「team」の検索結果

Codex-only team orchestration: run a named team of cooperating Codex workers with durable, script-managed state. MUST USE when the user asks Codex to create, run, coordinate, inspect, archive, or delete a team of agents/threads/sessions, or to work on something as a team in parallel. FIRST inspects the active tool surface (checking tool_search for deferred tools) and tells the user the route: native MultiAgentV2 agents (flat spawn_agent with task_name) when available, Codex App threads as the fallback, or a plain-subagent split when neither set exists. The main session is always the leader; members are defined by a concrete part, ownership area, or perspective - never a vague job role; a bundled cross-platform script writes the .omo/teams state plus an auto-generated member field manual. Use a team when the work is not perfectly isolated but parallelizing helps; use plain subagents when scope is perfectly isolated or the goal is ambiguous. Triggers: team mode, teammode, make a team, run as a team, team of agents, coordinate threads, parallel Codex threads, archive the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to CONNECT Microsoft Teams (`kortix channels connect --platform teams`, prints a tenant-admin consent URL) and how to answer in Teams as a teammate. Covers the live Adaptive Card stream (`teams step` with --detail/--output/--source, `teams send` to finalize the answer), sending and downloading files (the consent-card upload flow + `teams download`), reading teams/channels/members through connector calls, asking the user, and the tone the bot should use. Load this when the turn is triggered from Teams (the prompt mentions a Teams tenant/conversation, or `$MS_TEAMS_CONVERSATION_ID` is set in the env), or when the user asks how to do anything in Teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex-only team orchestration: run a named team of cooperating Codex workers with durable, script-managed state. MUST USE when the user asks Codex to create, run, coordinate, inspect, archive, or delete a team of agents/threads/sessions, or to work on something as a team in parallel. FIRST inspects the active tool surface (checking tool_search for deferred tools) and tells the user the route: native MultiAgentV2 agents (flat spawn_agent with task_name) when available, Codex App threads as the fallback, or a plain-subagent split when neither set exists. The main session is always the leader; members are defined by a concrete part, ownership area, or perspective - never a vague job role; a bundled cross-platform script writes the .omo/teams state plus an auto-generated member field manual. Use a team when the work is not perfectly isolated but parallelizing helps; use plain subagents when scope is perfectly isolated or the goal is ambiguous. Triggers: team mode, teammode, make a team, run as a team, team of agents, coordinate threads, parallel Codex threads, archive the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize business and technology teams for fast flow using Skelton & Pais's "Team Topologies". Use when the user mentions "team topologies", "Conway's law", "platform team", "stream-aligned team", "team boundaries", "cognitive load", "how should we split teams", "who owns this service", "team dependencies", or "reorg". Also trigger when reorganizing engineering teams, aligning team and service boundaries, splitting a monolith and deciding ownership, reducing cross-team handoffs, or designing an internal platform. Covers the four team types, three interaction modes, the inverse Conway maneuver, and fracture planes. For bounded contexts, see domain-driven-design. For dependency direction in code, see clean-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your team has high autonomy — and standups are vague, weekly meetings drift into status reports, and 1:1s produce nothing but "I'm fine." This playbook fixes all three layers at once. What's inside: • Daily Standup system — 3-field format, good sample, 4 COO principles to keep it honest • Weekly Meeting — strict 25-min agenda, Scrum Master rotation, 0–10 pulse check • 1:1 Framework — 9-dimension quantified pulse, 5-group deep question bank, bilateral feedback structure • Diagnostic layer — "stuck-at" detection: info / authority / collaboration / capability / direction • FAQ for 4 common failure modes (dead standups, status-report meetings, "I'm fine" 1:1s, scaling beyond 10 people) 🇨🇳 你的团队自由度很高——但 standup 越来越糊，例会变成汇报，1:1 问不出真话。这套三层 Motivation 操作手册解决的正是这件事：standup 是信息层，例会是对齐层，1:1 是个人层。三件事做好了，motivation 不是管出来的，是长出来的。 🇯🇵 チームの自律性は高いのに、スタンドアップは曖昧で、週次ミーティングは進捗報告になり、1on1では「大丈夫です」しか返ってこない——このプレイブックは、その3層すべてを同時に解決します。 🇰🇷 팀의 자율성은 높은데 스탠드업은 두루뭉술하고, 주간 회의는 진척 보고가 되어버리고, 1:1에서는 진심을 들을 수 없다면 — 이 플레이북이 세 레이어 모두를 동시에 해결합니다. Triggers: "团队 motivation" | "standup 没人写" | "例会变成汇报" | "1:1 问不出真话" | "高自由度团队管理" | "COO 如何管人" | "team motivation" | "standup best practices" | "1on1 framework" | "weekly meeting template" | "チームモチベーション" | "팀 동기부여" | "AI startup team ops" | "remote team alignment" | "engagement下降"

