本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

incident-response

Run an incident response workflow — triage, communicate, and write postmortem. Trigger with "we have an incident", "production is down", an alert that needs severity assessment, a status update mid-incident, or when writing a blameless postmortem after resolution.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

/incident-response

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Manage an incident from detection through postmortem.

Usage

/incident-response $ARGUMENTS

Modes

/incident-response new [description]     # Start a new incident
/incident-response update [status]       # Post a status update
/incident-response postmortem            # Generate postmortem from incident data

If no mode is specified, ask what phase the incident is in.

How It Works

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    INCIDENT RESPONSE                               │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Phase 1: TRIAGE                                                  │
│  ✓ Assess severity (SEV1-4)                                     │
│  ✓ Identify affected systems and users                          │
│  ✓ Assign roles (IC, comms, responders)                         │
│                                                                    │
│  Phase 2: COMMUNICATE                                              │
│  ✓ Draft internal status update                                  │
│  ✓ Draft customer communication (if needed)                     │
│  ✓ Set up war room and cadence                                   │
│                                                                    │
│  Phase 3: MITIGATE                                                 │
│  ✓ Document mitigation steps taken                               │
│  ✓ Track timeline of events                                      │
│  ✓ Confirm resolution                                            │
│                                                                    │
│  Phase 4: POSTMORTEM                                               │
│  ✓ Blameless postmortem document                                 │
│  ✓ Timeline reconstruction                                       │
│  ✓ Root cause analysis (5 whys)                                  │
│  ✓ Action items with owners                                      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Severity Classification

LevelCriteriaResponse Time
SEV1Service down, all users affectedImmediate, all-hands
SEV2Major feature degraded, many users affectedWithin 15 min
SEV3Minor feature issue, some users affectedWithin 1 hour
SEV4Cosmetic or low-impact issueNext business day

Communication Guidance

Provide clear, factual updates at regular cadence. Include: what's happening, who's affected, what we're doing, when the next update is.

Output — Status Update

## Incident Update: [Title]
**Severity:** SEV[1-4] | **Status:** Investigating | Identified | Monitoring | Resolved
**Impact:** [Who/what is affected]
**Last Updated:** [Timestamp]

### Current Status
[What we know now]

### Actions Taken
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]

### Next Steps
- [What's happening next and ETA]

### Timeline
| Time | Event |
|------|-------|
| [HH:MM] | [Event] |

Output — Postmortem

## Postmortem: [Incident Title]
**Date:** [Date] | **Duration:** [X hours] | **Severity:** SEV[X]
**Authors:** [Names] | **Status:** Draft

### Summary
[2-3 sentence plain-language summary]

### Impact
- [Users affected]
- [Duration of impact]
- [Business impact if quantifiable]

### Timeline
| Time (UTC) | Event |
|------------|-------|
| [HH:MM] | [Event] |

### Root Cause
[Detailed explanation of what caused the incident]

### 5 Whys
1. Why did [symptom]? → [Because...]
2. Why did [cause 1]? → [Because...]
3. Why did [cause 2]? → [Because...]
4. Why did [cause 3]? → [Because...]
5. Why did [cause 4]? → [Root cause]

### What Went Well
- [Things that worked]

### What Went Poorly
- [Things that didn't work]

### Action Items
| Action | Owner | Priority | Due Date |
|--------|-------|----------|----------|
| [Action] | [Person] | P0/P1/P2 | [Date] |

### Lessons Learned
[Key takeaways for the team]

If Connectors Available

If ~~monitoring is connected:

  • Pull alert details and metrics
  • Show graphs of affected metrics

If ~~incident management is connected:

  • Create or update incident in PagerDuty/Opsgenie
  • Page on-call responders

If ~~chat is connected:

  • Post status updates to incident channel
  • Create war room channel

Tips

  1. Start writing immediately — Don't wait for complete information. Update as you learn more.
  2. Keep updates factual — What we know, what we've done, what's next. No speculation.
  3. Postmortems are blameless — Focus on systems and processes, not individuals.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Run a WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility audit on a design or page. Trigger with "audit accessibility", "check a11y", "is this accessible?", or when reviewing a design for color contrast, keyboard navigation, touch target size, or screen reader behavior before handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins2.9万2026年10月10日 更新

360-degree view of an account - CRM data, recent email threads, docs, transcripts, and internal chat chatter, synthesized into one brief. Use when the user asks "tell me about [account]" (an existing customer; for a prospect, account-research), "account context for [name]", "what's going on with [account]", or "catch me up on [account]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins2.9万2026年10月10日 更新

Build or refresh a strategic account plan - current state, goals, stakeholder coverage, opportunity map, risks, and the action plan - written to a doc and key fields synced to the CRM. Use when the user says "build an account plan for [account]", "update the [account] plan", "account planning for [account]", or before a planning cycle / QBR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins2.9万2026年10月10日 更新

Research a company using Common Room data. Triggers on 'research [company]', 'tell me about [domain]', 'pull up signals for [account]', 'what's going on with [company]', or any account-level question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins2.9万2026年10月10日 更新

Research a target company and optionally a specific contact - company overview, recent news, likely priorities, and fit against your ICP. Cross-references existing CRM records. Use when the user asks to "research [company]", "look into [company]", "prospect research on [company]", "look up [person]", "intel on [prospect]", "who is [person] at [company]", or "tell me about [company]" when the company is a prospect rather than an existing account.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins2.9万2026年10月10日 更新

Score and tier a list of accounts (or your full book) against ICP fit and engagement signals to prioritize where to spend time. Use when the user asks to "tier my accounts", "prioritize my book", "which accounts should I focus on", or "score these accounts".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins2.9万2026年10月10日 更新

anthropics のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する