本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

aws-solution-architect

Design AWS architectures for startups using serverless patterns and IaC templates. Use when asked to design serverless architecture, create CloudFormation templates, optimize AWS costs, set up CI/CD pipelines, or migrate to AWS. Covers Lambda, API Gateway, DynamoDB, ECS, Aurora, and cost optimization.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(9)

  • SKILL.md9.8 KB
  • assets/expected_output.json1.5 KB
  • assets/sample_input.json426 B
  • references/architecture_patterns.md17.1 KB
  • references/best_practices.md14.2 KB
  • references/service_selection.md11.1 KB
  • scripts/architecture_designer.py34.8 KB
  • scripts/cost_optimizer.py15.3 KB
  • scripts/serverless_stack.py17.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

AWS Solution Architect

Design scalable, cost-effective AWS architectures for startups with infrastructure-as-code templates.


Workflow

Step 1: Gather Requirements

Collect application specifications:

- Application type (web app, mobile backend, data pipeline, SaaS)
- Expected users and requests per second
- Budget constraints (monthly spend limit)
- Team size and AWS experience level
- Compliance requirements (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2)
- Availability requirements (SLA, RPO/RTO)

Step 2: Design Architecture

Run the architecture designer to get pattern recommendations:

python scripts/architecture_designer.py --input requirements.json

Example output:

{
  "recommended_pattern": "serverless_web",
  "service_stack": ["S3", "CloudFront", "API Gateway", "Lambda", "DynamoDB", "Cognito"],
  "estimated_monthly_cost_usd": 35,
  "pros": ["Low ops overhead", "Pay-per-use", "Auto-scaling"],
  "cons": ["Cold starts", "15-min Lambda limit", "Eventual consistency"]
}

Select from recommended patterns:

  • Serverless Web: S3 + CloudFront + API Gateway + Lambda + DynamoDB
  • Event-Driven Microservices: EventBridge + Lambda + SQS + Step Functions
  • Three-Tier: ALB + ECS Fargate + Aurora + ElastiCache
  • GraphQL Backend: AppSync + Lambda + DynamoDB + Cognito

See references/architecture_patterns.md for detailed pattern specifications.

Validation checkpoint: Confirm the recommended pattern matches the team's operational maturity and compliance requirements before proceeding to Step 3.

Step 3: Generate IaC Templates

Create infrastructure-as-code for the selected pattern:

# Serverless stack (CloudFormation)
python scripts/serverless_stack.py --app-name my-app --region us-east-1

Example CloudFormation YAML output (core serverless resources):

AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Transform: AWS::Serverless-2016-10-31

Parameters:
  AppName:
    Type: String
    Default: my-app

Resources:
  ApiFunction:
    Type: AWS::Serverless::Function
    Properties:
      Handler: index.handler
      Runtime: nodejs20.x
      MemorySize: 512
      Timeout: 30
      Environment:
        Variables:
          TABLE_NAME: !Ref DataTable
      Policies:
        - DynamoDBCrudPolicy:
            TableName: !Ref DataTable
      Events:
        ApiEvent:
          Type: Api
          Properties:
            Path: /{proxy+}
            Method: ANY

  DataTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      BillingMode: PAY_PER_REQUEST
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: pk
          AttributeType: S
        - AttributeName: sk
          AttributeType: S
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: pk
          KeyType: HASH
        - AttributeName: sk
          KeyType: RANGE

Full templates including API Gateway, Cognito, IAM roles, and CloudWatch logging are generated by serverless_stack.py and also available in references/architecture_patterns.md.

Example CDK TypeScript snippet (three-tier pattern):

import * as ecs from 'aws-cdk-lib/aws-ecs';
import * as ec2 from 'aws-cdk-lib/aws-ec2';
import * as rds from 'aws-cdk-lib/aws-rds';

const vpc = new ec2.Vpc(this, 'AppVpc', { maxAzs: 2 });

const cluster = new ecs.Cluster(this, 'AppCluster', { vpc });

const db = new rds.ServerlessCluster(this, 'AppDb', {
  engine: rds.DatabaseClusterEngine.auroraPostgres({
    version: rds.AuroraPostgresEngineVersion.VER_15_2,
  }),
  vpc,
  scaling: { minCapacity: 0.5, maxCapacity: 4 },
});

Step 4: Review Costs

Analyze estimated costs and optimization opportunities:

python scripts/cost_optimizer.py --resources current_setup.json --monthly-spend 2000

Example output:

{
  "current_monthly_usd": 2000,
  "recommendations": [
    { "action": "Right-size RDS db.r5.2xlarge → db.r5.large", "savings_usd": 420, "priority": "high" },
    { "action": "Purchase 1-yr Compute Savings Plan at 40% utilization", "savings_usd": 310, "priority": "high" },
    { "action": "Move S3 objects >90 days to Glacier Instant Retrieval", "savings_usd": 85, "priority": "medium" }
  ],
  "total_potential_savings_usd": 815
}

Output includes:

  • Monthly cost breakdown by service
  • Right-sizing recommendations
  • Savings Plans opportunities
  • Potential monthly savings

