本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

task-decomposition

Auto-decompose large tasks into DAG-compatible parallel subtasks

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md8.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Task Decomposition Skill

Analyzes task complexity and decomposes large tasks into smaller, parallelizable subtasks compatible with the DAG orchestration skill. The orchestrator uses this as a planning frontend before execution.

Trigger Conditions

Decomposition is recommended when any of these thresholds are met:

TriggerThresholdRationale
Estimated duration> 30 minutesToo long for single agent
Files affected> 3 filesParallelizable across files
Domains involved> 2 domainsRequires multiple specialists
Agent types needed> 2 typesCross-specialty coordination

Step 0: Pattern Selection

Before decomposing, select the appropriate workflow pattern:

PatternWhen to UsePrimitive
SequentialSteps must execute in order, each depends on previousdag-orchestration (linear)
ParallelIndependent subtasks with no shared stateAgent tool (R009) or Agent Teams (R018)
Evaluator-OptimizerQuality-critical output needing iterative refinementworker-reviewer-pipeline
OrchestratorComplex multi-step with dynamic routingRouting skills (secretary/dev-lead/de-lead/qa-lead)

Decision: If task has independent subtasks → Parallel. If quality-critical → add EO review cycle. If multi-step with dependencies → Sequential/Orchestrator.

Decomposition Process

1. Analyze task scope
   ├── Estimate duration, file count, domains
   ├── Identify required agent types
   └── Check trigger thresholds

2. If thresholds met → decompose:
   ├── Break into atomic subtasks (single agent, single concern)
   ├── Identify dependencies between subtasks
   ├── Map subtasks to agents (use routing skills)
   └── Generate DAG workflow spec

2.5. Validate granularity against pipeline-guards limits:
     ├── For each subtask, estimate file count
     ├── If files > 10 → emit advisory: [Guard] ⚠ Subtask "{id}" assigned {n} files (> 10) — splitting by layer
     ├── If files > 15 → emit hard warning: [Guard] 🛑 Subtask "{id}" assigned {n} files (> 15) — must split
     └── Auto-split oversized subtasks by layer/domain until all ≤ 10

3. Present plan to user (R015 transparency)
   ├── Show decomposed subtasks with agents
   ├── Show dependency graph
   ├── Show estimated parallel execution time
   └── Request confirmation before execution

4. Execute via dag-orchestration skill

Decomposition Heuristics

By File Independence

Task: "Update auth module across 5 files"
  ├── auth.ts → lang-typescript-expert
  ├── middleware.ts → lang-typescript-expert
  ├── config.ts → lang-typescript-expert (independent)
  ├── auth.test.ts → qa-engineer (depends: auth.ts)
  └── README.md → arch-documenter (depends: all above)

DAG: [auth.ts, middleware.ts, config.ts] → auth.test.ts → README.md

By Domain Separation

Task: "Add user profile feature with API and UI"
  ├── API endpoint → be-express-expert
  ├── Database schema → db-postgres-expert
  ├── Frontend component → fe-vercel-agent
  └── Integration test → qa-engineer

DAG: [API, DB] → Frontend → Integration test
     (API and DB are independent, Frontend needs both)

By Layer

Task: "Implement order processing in Spring Boot"
  ├── Domain model → lang-kotlin-expert
  ├── Repository → be-springboot-expert (depends: domain)
  ├── Service → be-springboot-expert (depends: domain, repository)
  ├── Controller → be-springboot-expert (depends: service)
  └── Tests → qa-engineer (depends: all)

DAG: domain → [repository] → service → controller → tests

Output Format

Decomposition Plan

[Task Decomposition]
├── Original: "Add user authentication with JWT"
├── Complexity: High (4 files, 3 domains, ~45 min)
├── Decomposed into 5 subtasks:
│
│   [1] analyze (Explore:haiku)
│       Scan codebase for existing auth patterns
│
│   [2] implement-auth (lang-typescript-expert:sonnet)
│       Implement JWT signing and validation
│       Depends: [1]
│
│   [3] implement-middleware (lang-typescript-expert:sonnet)
│       Create auth middleware
│       Depends: [1]
│
│   [4] write-tests (qa-engineer:sonnet)
│       Write auth tests
│       Depends: [2, 3]
│
│   [5] commit (mgr-gitnerd:sonnet)
│       Commit all changes
│       Depends: [4]
│
├── Parallel layers: 3 (max 2 concurrent in layer 2)
├── Estimated time: ~20 min (vs ~45 min sequential)
└── Proceed? [Y/n]

