Check, clean, verify, and improve IEEE citations, references, BibTeX entries, citation positioning, related-work logic, DOI metadata, venue names, and reference formatting using routed citation and metadata guidance. Use when preparing IEEE manuscripts, fixing bibliography errors, verifying reference completeness, improving related work, checking whether citations support claims, or identifying missing classic/recent baselines.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Use this skill to make citations accurate, IEEE-compliant, and rhetorically useful.
Do not invent references, DOI values, page numbers, venues, or metadata. Follow the routing protocol and load the selected fragments.
manifest.yaml.always_load.task_type: bibtex-cleanup / metadata-check / citation-logic / related-work-gap / format-conversion / reference-audit.source_type: journal-article / conference-paper / book / standard / dataset-code / preprint / web-source / unknown.citation_role: background / method-family / baseline / closest-prior-work / dataset / tool / claim-support.failure_mode: missing-metadata / invented-or-unverified / weak-positioning / missing-classic-work / missing-recent-work / format-error / citation-does-not-support-claim.verification_level: no-web / web-verify / authoritative-only.For reference audits:
Detected axes: task_type=..., source_type=..., citation_role=..., failure_mode=..., verification_level=...
Reference audit
Item | Issue | Risk | Fix | Verification status
For related-work citation logic:
Claim or sentence | Current citation role | Problem | Better citation need
For BibTeX cleanup, return corrected BibTeX only when metadata is supplied or verified. Use placeholders for missing fields.
Do not fabricate references or metadata.
Do not treat 20-30 references as a universal rule.
Do not claim a citation supports a sentence unless the supplied or verified information supports that relationship.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design, audit, and strengthen experimental validation for IEEE manuscripts using routed claim-evidence checks. Use when planning experiments, selecting baselines, designing ablations, choosing metrics, checking fairness, adding robustness tests, explaining results, analyzing complexity, building claim-to-evidence matrices, or responding to reviewer concerns about insufficient experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit, redesign, generate, and improve IEEE manuscript figures, tables, captions, result presentation, plotting scripts, visual polish, hybrid Python/R plus vector-editor workflows, publication-ready matplotlib house style, and layout using routed visual-evidence checks. Use when checking or creating plot readability, axes, legends, line overlap, table structure, metric reporting, captions, grayscale accessibility, IEEE one-column/two-column layout, figure/table placement, claim-evidence mapping, reviewer first-impression risks, matplotlib/seaborn or ggplot2 figure code, SVG/PDF/TIFF/PNG export, Illustrator/Inkscape/PowerPoint/Figma finishing plans, or IEEE-style engineering evidence graphics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose, fix, and improve IEEEtran LaTeX manuscripts using routed template, layout, float, equation, algorithm, table, bibliography, and PDF-compliance guidance. Use when fixing IEEE LaTeX compile errors, overfull boxes, float placement, two-column layout, figure sizing, tables, equations, algorithms, BibTeX, citation commands, template compliance, or final submission PDF checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read, decompose, and analyze IEEE-style papers using routed technical-reading workflows. Use when extracting problem setting, object-method-condition logic, contributions, method pipeline, equations, datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, limitations, replication details, citation role, related-work positioning, implementation notes, or reviewer-style assessment from a paper, PDF, abstract, or manuscript excerpt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Polish, translate, diagnose, and restructure technical manuscript text into IEEE-style academic English using routed failure-mode guidance. Use for IEEE abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, figure captions, rebuttals, Chinese-to-English technical writing, AI-like or template-like academic prose, and engineering prose that needs clearer problem logic, contribution framing, method rationale, evidence discipline, natural author voice, or reviewer-ready wording.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft, diagnose, and improve IEEE rebuttals, revision plans, cover letters, response letters, and point-by-point replies using routed reviewer-comment handling. Use when responding to IEEE reviewer or editor comments about novelty, scope, method, experiments, baselines, figures, tables, citations, writing, LaTeX formatting, limitations, compliance, technical correctness, or reviewer comments that appear generic, contradictory, unsupported, careless, or possibly AI-generated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。