本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

scan-sys

Use when: analysing a project's architecture, structure, and infrastructure health from the System perspective.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

System Perspective (SYS)

Evaluates the structural and architectural health of a codebase. Assigns a score from 0.0 to 1.0 across three dimensions.

Dimensions

Complexity — Are individual files understandable, and how much surrounding context does a change pull in?

  • Blends two signals, 50/50:
    • Line-count heuristic: files exceeding 300 lines are a signal of creeping complexity; each oversized file reduces this half of the score proportionally
    • Real coupling signal: a JS/TS dependency-graph engine computes fan-out (how many internal modules a file imports) per module; modules importing more than 10 internal dependencies reduce this half of the score proportionally

Cohesion — Are responsibilities well-grouped, and is the module graph actually acyclic?

  • Blends two signals, 50/50:
    • Directory-count heuristic: directories with more than 20 source files have too many concerns; each overloaded directory reduces this half of the score proportionally
    • Real cycle-detection signal: the same dependency-graph engine performs hard cycle detection over the JS/TS import graph (DFS with a recursion-stack walk); modules involved in any import cycle reduce this half of the score proportionally — a cycle is a direct, hard signal that two or more modules are not well-separated

Infrastructure — Is the project properly configured?

  • TypeScript: If no .ts files are present, marked N/A; otherwise tsconfig.json present = 1.0, missing = 0.0
  • CI/CD health is assessed by scan-anl; see that skill for pipeline evaluation

The dependency-graph engine

A pure JS/Node module (pipelines/deploy/lib/dep-graph.js, no TypeScript compiler API, no tree-sitter, no native/compiled dependency) parses a project's .ts/.tsx/.js/.jsx files with regex-based specifier extraction (import/export ... from, dynamic import(), and require()), resolves relative specifiers to files inside the project, and builds a module-level import graph. Bare/package specifiers (e.g. react, node:fs) are external and excluded from the graph — only project-internal edges count toward cycles and coupling. The engine reports two real metrics per scan: dependency cycles (with the modules involved) and fan-in/fan-out coupling per module. Python and other non-JS/TS languages are not yet covered.

This is a separate implementation from the ticket-dependency-cycle check the task-tracking CLI uses internally — that one walks ticket ids, not code imports, and the two are never conflated.

Graphify preference (tier-aware)

On tiers where Graphify is available, scan-sys checks for an already-generated .graphify/<project>/graphify-out/graph.json before running its own source scan. Graphify produces a richer, real call/import graph than dep-graph.js's own regex-based extraction; when the file is present and parses as a valid Graphify graph, its imports_from edges (file-to-file import relations — distinct from Graphify's symbol-level imports/contains/calls edges) are used to build the same module-level import graph shape, and cycles/coupling are computed from that instead.

Graphify is optional and derived, never canonical — running it is a separate, explicit step (npm run graph:generate), and its absence is never an error. When no graph.json exists for a project — whether Graphify was never run, or the tier doesn't ship Graphify at all — scan-sys falls back to dep-graph.js's own source scan unconditionally, on every tier. This preference check happens fresh on every scan; a stale graph.json (regenerated less recently than the source it describes) is still preferred over a fresh source scan, since Graphify's own graphify update command is how a project keeps its graph current, not scan-sys.

Scoring

sys_score = (complexity + cohesion + infrastructure) / 3

Score interpretation:

  • 0.9–1.0 Architecture is clean, well-structured, and properly configured
  • 0.7–0.9 Minor structural issues — manageable with targeted refactors
  • 0.5–0.7 Significant coupling or cohesion problems — plan a structural pass
  • 0.0–0.5 Architecture debt is blocking productivity — prioritise before new features

Tasks Generated

FindingPriority
Source files > 300 lines (>3 files)high
Source files > 300 lines (≤3 files)medium
Modules with fan-out > 10 internal dependenciesmedium
Directories > 20 source filesmedium
Import cycles found (>3 cycles)high
Import cycles found (≤3 cycles)medium
tsconfig.json missing (TS project)high

Agent Analysis Guide

When performing a manual SYS analysis:

  1. Count source files per directory — flag any over 20
  2. Measure file lengths — flag anything over 300 lines and note the dominant concern
  3. Check for tsconfig.json only if .ts files are present; verify strict: true is set; mark TypeScript N/A if no .ts files found
  4. Look for real circular imports (the dependency-graph engine detects these automatically for JS/TS; for other languages, trace import statements manually) and cross-layer dependencies (service importing from controller, etc.)
  5. Look for modules with unusually high fan-out — importing many internal dependencies is itself a complexity signal, independent of line count
  6. Identify God objects — single classes or modules that do too many things

Output: a ranked list of structural issues, each with the file or directory, the dimension it violates, and a recommended remediation.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Universal guardrails loaded by every agent. Defines Verify Before Reporting (VBR), Write-Ahead Log (WAL), and the security baseline. Always-on, role-independent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月7日 更新

Use when: architecture mode, architect this, ADR, C4, PlantUML, system boundary, design decision, PRD gap, high ambiguity, multiple technical approaches, security architecture, data architecture, integration risk, implementability gap, story ticket, or epic ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月7日 更新

Use when: assumptions audit, audit assumptions, check for hidden assumptions, plan/ticket has ambiguous scope edges, pre-flight before finalizing a ticket, unstated assumptions, or 'what am I assuming'. Surfaces unstated assumptions, ambiguous scope edges, and untested preconditions in a finished plan/ticket/ADR before it is handed to Builder. Optional pass — Architect judges when to apply it; not a mandatory gate on every ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月7日 更新

Use when: Tester needs UI state evidence for VBR, or Builder needs to verify an integration wire is observable end-to-end. Powered by agent-browser MCP — token-efficient browser automation (200–400 tokens/page).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月7日 更新

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月7日 更新

Writing skill for freelancers and independent consultants. Covers project proposals, bids, client emails, and scope summaries. Leads with the client's problem, not the consultant's background.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agistra/agistra.dev52026年10月7日 更新

Agistra のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する