for cosmetic changes — ship via deploy, not flag

Verifiable success

A team using this skill should achieve:

  • 100% of new flags pass kill_switch_audit.py at merge time
  • flag_debt_scanner.py --max-age-days 90 returns ≤5 stale flags repo-wide
  • Every flag has a documented owner, type, and kill switch
  • Mean time to retire a Release flag: <60 days from 100% rollout

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する