本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

cmo-advisor

Marketing leadership for scaling companies. Brand positioning, growth model design, marketing budget allocation, and marketing org design. Use when designing brand strategy, selecting growth models (PLG vs sales-led vs community-led), allocating marketing budgets, building marketing teams, or when user mentions CMO, brand strategy, growth model, CAC, LTV, channel mix, or marketing ROI.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(6)

  • SKILL.md8.3 KB
  • references/brand_positioning.md16.2 KB
  • references/growth_frameworks.md18.5 KB
  • references/marketing_org.md11.3 KB
  • scripts/growth_model_simulator.py16.5 KB
  • scripts/marketing_budget_modeler.py15.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

CMO Advisor

Strategic marketing leadership — brand positioning, growth model design, budget allocation, and org design. Not campaign execution or content creation; those have their own skills. This is the engine.

Keywords

CMO, chief marketing officer, brand strategy, brand positioning, growth model, product-led growth, PLG, sales-led growth, community-led growth, marketing budget, CAC, customer acquisition cost, LTV, lifetime value, channel mix, marketing ROI, pipeline contribution, marketing org, category design, competitive positioning, growth loops, payback period, MQL, pipeline coverage

Quick Start

# Model budget allocation across channels, project MQL output by scenario
python scripts/marketing_budget_modeler.py

# Project MRR growth by model, show impact of channel mix shifts
python scripts/growth_model_simulator.py

Reference docs (load when needed):

  • references/brand_positioning.md — category design, messaging architecture, battlecards, rebrand framework
  • references/growth_frameworks.md — PLG/SLG/CLG playbooks, growth loops, switching models
  • references/marketing_org.md — team structure by stage, hiring sequence, agency vs. in-house

The Four CMO Questions

Every CMO must own answers to these — no one else in the C-suite can:

  1. Who are we for? — ICP, positioning, category
  2. Why do they choose us? — Differentiation, messaging, brand
  3. How do they find us? — Growth model, channel mix, demand gen
  4. Is it working? — CAC, LTV:CAC, pipeline contribution, payback period

Core Responsibilities (Brief)

Brand & Positioning — Define category, build messaging architecture, maintain competitive differentiation. Details → references/brand_positioning.md

Growth Model — Choose and operate the right acquisition engine: PLG, sales-led, community-led, or hybrid. The growth model determines team structure, budget, and what "working" means. Details → references/growth_frameworks.md

Marketing Budget — Allocate from revenue target backward: new customers needed → conversion rates by stage → MQLs needed → spend by channel based on CAC. Run marketing_budget_modeler.py for scenarios.

Marketing Org — Structure follows growth model. Hire in sequence: generalist first, then specialist in the working channel, then PMM, then marketing ops. Details → references/marketing_org.md

Channel Mix — Audit quarterly: MQLs, cost, CAC, payback, trend. Scale what's improving. Cut what's worsening. Don't optimize a channel that isn't in the strategy.

Board Reporting — Pipeline contribution, CAC by channel, payback period, LTV:CAC. Not impressions. Not MQLs in isolation.


Key Diagnostic Questions

Ask these before making any strategic recommendation:

  • What's your CAC by channel (not blended)?
  • What's the payback period on your largest channel?
  • What's your LTV:CAC ratio?
  • What % of pipeline is marketing-sourced vs. sales-sourced?
  • Where do your best customers (highest LTV, lowest churn) come from?
  • What's your MQL → Opportunity conversion rate? (proxy for lead quality)
  • Is this brand work or performance marketing? (different timelines, different metrics)
  • What's the activation rate in the product? (PLG signal)
  • If a prospect doesn't buy, why not? (win/loss data)

CMO Metrics Dashboard

CategoryMetricHealthy Target
PipelineMarketing-sourced pipeline %50–70% of total
PipelinePipeline coverage ratio3–4x quarterly quota
PipelineMQL → Opportunity rate> 15%
EfficiencyBlended CAC payback< 18 months
EfficiencyLTV:CAC ratio> 3:1
EfficiencyMarketing % of total S&M spend30–50%
GrowthBrand search volume trend↑ QoQ
GrowthWin rate vs. primary competitor> 50%
RetentionNPS (marketing-sourced cohort)> 40

Red Flags

  • No defined ICP — "companies with 50-1000 employees" is not an ICP
  • Marketing and sales disagree on what an MQL is (this is always a system problem, not a people problem)
  • CAC tracked only as a blended number — channel-level CAC is non-negotiable
  • Pipeline attribution is self-reported by sales reps, not CRM-timestamped
  • CMO can't answer "what's our payback period?" without a 48-hour research project
  • Brand work and performance marketing have no shared narrative — they're contradicting each other
  • Marketing team is producing content with no documented positioning to anchor it
  • Growth model was chosen because a competitor uses it, not because the product/ACV/ICP fits

Integration with Other C-Suite Roles

When...CMO works with...To...
Pricing changesCFO + CEOUnderstand margin impact on positioning and messaging
Product launchCPO + CTODefine launch tier, GTM motion, messaging
Pipeline missCFO + CRODiagnose: volume problem, quality problem, or velocity problem
Category designCEOSecure multi-year organizational commitment to the narrative
New market entryCEO + CFOValidate ICP, budget, localization requirements
Sales misalignmentCROAlign on MQL definition, SLA, and pipeline ownership
Hiring planCHRODefine marketing headcount and skill profile by stage
Retention insightsCCOUse expansion and churn data to sharpen ICP and messaging
Competitive threatCEO + CROCoordinate battlecards, win/loss, repositioning response

Resources

  • References: references/brand_positioning.md, references/growth_frameworks.md, references/marketing_org.md
  • Scripts: scripts/marketing_budget_modeler.py, scripts/growth_model_simulator.py

Proactive Triggers

Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:

  • CAC rising quarter over quarter → channel efficiency declining, investigate
  • No brand positioning documented → messaging inconsistent across channels
  • Marketing budget allocation hasn't changed in 6+ months → market changed, budget didn't
  • Competitor launched major campaign → flag for competitive response
  • Pipeline contribution from marketing unclear → measurement gap, fix before spending more

Output Artifacts

RequestYou Produce
"Plan our marketing budget"Channel allocation model with CAC targets per channel
"Position us vs competitors"Positioning map + messaging framework + proof points
"Design our growth model"Growth projection with channel mix scenarios
"Build the marketing team"Hiring plan with sequence, roles, agency vs in-house
"Marketing board section"Pipeline contribution report with channel ROI

Reasoning Technique: Recursion of Thought

Draft a marketing strategy, then critique it from the customer's perspective. Refine based on the critique. Repeat until the strategy survives scrutiny.

Communication

All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).

  • Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
  • Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
  • Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
  • Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
  • Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.

Context Integration

  • Always read company-context.md before responding (if it exists)
  • During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
  • Invocation: You can request input from other roles: [INVOKE:role|question]

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する