Generated DAG Spec

workflow:
  name: auto-decomposed-auth
  description: "Auto-decomposed: Add user authentication with JWT"

nodes:
  - id: analyze
    agent: Explore
    model: haiku
    prompt: "Scan codebase for existing auth patterns"
  - id: implement-auth
    agent: lang-typescript-expert
    model: sonnet
    prompt: "Implement JWT signing and validation"
    depends_on: [analyze]
  - id: implement-middleware
    agent: lang-typescript-expert
    model: sonnet
    prompt: "Create auth middleware"
    depends_on: [analyze]
  - id: write-tests
    agent: qa-engineer
    model: sonnet
    prompt: "Write auth tests"
    depends_on: [implement-auth, implement-middleware]
  - id: commit
    agent: mgr-gitnerd
    model: sonnet
    prompt: "Commit all changes"
    depends_on: [write-tests]

config:
  max_parallel: 4
  failure_strategy: stop

Atomic Task Criteria

A subtask is atomic when it meets ALL of:

  • Single agent can handle it
  • Single concern (one logical change)
  • Independently testable outcome
  • < 15 minutes estimated duration
  • < 3 files affected (ideal atomic size)
  • MUST NOT exceed 10 files (pipeline-guards advisory threshold)
  • If > 10 files unavoidable → emit [Guard] warning and split by layer/domain
  • 15 files is a hard violation — always split further (pipeline-guards hard cap)

If a subtask is not atomic → decompose further (max 2 levels deep).

Granularity Validation

After decomposition, validate each subtask against pipeline-guards file limits:

Subtask FilesAction
≤ 3Ideal atomic size — no action
4-10Acceptable — proceed without warning
11-15Advisory warning, attempt further split
> 15Hard warning, MUST split before execution

Validation Process

For each decomposed subtask:

  1. Count estimated files
  2. If > 10: a. Emit: [Guard] ⚠ Subtask "{id}" assigned {n} files (> 10) — splitting by layer b. Attempt split by: layer (domain → adapter → handler) or domain separation c. Re-validate split results
  3. If > 15 after split attempt: a. Emit: [Guard] 🛑 Subtask "{id}" still has {n} files (> 15) — requires user override b. Pause for user confirmation before proceeding

Generated DAG Adjustment

When granularity validation triggers a split, update the DAG spec:

  • Original node is replaced by 2+ child nodes
  • Dependencies are preserved (children inherit parent's deps)
  • max_parallel in config respects R009 limits (soft: 4, hard: 5)

Skip Decomposition When

ConditionReason
Single file editAlready atomic
< 10 minutes estimatedOverhead not worth it
User explicitly requests "just do it"User override
Single domain, single agentNo parallelization benefit

Permission Mode

When spawning agents via the Agent tool during this skill's execution, always pass mode: "bypassPermissions". The Agent tool default (acceptEdits) overrides agent frontmatter permissionMode, causing permission prompts during unattended execution.

Integration

ComponentIntegration
dag-orchestrationGenerates DAG specs consumed by dag-orchestration
Routing skillsUses dev-lead/de-lead/qa-lead routing for agent mapping
R009Maximizes parallelization within max-4 limit
R010Decomposition happens in orchestrator only
R015Plan displayed before execution for user approval
R0183+ agents in plan → check Agent Teams eligibility
pipeline-guardsValidates subtask file count against 10/15 granularity limits

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Pre-action boundary checking — validates agent tool calls against declared capabilities and task contracts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

baekenough/second-brain152026年10月8日 更新

Auto-detect project context and optimize harness — deactivate unused agents/skills, suggest missing experts, generate project profile

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

baekenough/second-brain152026年10月8日 更新

Adversarial code review using attacker mindset — trust boundary, attack surface, business logic, and defense evaluation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

baekenough/second-brain152026年10月8日 更新

Apache Airflow best practices for DAG authoring, testing, and production deployment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

baekenough/second-brain152026年10月8日 更新

Alembic migration patterns for naming conventions, safety checks, expand-contract, env.py configuration, and CI integration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

baekenough/second-brain152026年10月8日 更新

Pre-routing ambiguity analysis — scores request clarity and asks clarifying questions when needed (inspired by ouroboros)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

baekenough/second-brain152026年10月8日 更新

baekenough のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する