本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

using-loopkit

Use when starting any conversation in a loopkit-enabled project - establishes how to find and use loopkit's 49 skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Using Loopkit

<EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT> If you think there is even a 1% chance a loopkit skill applies to what you are doing, INVOKE it.

IF A SKILL APPLIES, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.

This overrides "just answer quickly" instincts. Not negotiable. </EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>

The Rule

Invoke relevant skills BEFORE any response or action — including clarifying questions, exploring the codebase, or reading files. If it turns out wrong for the situation, drop it.

Then announce "Using [skill] to [purpose]" and follow the skill exactly. If it has a checklist, create a todo per item.

Where the skills live

Skills are files at .claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.md. Each has YAML frontmatter with name and description (the description is a trigger phrase, not a summary). Load a skill by reading its SKILL.md when its trigger matches your task.

Skill routing (49 skills, 10 tracks)

Task shapeFirst skill
"Fix this bug" / test failing / crashsystematic-debugging, then read-the-trace
"It broke between two commits"bisect-regression
"Flaky test"flaky-hunter
"Add a feature" / write anything newspec-first, then write-failing-test-first
"Refactor" / dead code / deep nestingkill-dead-code, simplify, reduce-nesting
About to claim done / commit / open PRadversarial-verify + verification-before-completion + self-eval-bias
Review a diffadversarial-verify, pr-from-diff
Frontend / UI workdesign-system, a11y-pass, loading-empty-error-states
Security touchowasp-review, authz-check, input-validation, secret-scan, dependency-audit
Data / SQL / migrationssql-review, migration-writer, schema-diff
Docs / changelog / READMEchangelog-from-diff, decision-record, readme-audit
Git opsclean-commits, pr-from-diff, rebase-safely, revert-surgical
Test suite gapscoverage-gaps, contract-test
Running out of contextcontext-budget, tool-restraint
Parallel worksubagent-fanout
Starting a fresh project / major featureplanner-spec-expand, then feature-list-json, then init-script-contract
Bootstrapping into an existing multi-session projectprogress-reading-protocol
Entering an implementation sprintsprint-contract
Calibrating a reviewer / evaluatorevaluator-calibration
New Claude/Sonnet/Opus model landedharness-stripping

Full list: ls .claude/skills/.

Red Flags — STOP and check for a skill

ThoughtReality
"This is just a simple question"Questions are tasks. Check first.
"Let me explore the codebase first"Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first.
"I remember this skill"Skills evolve. Read the current SKILL.md.
"The skill is overkill"Simple things become complex. Use it.
"I'll just do this one thing first"Check BEFORE doing anything.
"Tests pass, we're good"verification-before-completion says: run the exact command, read the output, then claim.
"I'll do both features while I'm in here"single-feature-discipline says: one per session. Never two.
"The reviewer will let this slide"self-eval-bias says: assume it will confidently praise. Calibrate first.

Priority when multiple skills apply

Process skills first (spec-first, systematic-debugging, planner-spec-expand, sprint-contract), then implementation skills (design-system, sql-review, etc.), then finishers (adversarial-verify, verification-before-completion, self-eval-bias, clean-commits).

  • "Let's build X" → planner-spec-expand → feature-list-json → sprint-contract → domain skills → adversarial-verify.
  • "Fix bug Y" → systematic-debugging → read-the-trace → fix → verification-before-completion.
  • "Session open in existing project" → progress-reading-protocol → sprint-contract → work.

Skill release convention

Every new skill in loopkit ships as a folder with four required files. No exceptions — a skill without these is a draft, not a release.

skills/<skill-name>/
  SKILL.md            # the skill itself (frontmatter + procedure)
  POST.md             # ~200-word X-thread-shaped explainer
  evidence/
    before.md         # verbatim transcript WITHOUT the skill loaded
    after.md          # same prompt WITH the skill loaded
  • SKILL.md — routed on its frontmatter description. Body under ~150 lines.
  • POST.md — the announcement thread. Copy from template/POST.md, fill in every placeholder before publishing.
  • evidence/before.md + evidence/after.md — one real task, both transcripts. The before/after pair is the receipt that the skill actually changes behaviour. If you cannot produce it, the skill is not ready; land it as a draft and merge once the evidence is real.

Bootstrap a new skill by copying template/ verbatim:

cp -r template skills/<skill-name>

Then edit SKILL.md, write POST.md, and capture the before/after pair.

User instructions win

CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and direct user requests override loopkit skills. Only skip a skill workflow when the user has explicitly said to.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a11y-pass

無料

Catch the accessibility failures that ship in almost every AI-built UI. Use after building any interactive component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Before compaction Loopkit extracts decisions into claude-decisions.json (machine-readable). Read it alongside claude-progress.txt at session start — prose is for humans, JSON is for the loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Review a diff against the goal spec assuming the code is BROKEN. The reviewer that lives in the maker's head always agrees with itself — this pulls review into a hostile, separate pass. Invoke after every code change before marking work done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Verify that an endpoint checks ownership, not just authentication. Use on any handler that reads or mutates user data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Find the exact commit that introduced a bug. Use when something worked before and broke, and you don't know which change did it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Before picking new work, smoke-test the last "completed" feature. If it's broken, revert and re-open it before touching anything else. Kills the "looks shipped, isn't shipped" bug across sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive228/loopkit7552026年7月15日 更新

Archive228 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する