Plan, scope, and execute an authorized red-team engagement — distinct from a penetration test. Covers engagement methodology, assumed-breach scenarios, ATT&CK emulation plans, rules of engagement, deconfliction with the blue team, post-engagement debriefs, and the program-level work that makes red teams actually improve defenses. Use when the user mentions 'red team,' 'red team engagement,' 'red teaming,' 'adversary emulation,' 'ATT&CK emulation,' 'assumed breach,' 'purple team exercise,' 'tabletop with technical execution,' 'red team scope,' 'rules of engagement,' 'red team RoE,' 'deconfliction,' 'red team debrief,' or wants to design or run a red-team engagement against systems with authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Teams スキルを設計・構築するためのベストプラクティスガイド。 サブエージェント定義、SendMessage 通信プロトコル、タスク依存管理、 PostToolUse Hook によるログ、MCP ツール統合、コンテキストファイル設計を網羅。 7つの実績あるチームスキル（app-naming, ui-review, logo-design, persona-creation, skill-creator-team, ui-variations, aso-optimize）から抽出したパターン集。 Use when: Agent Teams を使ったスキルを新規作成したい、 既存のチームスキルの品質を改善したい、エージェント間通信のデバッグ、 チームスキルの設計パターンを知りたい。 Triggers: "agent team", "チームスキル", "エージェントチーム", "サブエージェント定義", "SendMessage パターン", "チーム設計", "エージェント間通信", "team skill", "swarm pattern"

承認済みのteam-opencode計画（task-list.json）をAgent Teamsで並行実行。 Wave式チーム実行→レビューフィードバック→クリーンアップ。 Trigger: dev:team-opencode-exec, /dev:team-opencode-exec, チーム実行, team exec

承認済みの team-plan 計画（task-list.json）を Agent Teams + Subagent ハイブリッドで並行実行。 Git Worktree でファイル分離。Delegate mode / Plan Approval / hooks にフル準拠。 Trigger: dev:team-run, /dev:team-run, チーム実行, team run

運用者が設定したTeamサーバーの更新を、指定担当のNight Watchに引き継ぎ、既存の更新機構による検証・復旧・完了確認まで進めるスキル。

• Teamを公式mainへ更新したいとき
• 失敗・延期した更新の続行調整
• データベース移行と復旧の調整

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a team", "spawn agents", "assign tasks", "coordinate multiple agents", "check team status", "view kanban board", "send messages between agents", "manage team tasks", "monitor team progress", or mentions "clawteam", legacy "oh", "multi-agent coordination", "team collaboration", "agent inbox", "task board", "spawn worker". This skill should also be triggered when the current task is complex enough to benefit from splitting into subtasks and delegating to multiple agents — for example when the user asks to "build a full-stack app", "refactor the entire codebase", "implement multiple features in parallel", or when the agent determines that the work scope exceeds what a single agent can efficiently handle alone. Provides comprehensive guidance for using the ClawTeam CLI to orchestrate multi-agent teams with task management, messaging, monitoring, runtime profiles, git context, and recovery tooling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Microsoft Teamsの会議を要約し、対応事項を抽出します。要約が届かない原因の確認や、保存済み処理の再実行、会議通知の購読管理も支援するスキル。

• 会議の要約と対応事項の抽出
• 会議要約が届かない原因調査
• 失敗した会議処理の再実行

承認済みの実装計画（Plan）を Agent Team で並列に実装するスキル。 Plan をタスクに分割 → 依存関係を設定 → Wave ごとに並列エージェントを起動 → 完了を待って次の Wave → 最後にビルド＆テスト検証。 team-plan スキル（調査→計画）の後に使う「実装実行フェーズ」。 Use when: 計画を並列に実装したい、チームで実装を進めたい、 Wave 実行で効率よくコードを書きたい。 Triggers: "team implement", "チームで実装", "並列実装", "plan を実装して", "wave 実行", "team-implement", "エージェントで実装", "実装フェーズ", "implement the plan"

Prepare and verify Microsoft Teams desktop chat drafts with Windows UI Automation, stopping before send. Use for Teamsチャット下書き, デスクトップTeams操作, 宛先確認, メッセージ入力, or when Teams Web/CDP is unavailable.

