本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

operating-model-bootstrap

Bootstrap or harden a project's operating model for mixed human and AI delivery teams. Use when starting a repository, adopting an agent harness, defining authority and risk tiers, coordinating parallel agents safely, binding evidence and review to an exact candidate, or correcting fragmented rules that prevent coherent, consistent, complete delivery.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(18)

  • SKILL.md14.2 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml246 B
  • assets/adapters/AGENTS.md.template1.1 KB
  • assets/adapters/CLAUDE.md.template1.1 KB
  • assets/adapters/GEMINI.md.template1.1 KB
  • assets/CHANGELOG.template.md387 B
  • assets/CHECKPOINT.template.yaml1.3 KB
  • assets/DELIVERY-WORKFLOW.template.md3.3 KB
  • assets/EVIDENCE-MANIFEST.template.yaml1.2 KB
  • assets/OPERATING-MANUAL.md17.2 KB
  • assets/PROJECT-OPERATING-PROFILE.template.md12.0 KB
  • assets/ROADMAP.template.md1.1 KB
  • assets/STATUS.template.md792 B
  • assets/VISION.template.md2.7 KB
  • references/DAY-ONE-EXAMPLE.md3.7 KB
  • scripts/bootstrap_operating_model.py7.4 KB
  • scripts/inspect_repo.py10.4 KB
  • scripts/validate_operating_model.py13.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Operating Model Bootstrap

When to use

  • Starting a new repository or team project that will use AI agents or agent-harness skills
  • Adopting this harness into an existing project for the first time
  • Defining or repairing authority, risk tiers, lane isolation, or evidence-binding contracts
  • Coordinating parallel human and agent lanes safely (worktrees, ownership, integration)
  • Binding review to an exact candidate commit before R2/R3 work
  • Correcting fragmented or contradictory rules across AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, and GEMINI.md

Establish a portable operating kernel and one tracked project profile. Treat humans, agents, skills, tools, and gates as one delivery system with explicit authority, ownership, evidence, and completion semantics. The day-one seed lets a new team begin system design and delivery planning while explicitly owned project unknowns are resolved.

Project awareness — seven areas to establish at init

The bootstrap must establish or explicitly own each of the following. Required areas must be answered before the profile leaves seed state. Optional areas have a recommended default; record not yet established — owner: role; required before: trigger for any unknown rather than leaving it blank or fabricating a value.

#AreaStatusDefault if not declared
1Product vision, objectives, actors, scope, out-of-scope, SOW / acceptance recordRequiredNone — must be declared
2Team roster: PO, SMEs, integration owner, reviewer roles, escalation pathRequiredNone — must be declared
3Technical stack: language, framework, architecture, repos, interfaces, runtimeRequiredNone — must be declared
4Tooling: package manager, linter, type checker, unit / integration / e2e test commandsOptional — recommended defaultsLinting + validation + unit tests minimum
5Cloud, hosting, data classification, residency, compliance, approved-vendor constraintsOptional — advisedDeduced from stack; invoke governance-guardrail to confirm policy alignment
6Automation: CI/CD, branch policy, release process, deployment owner, rollbackOptional — default providedGitHub SemVer + tag-based releases; invoke release-manager to document and confirm
7Delivery controls: source of truth, issue/PR conventions, DoD, escalation triggersOptional — default providedGitHub stack; this repository's issues, ADRs, and architecture docs are the source of truth

Backfill from an existing repo

When adopting into a repo that already has code, do not present a blank seven-area form. Run the read-only inspection pass to pre-fill what the repository already reveals:

python3 .agents/skills/operating-model-bootstrap/scripts/inspect_repo.py .

It reads manifests, tool configs, CI, CODEOWNERS, and docs, and prints inferred findings — each a machine guess with an evidence pointer and the exact inferred — source: <evidence>; confirm: <role> marker to paste into the profile. Rules:

  • Transcribe each finding into the profile as its inferred marker; never silently promote it to a verified fact.
  • Confirm inferred fields one at a time with the named human; a confirmed field becomes a plain verified value. The profile cannot go active while any inferred field remains (the validator enforces this).
  • The pass is read-only and never infers authority — CODEOWNERS handles are roster candidates only; role and accountability stay unknown until a human assigns them.

