本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

testcontainers-integration-tests

Write integration tests using TestContainers for .NET with xUnit. Covers infrastructure testing with real databases, message queues, and caches in Docker containers instead of mocks.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md7.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Integration Testing with TestContainers

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Writing integration tests that need real infrastructure (databases, caches, message queues)
  • Testing data access layers against actual databases
  • Verifying message queue integrations
  • Testing Redis caching behavior
  • Avoiding mocks for infrastructure components
  • Ensuring tests work against production-like environments
  • Testing database migrations and schema changes

Reference Files

Core Principles

  1. Real Infrastructure Over Mocks - Use actual databases/services in containers, not mocks
  2. Test Isolation - Each test gets fresh containers or fresh data
  3. Automatic Cleanup - TestContainers handles container lifecycle and cleanup
  4. Fast Startup - Reuse containers across tests in the same class when appropriate
  5. CI/CD Compatible - Works seamlessly in Docker-enabled CI environments
  6. Port Randomization - Containers use random ports to avoid conflicts

Why TestContainers Over Mocks?

The Problem with Mocking Infrastructure

// BAD: Mocking a database
public class OrderRepositoryTests
{
    private readonly Mock<IDbConnection> _mockDb = new();

    [Fact]
    public async Task GetOrder_ReturnsOrder()
    {
        // This doesn't test real SQL behavior, constraints, or performance
        _mockDb.Setup(db => db.QueryAsync<Order>(It.IsAny<string>()))
            .ReturnsAsync(new[] { new Order { Id = 1 } });

        var repo = new OrderRepository(_mockDb.Object);
        var order = await repo.GetOrderAsync(1);

        Assert.NotNull(order);
    }
}

Problems: doesn't test actual SQL queries, misses constraints/indexes, gives false confidence, doesn't catch SQL syntax errors.

Better: TestContainers with Real Database

// GOOD: Testing against a real database
public class OrderRepositoryTests : IAsyncLifetime
{
    private readonly TestcontainersContainer _dbContainer;
    private IDbConnection _connection;

    public OrderRepositoryTests()
    {
        _dbContainer = new TestcontainersBuilder<TestcontainersContainer>()
            .WithImage("mcr.microsoft.com/mssql/server:2022-latest")
            .WithEnvironment("ACCEPT_EULA", "Y")
            .WithEnvironment("SA_PASSWORD", "Your_password123")
            .WithPortBinding(1433, true)
            .Build();
    }

    public async Task InitializeAsync()
    {
        await _dbContainer.StartAsync();
        var port = _dbContainer.GetMappedPublicPort(1433);
        var connectionString = $"Server=localhost,{port};Database=TestDb;User Id=sa;Password=Your_password123;TrustServerCertificate=true";
        _connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString);
        await _connection.OpenAsync();
        await RunMigrationsAsync(_connection);
    }

    public async Task DisposeAsync()
    {
        await _connection.DisposeAsync();
        await _dbContainer.DisposeAsync();
    }

    [Fact]
    public async Task GetOrder_WithRealDatabase_ReturnsOrder()
    {
        await _connection.ExecuteAsync(
            "INSERT INTO Orders (Id, CustomerId, Total) VALUES (1, 'CUST1', 100.00)");

        var repo = new OrderRepository(_connection);
        var order = await repo.GetOrderAsync(1);

        Assert.NotNull(order);
        Assert.Equal("CUST1", order.CustomerId);
        Assert.Equal(100.00m, order.Total);
    }
}

See database-patterns.md for complete SQL Server, PostgreSQL, and migration testing examples.

See infrastructure-patterns.md for Redis, RabbitMQ, multi-container networks, container reuse, and Respawn database reset patterns.

Required NuGet Packages

<ItemGroup>
  <PackageReference Include="Testcontainers" Version="*" />
  <PackageReference Include="xunit" Version="*" />
  <PackageReference Include="xunit.runner.visualstudio" Version="*" />

  <!-- Database-specific packages -->
  <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" Version="*" />
  <PackageReference Include="Npgsql" Version="*" /> <!-- For PostgreSQL -->
  <PackageReference Include="MySqlConnector" Version="*" /> <!-- For MySQL -->

  <!-- Other infrastructure -->
  <PackageReference Include="StackExchange.Redis" Version="*" /> <!-- For Redis -->
  <PackageReference Include="RabbitMQ.Client" Version="*" /> <!-- For RabbitMQ -->
</ItemGroup>

Best Practices

  1. Always Use IAsyncLifetime - Proper async setup and teardown
  2. Wait for Port Availability - Use WaitStrategy to ensure containers are ready
  3. Use Random Ports - Let TestContainers assign ports automatically
  4. Clean Data Between Tests - Either use fresh containers or truncate tables
  5. Reuse Containers When Possible - Faster than creating new ones for each test
  6. Test Real Queries - Don't just test mocks; verify actual SQL behavior
  7. Verify Constraints - Test foreign keys, unique constraints, indexes
  8. Test Transactions - Verify rollback and commit behavior
  9. Use Realistic Data - Test with production-like data volumes
  10. Handle Cleanup - Always dispose containers in DisposeAsync

Common Issues and Solutions

Container Startup Timeout

_container = new TestcontainersBuilder<TestcontainersContainer>()
    .WithImage("postgres:latest")
    .WithWaitStrategy(Wait.ForUnixContainer()
        .UntilPortIsAvailable(5432)
        .WithTimeout(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(2)))
    .Build();

Port Already in Use

Always use random port mapping:

.WithPortBinding(5432, true) // true = assign random public port

Containers Not Cleaning Up

Ensure proper disposal:

public async Task DisposeAsync()
{
    await _connection?.DisposeAsync();
    await _container?.DisposeAsync();
}

Tests Fail in CI But Pass Locally

Ensure CI has Docker support:

# GitHub Actions
runs-on: ubuntu-latest # Has Docker pre-installed

CI/CD Integration

GitHub Actions

name: Integration Tests

on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    steps:
    - uses: actions/checkout@v3

    - name: Setup .NET
      uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v3
      with:
        dotnet-version: 9.0.x

    - name: Run Integration Tests
      run: |
        dotnet test tests/YourApp.IntegrationTests \
          --filter Category=Integration \
          --logger trx

    - name: Cleanup Containers
      if: always()
      run: docker container prune -f

Performance Tips

  1. Reuse containers - Share fixtures across tests in a collection
  2. Use Respawn - Reset data without recreating containers
  3. Parallel execution - TestContainers handles port conflicts automatically
  4. Use lightweight images - Alpine versions are smaller and faster
  5. Cache images - Docker will cache pulled images locally

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," or "hypothesis." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ComeOnOliver/skillshub652026年6月24日 更新

Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ComeOnOliver/skillshub652026年6月24日 更新

Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.2 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ComeOnOliver/skillshub652026年6月24日 更新

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an agent", "add an agent", "write a subagent", "agent frontmatter", "when to use description", "agent examples", "agent tools", "agent colors", "autonomous agent", or needs guidance on agent structure, system prompts, triggering conditions, or agent development best practices for Claude Code plugins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ComeOnOliver/skillshub652026年6月24日 更新

Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ComeOnOliver/skillshub652026年6月24日 更新

Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ComeOnOliver/skillshub652026年6月24日 更新

ComeOnOliver のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する