Claude Code の並列エージェント(agent teams・teammate)の後始末と無応答時の打ち切りルール。`name` を付けて Agent を起動するとき、TeamCreate でチームを組むとき、teammate から `idle_notification` が届いたとき、評価ループ等で次のイテレーションのエージェントを起動する前、エージェントの返信が届かないときに参照する。`name` を付けない通常のサブエージェント起動だけなら対象外。

Inspect, debug, and inject custom code into a running Steam client — desktop (macOS, Linux, Windows) or Steam Deck over the network — through its Chromium Embedded Framework (CEF) Chrome DevTools Protocol endpoint. Use when developing Steam UI plugins, mods, themes, or integrations — injecting CSS/JS to try a change, locating webpack modules and obfuscated class names, reading React or SteamUIStore state, inspecting Big Picture / Quick Access Menu windows, screenshotting what actually rendered, streaming console logs, or diagnosing runtime errors in Steam's UI. The same commands run against either device, or both at once. Injection is per-session and for development only. Not for building a plugin loader or making changes persist across restarts, Steamworks game SDK work, game development, or scraping the public Steam web store.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Team（tmux + TeamCreate）で並列実装する開発フロー。「エージェントチームフロー」「workflow-agent-team」「Agent Team で実装」「チームで実装」「チーム並列開発」などで起動。Issue/PR まで作るかは発話・引数から判断し、曖昧なら確認する。

チーム実装計画を作成。ストーリー分析→タスク分解→レビュー（opencode）。 計画は docs/FEATURES/team/{YYMMDD}_{slug}/ に永続化され、複数保持可能。 Trigger: dev:team-plan, /dev:team-plan, チーム計画, team plan

Evolve an existing team composition by refining its structure in-place or creating a specialized variant. Covers assessing the current team against template and coordination patterns, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (adjust members, change coordination pattern, split/merge teams), applying changes to the team file and CONFIG block, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when a team's member roster is outdated, coordination pattern no longer fits, user feedback reveals workflow gaps, a specialized variant is needed alongside the original, or agents have been added or removed from the library affecting team composition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an empowered team brief. Use when the user says "team brief", "product brief", "give the team a problem", "empowered team", "how do I brief engineering", "delegate to the team", "product mission", or wants to give a team clear goals without dictating the solution - even if they don't say "team brief".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether your leadership behaviors amplify or diminish your team using Liz Wiseman's Multipliers framework. Use when a leader asks "am I a good manager", "why isn't my team performing at their potential", "I feel like I'm doing all the thinking for my team", "my team seems dependent on me", "I want to be a better leader", "how do I empower my people", or "my team is smart but underperforming". Also trigger when someone describes always having the best ideas in the room, team members not taking initiative, reports waiting for direction before acting, or a leader who feels exhausted from carrying the team. Diminisher patterns are often invisible to the leader exhibiting them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish or update a game on Steam with Steamworks and SteamPipe: configure depots and packages, upload builds with steamcmd, set a build live on a branch, and run the release checklists. Use for Steam publishing, app_build.vdf/steamcmd uploads, depots, beta branches, or a store page release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Team structure, gearing analysis, continuity planning, and competing demand management for legal matters. Use when setting up a matter team, reviewing whether work is being done at the right grade, planning cover for an unavailable team member, or managing a resource conflict across matters. Trigger on: 'who should be on this matter', 'team structure', 'gearing', 'right people at the right level', 'partner is doing associate work', 'cover for maternity leave', 'who has capacity', 'team member leaving', 'over-allocated', 'staffing conflict', 'pinch point', 'capacity problem', 'how do we resource this', 'team too senior', 'team too junior'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a leader assigns work to a marketing team member or runs a cross-functional meeting — a task brief with concrete deliverables, a deadline with time and timezone, a definition of done, constraints, and check-in points, plus an async-first meeting agenda and action-item template. Trigger on 'assign a task', 'brief for my team', 'team brief', 'definition of done', 'meeting agenda template', 'my team keeps delivering the wrong thing'. Also use when the user says nobody knows who owns what. Not for — the campaign brief the whole team executes from, see `02-campaign-brief-global`; briefing an external agency or freelancer, see `67-agency-vendor-brief-global`; evaluating performance, see `65-team-performance-review-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。