Step 5: Deploy

Deploy the generated infrastructure:

# CloudFormation
aws cloudformation create-stack \
  --stack-name my-app-stack \
  --template-body file://template.yaml \
  --capabilities CAPABILITY_IAM

# CDK
cdk deploy

# Terraform
terraform init && terraform apply

Step 6: Validate and Handle Failures

Verify deployment and set up monitoring:

# Check stack status
aws cloudformation describe-stacks --stack-name my-app-stack

# Set up CloudWatch alarms
aws cloudwatch put-metric-alarm --alarm-name high-errors ...

If stack creation fails:

  1. Check the failure reason:
    aws cloudformation describe-stack-events \
      --stack-name my-app-stack \
      --query 'StackEvents[?ResourceStatus==`CREATE_FAILED`]'
    
  2. Review CloudWatch Logs for Lambda or ECS errors.
  3. Fix the template or resource configuration.
  4. Delete the failed stack before retrying:
    aws cloudformation delete-stack --stack-name my-app-stack
    # Wait for deletion
    aws cloudformation wait stack-delete-complete --stack-name my-app-stack
    # Redeploy
    aws cloudformation create-stack ...
    

Common failure causes:

  • IAM permission errors → verify --capabilities CAPABILITY_IAM and role trust policies
  • Resource limit exceeded → request quota increase via Service Quotas console
  • Invalid template syntax → run aws cloudformation validate-template --template-body file://template.yaml before deploying

Tools

architecture_designer.py

Generates architecture patterns based on requirements.

python scripts/architecture_designer.py --input requirements.json --output design.json

Input: JSON with app type, scale, budget, compliance needs Output: Recommended pattern, service stack, cost estimate, pros/cons

serverless_stack.py

Creates serverless CloudFormation templates.

python scripts/serverless_stack.py --app-name my-app --region us-east-1

Output: Production-ready CloudFormation YAML with:

  • API Gateway + Lambda
  • DynamoDB table
  • Cognito user pool
  • IAM roles with least privilege
  • CloudWatch logging

cost_optimizer.py

Analyzes costs and recommends optimizations.

python scripts/cost_optimizer.py --resources inventory.json --monthly-spend 5000

Output: Recommendations for:

  • Idle resource removal
  • Instance right-sizing
  • Reserved capacity purchases
  • Storage tier transitions
  • NAT Gateway alternatives

Quick Start

MVP Architecture (< $100/month)

Ask: "Design a serverless MVP backend for a mobile app with 1000 users"

Result:
- Lambda + API Gateway for API
- DynamoDB pay-per-request for data
- Cognito for authentication
- S3 + CloudFront for static assets
- Estimated: $20-50/month

Scaling Architecture ($500-2000/month)

Ask: "Design a scalable architecture for a SaaS platform with 50k users"

Result:
- ECS Fargate for containerized API
- Aurora Serverless for relational data
- ElastiCache for session caching
- CloudFront for CDN
- CodePipeline for CI/CD
- Multi-AZ deployment

Cost Optimization

Ask: "Optimize my AWS setup to reduce costs by 30%. Current spend: $3000/month"

Provide: Current resource inventory (EC2, RDS, S3, etc.)

Result:
- Idle resource identification
- Right-sizing recommendations
- Savings Plans analysis
- Storage lifecycle policies
- Target savings: $900/month

IaC Generation

Ask: "Generate CloudFormation for a three-tier web app with auto-scaling"

Result:
- VPC with public/private subnets
- ALB with HTTPS
- ECS Fargate with auto-scaling
- Aurora with read replicas
- Security groups and IAM roles

Input Requirements

Provide these details for architecture design:

RequirementDescriptionExample
Application typeWhat you're buildingSaaS platform, mobile backend
Expected scaleUsers, requests/sec10k users, 100 RPS
BudgetMonthly AWS limit$500/month max
Team contextSize, AWS experience3 devs, intermediate
ComplianceRegulatory needsHIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2
AvailabilityUptime requirements99.9% SLA, 1hr RPO

JSON Format:

{
  "application_type": "saas_platform",
  "expected_users": 10000,
  "requests_per_second": 100,
  "budget_monthly_usd": 500,
  "team_size": 3,
  "aws_experience": "intermediate",
  "compliance": ["SOC2"],
  "availability_sla": "99.9%"
}

Output Formats

Architecture Design

  • Pattern recommendation with rationale
  • Service stack diagram (ASCII)
  • Monthly cost estimate and trade-offs

IaC Templates

  • CloudFormation YAML: Production-ready SAM/CFN templates
  • CDK TypeScript: Type-safe infrastructure code
  • Terraform HCL: Multi-cloud compatible configs

Cost Analysis

  • Current spend breakdown with optimization recommendations
  • Priority action list (high/medium/low) and implementation checklist

Reference Documentation

DocumentContents
references/architecture_patterns.md6 patterns: serverless, microservices, three-tier, data processing, GraphQL, multi-region
references/service_selection.mdDecision matrices for compute, database, storage, messaging
references/best_practices.mdServerless design, cost optimization, security hardening, scalability

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する