Init artefacts

The initializer script seeds structure, not decisions. Running bootstrap (or the init command, which runs bootstrap first) creates these records with template content to be grounded from verified project evidence:

  • docs/operating-model/PROJECT-OPERATING-PROFILE.md — the project contract, holding the seven-area answers above.
  • docs/VISION.md — product vision, objectives, actors, scope, and out-of-scope (area 1).
  • docs/ROADMAP.md — the big-picture scope of work: ordered outcome gates, seeded unpopulated. The team adds dates as the Product Owner confirms them.
  • docs/STATUS.md — the derived situation-report structure, seeded unpopulated.
  • docs/operating-model/DELIVERY-WORKFLOW.md, CHANGELOG.md, and the AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md / GEMINI.md adapters.

The script seeds structure; the agent records the decisions. As part of the bootstrap workflow, capture the choices made during init as durable, referenceable authority:

  • Baseline ADR — author the project's first architecture decision record at its ADR convention (ADR/ADR-0000-baseline-structure-DRAFT.md, approved to -approved.md; see the-architect), capturing every choice confirmed or deferred during init, with the owner and resolving trigger for each explicit unknown. This is the authority record for the starting structure.
  • First status entry — add one entry to docs/STATUS.md recording the initialization event and the open unknowns. This records what happened, not invented progress; roadmap outcomes stay unpopulated until the Product Owner validates them.

Do not fabricate answers to populate any of these files. An honest unknown — owner: X; required before: Y is better than a plausible-sounding invention that will mislead every agent that later reads the profile.

Portability boundary

The operating model is model-, vendor-, and IDE-agnostic. Thin surface adapters only make the same contract discoverable and invocable. They may not change authority, risk, evidence, review, or completion semantics. This is a team-project harness bootstrap, not a production application scaffold or a substitute for project/domain controls.

Load the assets

Read the four contract assets before editing the target project:

  • assets/OPERATING-MANUAL.md — released vendor-neutral normative kernel; copy it unchanged.
  • assets/PROJECT-OPERATING-PROFILE.template.md — project-specific contract.
  • assets/CHECKPOINT.template.yaml — durable state for R2/R3 work.
  • assets/EVIDENCE-MANIFEST.template.yaml — exact-candidate evidence and review record.

Read the five planning-seed assets before initialising project delivery records:

  • assets/VISION.template.md — durable product direction and initial focus.
  • assets/DELIVERY-WORKFLOW.template.md — project mapping of the shared lifecycle.
  • assets/ROADMAP.template.md — ordered outcome gates, initially unpopulated.
  • assets/STATUS.template.md — derived situation-report structure, initially unpopulated.
  • assets/CHANGELOG.template.md — project release-history structure.

Use the thin starter files under assets/adapters/ for agent surfaces the target project supports. They are discovery adapters, not competing constitutions. For a greenfield adoption, read references/DAY-ONE-EXAMPLE.md to calibrate what may start in seed state and what must wait for active controls.

Do not copy project details into the universal manual. Bind its exact SHA-256 in the profile and adapters. Unknown profile facts must be owned and time-bounded, never fabricated. Never call a seed profile active while applicable placeholders remain.

Initialise safely

From a target repository containing this skill, preflight and install the day-one seed:

python3 .agents/skills/operating-model-bootstrap/scripts/bootstrap_operating_model.py \
  --dry-run --project-name "<project name>" .
python3 .agents/skills/operating-model-bootstrap/scripts/bootstrap_operating_model.py \
  --project-name "<project name>" .

The initializer creates the manual, seed profile, checkpoint/evidence templates, vision, delivery workflow, blank roadmap/status structures, project changelog, and AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, and GEMINI.md adapters. It preflights the whole file set, preserves different existing project planning records, and refuses conflicting operating contracts or adapters before writing anything. Map existing planning records in the profile; merge a protected contract deliberately rather than forcing replacement.

