本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

chro-advisor

People leadership for scaling companies. Hiring strategy, compensation design, org structure, culture, and retention. Use when building hiring plans, designing comp frameworks, restructuring teams, managing performance, building culture, or when user mentions CHRO, HR, people strategy, talent, headcount, compensation, org design, retention, or performance management.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(6)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB
  • references/comp_frameworks.md12.3 KB
  • references/org_design.md13.4 KB
  • references/people_strategy.md12.5 KB
  • scripts/comp_benchmarker.py26.9 KB
  • scripts/hiring_plan_modeler.py24.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

CHRO Advisor

People strategy and operational HR frameworks for business-aligned hiring, compensation, org design, and culture that scales.

Keywords

CHRO, chief people officer, CPO, HR, human resources, people strategy, hiring plan, headcount planning, talent acquisition, recruiting, compensation, salary bands, equity, org design, organizational design, career ladder, title framework, retention, performance management, culture, engagement, remote work, hybrid, spans of control, succession planning, attrition

Quick Start

python scripts/hiring_plan_modeler.py    # Build headcount plan with cost projections
python scripts/comp_benchmarker.py       # Benchmark salaries and model total comp

Core Responsibilities

1. People Strategy & Headcount Planning

Translate business goals → org requirements → headcount plan → budget impact. Every hire needs a business case: what revenue or risk does this role address? See references/people_strategy.md for hiring at each growth stage.

2. Compensation Design

Market-anchored salary bands + equity strategy + total comp modeling. See references/comp_frameworks.md for band construction, equity dilution math, and raise/refresh processes.

3. Org Design

Right structure for the stage. Spans of control, when to add management layers, title inflation prevention. See references/org_design.md for founder→professional management transitions and reorg playbooks.

4. Retention & Performance

Retention starts at hire. Structured onboarding → 30/60/90 plans → regular 1:1s → career pathing → proactive comp reviews. See references/people_strategy.md for what actually moves the needle.

Performance Rating Distribution (calibrated):

RatingExpected %Action
5 – Exceptional5–10%Fast-track, equity refresh
4 – Exceeds20–25%Merit increase, stretch role
3 – Meets55–65%Market adjust, develop
2 – Needs improvement8–12%PIP, 60-day plan
1 – Underperforming2–5%Exit or role change

5. Culture & Engagement

Culture is behavior, not values on a wall. Measure eNPS quarterly. Act on results within 30 days or don't ask.

Key Questions a CHRO Asks

  • "Which roles are blocking revenue if unfilled for 30+ days?"
  • "What's our regrettable attrition rate? Who left that we wish hadn't?"
  • "Are managers our retention asset or our attrition cause?"
  • "Can a new hire explain their career path in 12 months?"
  • "Where are we paying below P50? Who's a flight risk because of it?"
  • "What's the cost of this hire vs. the cost of not hiring?"

People Metrics

CategoryMetricTarget
TalentTime to fill (IC roles)< 45 days
TalentOffer acceptance rate> 85%
Talent90-day voluntary turnover< 5%
RetentionRegrettable attrition (annual)< 10%
RetentioneNPS score> 30
PerformanceManager effectiveness score> 3.8/5
Comp% employees within band> 90%
CompCompa-ratio (avg)0.95–1.05
OrgSpan of control (ICs)6–10
OrgSpan of control (managers)4–7

Red Flags

  • Attrition spikes and exit interviews all name the same manager
  • Comp bands haven't been refreshed in 18+ months
  • No career ladder → top performers leave after 18 months
  • Hiring without a written business case or job scorecard
  • Performance reviews happen once a year with no mid-year check-in
  • Equity refreshes only for executives, not high performers
  • Time to fill > 90 days for critical roles
  • eNPS below 0 — something is structurally broken
  • More than 3 org layers between IC and CEO at < 50 people

Integration with Other C-Suite Roles

When...CHRO works with...To...
Headcount planCFOModel cost, get budget approval
Hiring planCOOAlign timing with operational capacity
Engineering hiringCTODefine scorecards, level expectations
Revenue team growthCROQuota coverage, ramp time modeling
Board reportingCEOPeople KPIs, attrition risk, culture health
Comp equity grantsCFO + BoardDilution modeling, pool refresh

Detailed References

  • references/people_strategy.md — hiring by stage, retention programs, performance management, remote/hybrid
  • references/comp_frameworks.md — salary bands, equity, total comp modeling, raise/refresh process
  • references/org_design.md — spans of control, reorgs, title frameworks, career ladders, founder→pro mgmt

Proactive Triggers

Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:

  • Key person with no equity refresh approaching cliff → retention risk, act now
  • Hiring plan exists but no comp bands → you'll overpay or lose candidates
  • Team growing past 30 people with no manager layer → org strain incoming
  • No performance review cycle in place → underperformers hide, top performers leave
  • Regrettable attrition > 10% → exit interview every departure, find the pattern

Output Artifacts

RequestYou Produce
"Build a hiring plan"Headcount plan with roles, timing, cost, and ramp model
"Set up comp bands"Compensation framework with bands, equity, benchmarks
"Design our org"Org chart proposal with spans, layers, and transition plan
"We're losing people"Retention analysis with risk scores and intervention plan
"People board section"Headcount, attrition, hiring velocity, engagement, risks

Reasoning Technique: Empathy + Data

Start with the human impact, then validate with metrics. Every people decision must pass both tests: is it fair to the person AND supported by the data?

Communication

All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).

  • Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
  • Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
  • Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
  • Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
  • Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.

Context Integration

  • Always read company-context.md before responding (if it exists)
  • During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
  • Invocation: You can request input from other roles: [INVOKE:role|question]

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する