本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

agent-creator

Design and scaffold new skills, subagents, and MCP surfaces. Use when choosing which primitive to create. NOT for invoking existing agents, generic coding help, or deployment work.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(10)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB
  • affordance-scorecard.json1021 B
  • CHANGELOG.md2.3 KB
  • diagrams/01_flowchart_decision-points.md561 B
  • diagrams/INDEX.md150 B
  • references/agent-templates.md3.3 KB
  • references/creation-process.md3.4 KB
  • references/effect-boundary-contract.md686 B
  • references/INDEX.md997 B
  • references/mcp-integration.md3.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Agent Creator

Meta-skill for choosing the right extension primitive and then authoring it cleanly.

When to Use

  • Creating a new skill, agent, or MCP-backed capability from a concrete product need.
  • Deciding whether an existing capability should be repaired, wrapped, or replaced.
  • Translating a domain brief into boundaries, examples, references, and validation steps.
  • Scaffolding a first version that other skills can then critique or improve.

NOT for Boundaries

  • Simply using an existing skill or subagent; invoke it directly instead.
  • Generic application coding with no agent, skill, or MCP design decision involved.
  • Infra or deployment setup for servers or apps.
  • Treating "make a new agent" as the default when an existing skill already covers the need.

Decision Points

flowchart TD
  A[Capability request] --> B{What is missing?}
  B -->|Reusable judgment with existing tools| C[Create or repair a skill]
  B -->|Isolated execution or delegated context| D[Create a subagent]
  B -->|New external tools, API surface, or durable state| E[Design an MCP server]
  C --> F[Write boundaries, examples, and validation first]
  D --> F
  E --> G[Define the MCP boundary, then hand implementation to mcp-creator]
  F --> H{Need more structure?}
  H -->|Yes| I[Add references, scripts, or templates only if they improve reuse]
  H -->|No| J[Keep the bundle lean]
  I --> K[Validate before handoff]
  J --> K

See diagrams/01_flowchart_decision-points.md for the companion routing diagram.

  1. First decide whether the missing capability is a skill, a subagent, or an MCP server.
  2. If the capability is mostly judgment and reusable prompting, start with a skill.
  3. If it needs isolated execution, independent context, or delegated specialization, consider a subagent.
  4. If it needs new external tools or stateful APIs, it is probably an MCP problem.
  5. If multiple designs are plausible, use a forked planning pass before committing files.

Primitive Selection

Choose a skill when

  • The capability is mostly encoded judgment, routing, or structured guidance.
  • The runtime can rely on existing tools.
  • Progressive disclosure and references matter more than standalone execution.

Choose a subagent when

  • The work benefits from isolated context or delegated reasoning.
  • You want a specialist to execute independently and hand back a result.

Choose MCP when

  • The capability requires new external tools, durable state, or a transport surface beyond prompt design.

Workflow

  1. Capture the trigger set and negative triggers.
  2. Define the smallest primitive that solves the problem.
  3. Write the boundaries and output contract before drafting the body.
  4. Add references/, examples/, or scripts/ only when they improve determinism or reuse.
  5. Use Glob, Grep, and Read to inspect adjacent patterns before inventing new structure.
  6. Use Write and Edit for the actual bundle changes.
  7. Use scoped Bash only when a real local scaffolder or validator exists in the active repo or installed skill library.
  8. Use WebSearch and WebFetch only when the user explicitly needs current external docs or package guidance.

Consequential capability contract

Before scaffolding a primitive that can cause an external effect, define the effect inventory, credential and policy boundary, stable idempotency identity, independent verification source, timeout state, and safe termination behavior. An uncertain remote commit is a reconciliation state, not permission to retry. Use a crash/retry/duplicate- successor matrix before implementation; escalate when the provider cannot reconcile. See references/effect-boundary-contract.md.

Failure Modes and Common Anti-Patterns

  • Creating a new primitive before checking whether an existing one already fits.
  • Writing a generic persona with no boundary or distinctive operating model.
  • Shipping a knowledge dump instead of a reusable runtime surface.
  • Adding scripts, tools, or references that the body never uses.
  • Treating MCP as a formatting choice instead of an external-capability decision.

Worked Examples

Example 1: Database optimization helper

  • Capability is mostly judgment plus codebase inspection.
  • Start with a skill or subagent, not MCP.
  • Add references for indexing and query analysis only if the core body would become bloated.

Example 2: Ticketing-system integration

  • The requirement includes authenticated API access and live ticket actions.
  • That is MCP-backed capability, not just a skill rewrite.
  • Use this skill to define the boundary, then hand implementation to mcp-creator.

Quality Gates

  • The chosen primitive matches the capability, not the author's habit.
  • The description states what it does, when to use it, and when not to use it.
  • The bundle has concrete examples or references where ambiguity would otherwise remain.
  • The skill or agent body names the tools it actually expects to use.
  • Validation happens before handoff, not after the next person trips over the gap.

References

  • See references/INDEX.md for targeted loads.
  • See references/agent-templates.md for starter shapes.
  • See references/creation-process.md for the broader authoring sequence.
  • See references/mcp-integration.md when the design boundary points toward MCP.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

curiositech のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する