Perform various data analysis on SEC 13-F and obtain some insights of fund activities such as number of holdings, AUM, and change of holdings between two quarters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for formulating, solving, debugging, and validating mixed-integer linear optimization models with open-source solvers, including variable indexing, sparse constraints, linearized costs, solver limits, MIP gaps, incumbent extraction, numerical tolerances, and deterministic output reporting.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Use this skill for binary/integer decisions, linear constraints, and linear or piecewise-linear objectives. It is useful for time-expanded scheduling models with many repeated resource-period constraints.
This is a workflow and implementation guide, not a complete formulation for any one task.
Use helper functions or dictionaries, not scattered index arithmetic.
offset = {}
n = 0
def alloc(name, shape, lb=0.0, ub=float("inf"), integer=False):
global n
size = int(np.prod(shape))
idx = np.arange(n, n + size).reshape(shape)
offset[name] = idx
n += size
return idx
u = alloc("commitment", (G, T), lb=0, ub=1, integer=True)
start = alloc("startup", (G, T), lb=0, ub=1, integer=True)
dispatch = alloc("dispatch", (G, T), lb=0)
reserve = alloc("reserve", (G, T), lb=0)
Keep variable ownership obvious: type, resource, period, and optional segment/tier.
Use sparse rows for large time-expanded models:
rows, cols, vals = [], [], []
lb, ub = [], []
row = 0
def add_row(terms, lo, hi):
global row
for j, a in terms:
if abs(a) > 0:
rows.append(row)
cols.append(j)
vals.append(float(a))
lb.append(float(lo))
ub.append(float(hi))
row += 1
Use equality rows for conservation/linking and upper/lower bound rows for capacity, reserve, ramping, timing, and logic.
Write the intended inequality first, then move variable terms to the left-hand side.
# Intended: x + y <= cap * u - reduction * start
# Row form: x + y - cap*u + reduction*start <= 0
add_row(
[(x, 1.0), (y, 1.0), (u, -cap), (start, reduction)],
lo=-INF,
hi=0.0,
)
For non-obvious rows, test a tiny hand case. Example: set u=1, start=1 and check the remaining capacity equals the intended startup capability; set u=1, start=0 and check normal capacity returns.
Keep a checklist linking each model constraint family to a validation check:
transition linking -> startup/shutdown match status
online capacity -> offline zeroes and min/max output
joint reserve capacity -> production plus reserve fits capability
ramp deliverability -> reserve can be deployed within ramp-up
minimum durations -> starts/stops imply required status windows
balance equations -> demand/load/inventory conservation
cost-curve logic -> recomputed objective matches report
If validation checks something not in the model, the solver may produce an invalid report. If the model has a constraint not validated after extraction, conversion bugs can slip through.
Identify the curve convention before modeling:
For segment variables, constrain segment quantities to their widths and sum them to the modeled production quantity. Use slopes only when the data represents total-cost breakpoints or incremental segment costs consistently.
HiGHS through SciPy is a common default when available:
from scipy.optimize import milp, LinearConstraint, Bounds
result = milp(
c=c,
integrality=integrality,
bounds=Bounds(lb, ub),
constraints=constraints,
options={"time_limit": 600.0, "mip_rel_gap": 0.01, "disp": False},
)
if result.x is None:
raise RuntimeError(f"No incumbent: status={result.status}, message={result.message}")
Capture status, objective, incumbent values, and any reliable gap/bound. A time-limit status can be useful if a feasible incumbent exists; a failure with no incumbent is not a solution.
After solving:
"pass" self-checks only after validation passes.First suspect the model encoding. Common causes:
t or t-1 index;Debug in stages: check shapes, relax one family at a time, add diagnostic slack variables, print largest violations, and compare local validation with final requirements.
A fixed-commitment repair LP is useful only if it includes every feasibility family judged in the final report. Do not repair only balance and capacity while omitting transition-dependent ramp, reserve, startup, shutdown, or minimum-duration limits.
Always rerun independent validation after repair.
null/empty gap when no reliable bound exists, if the schema allows it."pass" strings without validation.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Perform various data analysis on SEC 13-F and obtain some insights of fund activities such as number of holdings, AUM, and change of holdings between two quarters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AC branch pi-model power flow equations (P/Q and |S|) with transformer tap ratio and phase shift, matching `acopf-math-model.md` and MATPOWER branch fields. Use when computing branch flows in either direction, aggregating bus injections for nodal balance, checking MVA (rateA) limits, computing branch loading %, or debugging sign/units issues in AC power flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Redact text from PDF documents for blind review anonymization
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when checking simplified ADA-derived plan-view bathroom accessibility constraints such as turning space, door clear width, toilet centerline, grab bars, and lavatory knee/toe clearance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze failed GitHub Action jobs for a pull request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when extracting plan-view architectural geometry from DXF files with semantic CAD layers, especially when outputs must normalize rooms, doors, fixtures, clearances, and grab bars into machine-checkable JSON.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。