This skill should be used when the user asks to "check accessibility", "audit WCAG compliance", "scan HTML for a11y issues", "check color contrast", or "find accessibility violations in web pages".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a trusted capture-and-triage front door so no commitment lives in your head. Use when open loops keep slipping, an inbox has become a backlog, or vague notes never turn into action.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
A reliable front door for every commitment, idea, and open loop — and a processing pass that empties it. Capture is cheap and fails silently: you never notice the thought you didn't record, only the dropped commitment weeks later. This skill covers the capture conventions, the triage decision rules that convert fragments into executable next actions, and the weekly pass that keeps the inbox at zero.
pricing, taxes) rather than actionstext and ideally captured_at, or a markdown bullet listBefore generating, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
Run this at the start of every weekly pass. It does the mechanical sorting so your judgement is spent on the genuinely ambiguous items.
no-verb or unactionable-phrasing using the
grammar <concrete verb> <specific object> <qualifier>.python3 personal-productivity/capture/scripts/capture_triage.py \
--input personal-productivity/capture/assets/sample_capture_log.json \
--today 2026-07-21
Filter to one bucket when working a single destination at a time:
python3 personal-productivity/capture/scripts/capture_triage.py \
--input personal-productivity/capture/assets/sample_capture_log.json \
--today 2026-07-21 --bucket project --format json
Monthly. Answers a different question from triage: not "what is in the inbox" but "is this system actually working."
healthy, at-risk, or failing — and the verdict,
which names the dominant failure (processing vs phrasing).python3 personal-productivity/capture/scripts/capture_audit.py \
--input personal-productivity/capture/assets/sample_capture_log.json \
--today 2026-07-21
Tighten the staleness threshold if you process more than weekly:
python3 personal-productivity/capture/scripts/capture_audit.py \
--input personal-productivity/capture/assets/sample_capture_log.json \
--today 2026-07-21 --stale-days 7 --format json
The load-bearing habit. 45 minutes, same slot weekly, defended like a meeting with someone you respect.
assets/weekly-processing-pass.md and work down it.mkdir -p build
python3 personal-productivity/capture/scripts/capture_triage.py \
--input personal-productivity/capture/assets/sample_capture_log.json \
--today 2026-07-21 --format json > build/triaged.json
Apply in this order for every item. The order prevents the most common error — doing a 90-second task that should have been deleted.
| Step | Question | If no | If yes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Is it actionable? | Reference, someday, or drop | Continue |
| 2 | What does done look like? | It is a decision, not a task | Continue |
| 3 | One step only? | Project + define first action | Action |
| 4 | Under 2 minutes? | Continue | Do it now |
| 5 | Am I the right person? | Delegate + follow-up date | Continue |
| 6 | Date-specific? | Next-actions list | Calendar |
| Decision | Test | [PROVEN] threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Do | Under 2 min and you are in processing mode | 2 min — filing plus re-contextualising exceeds the task past this point |
| Defer | Yours, over 2 min, no one else can do it | Costs a list slot and a weekly re-read, forever |
| Delegate | Someone else is better placed | Always creates a waiting-for entry with a date — 3 working days for same-week items, 1 week otherwise |
| Drop | No meaningful consequence if never done | Survived 3 weekly reviews with no progress = drop it; that is a decision, so record it as one |
Drop is the most under-used outcome and the highest-leverage one. A healthy pass drops 15-25% of items. Below that you are filtering at capture time, which uses exactly the tired, distracted judgement that capture exists to protect you from.
| Metric | Healthy | Warning | Broken |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median inbox age | < 7 days | 7-14 days | > 14 days |
| Share older than 14 days | < 20% | 20-40% | > 40% |
| Share with no concrete verb | < 25% | 25-50% | > 50% |
| Inbox size after a pass | 0-3 | 4-10 | > 10 |
| Capture latency (locked phone to saved text) | < 2 sec | 2-5 sec | > 15 sec — you are running on memory |
Two questions unstick anything. [PROVEN]
If both fail, it is not a task but an unmade decision. File it as
Decide whether to X by <date>.
