本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ieee-figure-table

Audit, redesign, generate, and improve IEEE manuscript figures, tables, captions, result presentation, plotting scripts, visual polish, hybrid Python/R plus vector-editor workflows, publication-ready matplotlib house style, and layout using routed visual-evidence checks. Use when checking or creating plot readability, axes, legends, line overlap, table structure, metric reporting, captions, grayscale accessibility, IEEE one-column/two-column layout, figure/table placement, claim-evidence mapping, reviewer first-impression risks, matplotlib/seaborn or ggplot2 figure code, SVG/PDF/TIFF/PNG export, Illustrator/Inkscape/PowerPoint/Figma finishing plans, or IEEE-style engineering evidence graphics.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(47)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml246 B
  • manifest.yaml5.4 KB
  • references/ieee-chart-patterns.md2.9 KB
  • references/ieee-export-qa.md2.1 KB
  • references/ieee-hybrid-figure-workflow.md4.1 KB
  • references/ieee-plotting-api.md2.4 KB
  • references/ieee-plotting-contract.md2.1 KB
  • references/ieee-visual-style.md5.4 KB
  • scripts/ieee_figure_backend.py1.5 KB
  • scripts/ieee_plot_style.py11.5 KB
  • static/core/figure-contract.md1.3 KB
  • static/core/first-impression.md478 B
  • static/core/output-format.md405 B
  • static/core/stance.md763 B
  • static/core/workflow.md849 B
  • static/fragments/backend/hybrid.md1.1 KB
  • static/fragments/backend/no-plot.md372 B
  • static/fragments/backend/python.md1.8 KB
  • static/fragments/backend/r.md1.5 KB
  • static/fragments/check_type/accessibility.md309 B
  • static/fragments/check_type/caption.md251 B
  • static/fragments/check_type/evidence-mapping.md275 B
  • static/fragments/check_type/layout.md276 B
  • static/fragments/check_type/readability.md215 B
  • static/fragments/check_type/statistical-presentation.md348 B
  • static/fragments/failure_mode/bad-axis.md203 B
  • static/fragments/failure_mode/blurry-figure.md318 B
  • static/fragments/failure_mode/inconsistent-precision.md246 B
  • static/fragments/failure_mode/misleading-scale.md320 B
  • static/fragments/failure_mode/overlapping-legend.md240 B
  • static/fragments/failure_mode/unreadable-two-column.md295 B
  • static/fragments/failure_mode/weak-caption.md262 B
  • static/fragments/stage/audit.md118 B
  • static/fragments/stage/caption-writing.md182 B
  • static/fragments/stage/latex-placement.md401 B
  • static/fragments/stage/redesign.md251 B
  • static/fragments/visual_type/ablation-table.md319 B
  • static/fragments/visual_type/algorithm-flowchart.md269 B
  • static/fragments/visual_type/architecture-diagram.md864 B
  • static/fragments/visual_type/bar-chart.md371 B
  • static/fragments/visual_type/comparison-table.md315 B
  • static/fragments/visual_type/confusion-matrix.md284 B
  • static/fragments/visual_type/generic.md242 B
  • static/fragments/visual_type/line-plot.md356 B
  • static/fragments/visual_type/multi-panel.md294 B
  • static/fragments/visual_type/scatter.md262 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

IEEE Figure Table Router

Use this skill to make figures and tables function as professional IEEE evidence. The goal is not decoration; it is readable, fair, claim-aligned visual proof that still works after IEEE column scaling.

Do not rely on general design intuition alone. Follow the routing protocol and load the selected fragments.

