本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

board-prep

Board meeting preparation for the adversarial scenario, not the friendly one. Forces numbers-cold mastery, anticipates hard questions, builds a narrative that acknowledges weakness without losing the room. Use when preparing for a board meeting, an investor update, fundraising presentation, or any high-stakes adversarial review where every number must live in your head not just on a slide.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

/em:board-prep — Board Meeting Preparation

Command: /em:board-prep <agenda>

Prepare for the adversarial version of your board, not the friendly one. Every hard question they'll ask. Every number you need cold. The narrative that acknowledges weakness without losing the room.


The Reality of Board Meetings

Your board members have seen 50+ companies. They've watched founders flinch at their own numbers, spin bad news as "learning opportunities," and present sanitized decks that hide what's actually happening.

They know when you're not being straight with them. The question isn't whether they'll ask the hard questions — it's whether you're ready for them.

The best board meetings aren't the ones where everything looks good. They're the ones where the CEO demonstrates they see reality clearly, have a plan, and can execute under pressure.


The Preparation Framework

Phase 1: Numbers Cold

Before the meeting, every number in your deck should live in your head, not just the slide.

The numbers you must know without looking:

  • Current MRR / ARR and month-over-month growth rate
  • Burn rate (monthly) and runway (months at current burn)
  • Headcount by department
  • CAC and LTV by channel / segment
  • Net Revenue Retention
  • Pipeline: value, conversion rate, average sales cycle
  • Churn: rate, top reasons, top churned accounts
  • Gross margin (product), net margin (company)
  • Key hiring positions open and time-to-fill

Stress test yourself: Can you answer "what's your burn?" without hesitation? "What's your churn rate by segment?" If you pause, you don't know it.

Phase 2: Anticipate the Hard Questions

For every item on the agenda, generate the adversarial version of the question.

Standard adversarial questions by topic:

Revenue performance:

  • "You missed revenue by 20% this quarter. What specifically failed?"
  • "Is this a pipeline problem, a conversion problem, or a capacity problem?"
  • "If you missed because of one big deal, how dependent is your model on individual deals?"
  • "When do you project recovery and what are the leading indicators you're right?"

Runway / burn:

  • "At current burn you have N months. What's your plan if the next round takes 9 months?"
  • "What would you cut first if you had to extend runway by 6 months today?"
  • "Is there a scenario where you don't raise another round?"

Product / roadmap:

  • "You shipped X. What did customers actually do with it?"
  • "What did you kill this quarter and why?"
  • "Where are you behind on roadmap? What's slipping?"

Team:

  • "Who's at risk of leaving? How would that affect execution?"
  • "You've had 3 VP-level hires not work out. What pattern do you see?"
  • "Is the team the right team for this stage?"

Competition:

  • "Competitor Y just raised $50M. How does that change your position?"
  • "If they copy your best feature in 90 days, what's your moat?"

Phase 3: Build the Narrative

The board meeting isn't a status update. It's a leadership demonstration.

The structure that works:

  1. Where we are (honest) — Current state of business, the real number, not the smoothed one
  2. What we learned — What the data is telling us that we didn't know 90 days ago
  3. What we got wrong — Name it directly. Don't make them ask.
  4. What we're doing about it — Specific, dated, owned actions
  5. What we need from this room — Concrete ask. Not "support" — specific introductions, decisions, resources.

The rule on bad news: Never let the board be surprised. If a quarter went badly, they should know before the deck. A 5-sentence email 3 days before: "Revenue came in at $X vs $Y target. Here's what happened, here's what I'm doing, here's what I need from you."

Phase 4: Adversarial Preparation

Do a mock board meeting. Have someone play the hardest director you have.

The simulation:

  • Present your deck as you would
  • The mock director asks every uncomfortable question
  • You answer without referring to the deck
  • After: note every question that made you pause or feel defensive

The questions that made you defensive = the questions you need to prepare for.

Phase 5: Director-by-Director Prep

Not all board members want the same thing from a meeting.

For each director, know:

  • Their primary concern right now (usually tied to their investment thesis)
  • The metric they watch most closely
  • What would make them lose confidence in you
  • What they've said in the last meeting that you should address

Common director types:

  • The operator — wants to know what's breaking and who owns fixing it
  • The financial investor — focused on path to profitability or next raise
  • The strategic investor — worried about competitive position and moat
  • The independent — watching governance, team dynamics, and your judgment

Pre-Meeting Checklist

48 hours before:

  • All numbers verified against source systems (not last week's export)
  • Deck reviewed for internal consistency
  • Pre-read sent to board (deck + 1-page brief on key topics)
  • One-on-ones done with any director likely to have concerns
  • 3 hardest questions you expect — rehearsed out loud

Day of meeting:

  • Agenda with time allocations distributed
  • Know the ask for each agenda item (decision needed, input wanted, FYI)
  • Materials to leave behind prepared
  • Follow-up action template ready

During the Meeting

What the board is watching:

  • Do you own the bad news or deflect it?
  • Are you defending a narrative or sharing reality?
  • Do you know your numbers or do you look things up?
  • When challenged, do you get defensive or engage?
  • Do you know what you don't know?

The single best thing you can do: Name the hard thing before they do. "I want to address the revenue miss directly. Here's what happened, here's what I should have caught earlier, here's what changes."


After the Meeting

Within 24 hours:

  • Send action items with owners and dates
  • Send any data you promised but didn't have
  • Note the questions that came up you weren't ready for
  • Schedule follow-up with any director who seemed unsatisfied

The next board prep starts now.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する