Mistake: Capturing into six places and reviewing all six, so no single review ever produces the feeling of having seen everything. Why it happens: Each surface was added for a good local reason — voice memos for the car, a notebook for meetings, chat-to-self for links. Nobody decides to have six inboxes; they accumulate. Instead: Keep as many capture surfaces as you need, but exactly one processing inbox (two at the outside, when email is unavoidable). Every surface must drain into it. List every place an unprocessed commitment can currently live, and for each decide: drains into the primary, or is the primary. Anything else gets closed.
Mistake: Deciding whether something is worth capturing before writing it down, to keep the list manageable. Why it happens: A long list feels like failure, so people self-censor. It sounds like discipline. Instead: Capture with zero filtering and filter hard at processing. The judgement you apply mid-meeting or half-asleep is exactly the judgement capture exists to bypass. If your processing pass drops nothing, that is the tell — you are pre-filtering, and the items you silently discard are the small commitments whose loss damages trust most.
Mistake: Leaving items phrased as topics or mental states — pricing, follow up with Sam, think about the roadmap — and reviewing them week after week.
Why it happens: The phrasing feels sufficient at capture time because the full context is still in your head. It evaporates within days, leaving a fragment that reads as a task but cannot be executed.
Instead: Enforce the grammar <concrete verb> <specific object> <qualifier>, where the verb names something physically visible. "Decide," "handle," and "follow up" fail the test. Run capture_triage.py and rewrite everything it flags no-verb — those are the items your mind has been quietly skipping at every review.
Mistake: Reading through the whole inbox during the weekly pass, feeling current, and leaving the items in place. Why it happens: Reading is fast and feels like progress; deciding is slow and each decision has a small cost. Under time pressure, review substitutes for processing. Instead: Inbox zero means every item has physically left the inbox for a specific destination. Items remaining after a pass have had a decision deferred, and the same decision will be deferred next week — that is precisely how a five-item inbox becomes a fifty-item one. If the backlog is genuinely too large, declare bankruptcy on anything over 60 days old and archive it wholesale rather than skipping the pass.
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
scripts/capture_triage.py | Sorts a capture log into action / project / reference / someday / drop, suggests a next action per item, flags 2-minute tasks and unactionable phrasing |
scripts/capture_audit.py | Scores capture-habit health — staleness, rot, phrasing quality, source leaks — and names the dominant failure mode |
references/capture-conventions.md | Friction budget, capture-surface ranking, the one-inbox principle, metadata worth recording, how trust is lost |
references/triage-decision-rules.md | Processing sequence, 2-minute rule constraints, do/defer/delegate/drop tests, vague-to-actionable conversion, weekly pass mechanics |
assets/weekly-processing-pass.md | Timed 45-minute checklist for the weekly inbox-zero pass with outcome-count targets |
assets/capture-log-template.md | Capture-log format, quality reminders, and the JSON schema the scripts read |
assets/sample_capture_log.json | 14-item sample log exercising every bucket and flag, so both workflows run out of the box |
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
This skill should be used when the user asks to "check accessibility", "audit WCAG compliance", "scan HTML for a11y issues", "check color contrast", or "find accessibility violations in web pages".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and analyze A/B tests: sample size, test duration, and statistical significance for conversion experiments. Use when setting up an A/B test, calculating sample size, designing an experiment, or analyzing results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and run statistically rigorous A/B tests and experiments. Use when planning experiments, calculating sample sizes, designing test variants, selecting metrics, analyzing results, or when someone says "let's test that."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sales execution across pipeline, discovery, demos, negotiation, and closing. Use when qualifying opportunities, running MEDDIC discovery, building account plans, handling objections, structuring proposals, or forecasting pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design ad creative across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, Twitter/X, and TikTok with platform format specs, headline formulas, and A/B testing. Use when writing ad copy, generating headline variations, creating ad sets, or validating creative.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer Engine Optimization (AEO): optimize content to be cited by LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) in their answers. Use when designing content for LLM citation, auditing citability, or structuring Q&A schema.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。