本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

generate

Generate Playwright tests. Use when user says "write tests", "generate tests", "add tests for", "test this component", "e2e test", "create test for", "test this page", or "test this feature".

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB
  • patterns.md5.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Generate Playwright Tests

Generate production-ready Playwright tests from a user story, URL, component name, or feature description.

Input

$ARGUMENTS contains what to test. Examples:

  • "user can log in with email and password"
  • "the checkout flow"
  • "src/components/UserProfile.tsx"
  • "the search page with filters"

Steps

1. Understand the Target

Parse $ARGUMENTS to determine:

  • User story: Extract the behavior to verify
  • Component path: Read the component source code
  • Page/URL: Identify the route and its elements
  • Feature name: Map to relevant app areas

2. Explore the Codebase

Use the Explore subagent to gather context:

  • Read playwright.config.ts for testDir, baseURL, projects
  • Check existing tests in testDir for patterns, fixtures, and conventions
  • If a component path is given, read the component to understand its props, states, and interactions
  • Check for existing page objects in pages/
  • Check for existing fixtures in fixtures/
  • Check for auth setup (auth.setup.ts or storageState config)

3. Select Templates

Check templates/ in this plugin for matching patterns:

If testing...Load template from
Login/auth flow../pw/templates/auth/login.md
CRUD operationstemplates/crud/
Checkout/paymenttemplates/checkout/
Search/filter UItemplates/search/
Form submissiontemplates/forms/
Dashboard/datatemplates/dashboard/
Settings pagetemplates/settings/
Onboarding flowtemplates/onboarding/
API endpointstemplates/api/
Accessibilitytemplates/accessibility/

Adapt the template to the specific app — replace {{placeholders}} with actual selectors, URLs, and data.

4. Generate the Test

Follow these rules:

Structure:

import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
// Import custom fixtures if the project uses them

test.describe('Feature Name', () => {
  // Group related behaviors

  test('should <expected behavior>', async ({ page }) => {
    // Arrange: navigate, set up state
    // Act: perform user action
    // Assert: verify outcome
  });
});

Locator priority (use the first that works):

  1. getByRole() — buttons, links, headings, form elements
  2. getByLabel() — form fields with labels
  3. getByText() — non-interactive text content
  4. getByPlaceholder() — inputs with placeholder text
  5. getByTestId() — when semantic options aren't available

Assertions — always web-first:

// GOOD — auto-retries
await expect(page.getByRole('heading')).toBeVisible();
await expect(page.getByRole('alert')).toHaveText('Success');

// BAD — no retry
const text = await page.textContent('.msg');
expect(text).toBe('Success');

Never use:

  • page.waitForTimeout()
  • page.$(selector) or page.$$(selector)
  • Bare CSS selectors unless absolutely necessary
  • page.evaluate() for things locators can do

Always include:

  • Descriptive test names that explain the behavior
  • Error/edge case tests alongside happy path
  • Proper await on every Playwright call
  • baseURL-relative navigation (page.goto('/') not page.goto('http://...'))

5. Match Project Conventions

  • If project uses TypeScript → generate .spec.ts
  • If project uses JavaScript → generate .spec.js with require() imports
  • If project has page objects → use them instead of inline locators
  • If project has custom fixtures → import and use them
  • If project has a test data directory → create test data files there

6. Generate Supporting Files (If Needed)

  • Page object: If the test touches 5+ unique locators on one page, create a page object
  • Fixture: If the test needs shared setup (auth, data), create or extend a fixture
  • Test data: If the test uses structured data, create a JSON file in test-data/

7. Verify

Run the generated test:

npx playwright test <generated-file> --reporter=list

If it fails:

  1. Read the error
  2. Fix the test (not the app)
  3. Run again
  4. If it's an app issue, report it to the user

Output

  • Generated test file(s) with path
  • Any supporting files created (page objects, fixtures, data)
  • Test run result
  • Coverage note: what behaviors are now tested

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

aeo

無料

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

Mint a tamper-evident, post-quantum-signed receipt for a consequential agent action (deploy, delete, pay, grant-access, model decision) so it can be verified later from the certificate alone. Use when an autonomous agent takes a side-effecting action that may need to be proven later, or when satisfying EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping. Three decisions: whether an action needs a receipt, minting it, verifying it. Signing is delegated to the open-source OpenAgentOntology package. Not after-the-fact log analysis; not a hosted notary; not a legal opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-skills2.8万2026年8月30日 更新

alirezarezvani のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する