Routing Protocol

  1. Read manifest.yaml.
  2. Read every file listed under always_load.
  3. Detect the axes:
    • visual_type: line-plot / bar-chart / scatter / confusion-matrix / comparison-table / ablation-table / architecture-diagram / algorithm-flowchart / multi-panel / generic.
    • check_type: readability / accessibility / caption / layout / evidence-mapping / statistical-presentation.
    • failure_mode: blurry-figure / bad-axis / overlapping-legend / misleading-scale / inconsistent-precision / weak-caption / unreadable-two-column.
    • stage: audit / redesign / caption-writing / latex-placement.
    • backend: python / r / hybrid / no-plot. Use hybrid when a figure is partly generated from data/code and partly finished in a vector/design tool. Use no-plot for audit-only, caption-only, table-only, or LaTeX-placement tasks that do not generate plotting code or image files.
  4. For plotting/redrawing tasks, resolve backend by explicit request, input workflow, or saved preference. If the intended output is a mechanism schematic, graphical workflow, polished composite, annotated experiment pipeline, or figure that cannot be cleanly produced end-to-end in Python/R, choose hybrid. If no preference exists for a pure plotting task, ask once: Python or R? I will remember this as your default for IEEE figures.
  5. State the detected axes in one short line.
  6. Load only the matching fragments.
  7. For plotting/redrawing, establish an IEEE figure contract before code: core engineering claim, evidence-panel map, final column size, metric/condition definitions, export formats, visual style target, and QA risks.
  8. Map each figure/table to the claim it supports.
  9. For Python plotting, prefer the bundled scripts/ieee_plot_style.py helper or mirror its API when writing standalone manuscript code. For hybrid figures, separate data-generated layers from manually edited vector/layout layers and keep an edit log.
  10. Report first-impression risks before cosmetic suggestions.

Output Contract

Default output:

Detected axes: visual_type=..., check_type=..., failure_mode=..., stage=..., backend=...

Figure/table audit
Item | Supported claim | First-impression risk | Technical issue | Fix

Priority fixes
1. ...

For caption writing, return revised captions plus missing information placeholders.

For redesign requests, provide concrete plot/table changes rather than generic advice.

For plotting or redraw requests, return:

IEEE figure contract
- Core claim:
- Evidence map:
- Final size:
- Visual style:
- Export bundle:

Files or code:
- ...

QA notes:
- ...

Red Lines

Do not recommend misleading axis scaling.

Do not invent experimental results or statistical significance.

Do not make visual changes that obscure fair comparison, uncertainty, or negative results.

Do not use the official IEEE logo, IEEE marks, or invented acceptance/compliance claims in figures.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Check, clean, verify, and improve IEEE citations, references, BibTeX entries, citation positioning, related-work logic, DOI metadata, venue names, and reference formatting using routed citation and metadata guidance. Use when preparing IEEE manuscripts, fixing bibliography errors, verifying reference completeness, improving related work, checking whether citations support claims, or identifying missing classic/recent baselines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CloudWave818/ieee-skills3672026年8月12日 更新

Design, audit, and strengthen experimental validation for IEEE manuscripts using routed claim-evidence checks. Use when planning experiments, selecting baselines, designing ablations, choosing metrics, checking fairness, adding robustness tests, explaining results, analyzing complexity, building claim-to-evidence matrices, or responding to reviewer concerns about insufficient experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CloudWave818/ieee-skills3672026年8月12日 更新

Diagnose, fix, and improve IEEEtran LaTeX manuscripts using routed template, layout, float, equation, algorithm, table, bibliography, and PDF-compliance guidance. Use when fixing IEEE LaTeX compile errors, overfull boxes, float placement, two-column layout, figure sizing, tables, equations, algorithms, BibTeX, citation commands, template compliance, or final submission PDF checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CloudWave818/ieee-skills3672026年8月12日 更新

Read, decompose, and analyze IEEE-style papers using routed technical-reading workflows. Use when extracting problem setting, object-method-condition logic, contributions, method pipeline, equations, datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, limitations, replication details, citation role, related-work positioning, implementation notes, or reviewer-style assessment from a paper, PDF, abstract, or manuscript excerpt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CloudWave818/ieee-skills3672026年8月12日 更新

Polish, translate, diagnose, and restructure technical manuscript text into IEEE-style academic English using routed failure-mode guidance. Use for IEEE abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, figure captions, rebuttals, Chinese-to-English technical writing, AI-like or template-like academic prose, and engineering prose that needs clearer problem logic, contribution framing, method rationale, evidence discipline, natural author voice, or reviewer-ready wording.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CloudWave818/ieee-skills3672026年8月12日 更新

Draft, diagnose, and improve IEEE rebuttals, revision plans, cover letters, response letters, and point-by-point replies using routed reviewer-comment handling. Use when responding to IEEE reviewer or editor comments about novelty, scope, method, experiments, baselines, figures, tables, citations, writing, LaTeX formatting, limitations, compliance, technical correctness, or reviewer comments that appear generic, contradictory, unsupported, careless, or possibly AI-generated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CloudWave818/ieee-skills3672026年8月12日 更新

CloudWave818 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する