Bootstrap workflow

  1. Ground the project. Read its existing constitutions, architecture, delivery flow, test commands, deployment path, protected surfaces, and current state. List contradictions and stale claims before adding policy.
  2. Classify risk. Map project work into R0–R3. Round ambiguity upward. Name the highest-impact silent failure, rollback owner, and observation surface.
  3. Confirm authority. Separate useful intent from permission at the classified risk tier. Obtain explicit approval before constitutional, destructive, credential, external, deployment, production-data, or capital changes.
  4. Install the kernel. Run the safe initializer or copy the released manual byte for byte to the canonical governance location. Record version, digest, owner, adoption status, and review trigger.
  5. Ground the profile. Resolve the day-one minimum first. Fill applicable fields with verified facts and use not applicable — reason or not yet established — owner: role; required before: trigger elsewhere. Keep status seed for design/R0/R1; require active and runnable controls before R2/R3. Never invent a command, role, or control.
  6. Route baseline skills. Confirm paths or equivalents for orchestration, architecture, specification, domain/adversarial validation, candidate review, release readiness, status, and cost. Invocation syntax may vary; semantics may not.
  7. Define the squad. Assign one accountable human/operator, one integration owner, bounded mutating lanes, and independent reviewers. Give every lane owned files, owned resources, and a falsifiable success test. A skill supplies capability; it never supplies authority.
  8. Wire lightweight adapters. Use only the adapters the team needs. Keep the generated protected block identical across surfaces and surface-specific workflow details outside it. Run the deterministic drift check.
  9. Isolate mutation. Require one branch/worktree and resource namespace per mutating lane. Read-only reviewers may share. Only the integration owner assembles pinned lane commits in a clean worktree.
  10. Bind evidence. Instantiate both checkpoint and evidence-manifest assets for R2/R3. Retain exact base/candidate identity, commands, exit status, environment, data provenance, artifacts, reviewers, conditions, and rollback. Any candidate change invalidates prior review.
  11. Enforce verdicts. PASS means zero conditions. Conditional/amendment verdicts block until fixed and re-reviewed; REJECT/BLOCKING halts. Make any override an explicit operator path with a durable reason, never a passing reviewer token.
  12. Close the lifecycle. Run focused and convergence gates, obtain independent review of the exact integrated candidate, deliver only with authority, observe the result, and reconcile status, changelog, HLD/runbooks, evidence, open risk, and rollback.

Minimum mechanical controls

Implement controls proportionate to the project:

  • a profile/adapter drift check;
  • a protected-path gate that detects edits, modes, deletions, and renames;
  • regression-first tests for defects;
  • one convergence command for the assembled candidate;
  • secret and dependency scanning;
  • exact-snapshot review invalidation;
  • post-delivery health/rollback checks.

Prefer a required remote check or signed attestation for high-risk approval. A local hook is defence in depth and does not authenticate reviewer identity.

Validation

Before completion:

  1. Validate the distributed assets before adoption:

    python3 .agents/skills/operating-model-bootstrap/scripts/validate_operating_model.py \
      --template-root .agents/skills/operating-model-bootstrap
    
  2. Validate an adopted seed. Before R2/R3, repeat with --require-active and pass the resolved checkpoint/evidence paths:

    python3 .agents/skills/operating-model-bootstrap/scripts/validate_operating_model.py \
      --target .
    python3 .agents/skills/operating-model-bootstrap/scripts/validate_operating_model.py \
      --target . --require-active \
      --checkpoint docs/operating-model/checkpoints/<task-id>.yaml \
      --evidence docs/operating-model/evidence/<task-id>.yaml
    
  3. Verify all mutating lanes and external resources have one owner.

  4. Change one adapter inside its protected block; confirm semantic drift fails.

  5. Rename a protected file; confirm the project-specific protected-path gate catches it.

  6. Change the candidate after review; confirm checkpoint/evidence binding fails or is stale.

  7. Run the project's lint, type, test, security, and convergence commands.

  8. Run the Adversarial Gate: name how authority, isolation, evidence, delivery, or observation could still fail silently.

Required outputs

  • Adopted universal manual with version/digest.
  • Completed, tracked project operating profile with all seven project-awareness areas recorded (verified fact or explicit unknown with owner and trigger).
  • ADR/ADR-0000-baseline-structure-DRAFT.md (approved to -approved.md) — baseline ADR capturing all init decisions and deferred unknowns.
  • Initializer-seeded docs/VISION.md, docs/ROADMAP.md, and docs/STATUS.md, grounded from evidence; the first docs/STATUS.md entry records the init event and open unknowns.
  • Grounded delivery workflow plus project changelog.
  • Lightweight surface adapters plus drift enforcement.
  • Durable checkpoint for active R2/R3 work.
  • Exact-candidate evidence manifest for active R2/R3 work.
  • Validation evidence and explicitly owned unresolved platform/operator actions.
  • Updated project status, changelog, and architecture/runbook documentation when the operating contract or delivery flow changes.

Do not claim complete enforcement while local checks remain bypassable, reviewer identity is unauthenticated, credentials remain exposed, or delivery has not been observed.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Google ADK (Agent Development Kit) orchestration patterns — boundaries, agent composition, and tool seams. Trigger when designing or reviewing multi-agent systems built on ADK. Authoritative source: adk.dev.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience122026年10月6日 更新

JP's signature red-team pass — "how would I break this?" Argue against your own approach before proceeding. Trigger on any high-stakes decision, architecture choice, or before marking work complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience122026年10月6日 更新

Read-only SRE checkup of any GCP project: deterministic probes of the edge, Cloud Run services, 7-day error logs, Cloud Scheduler, alert policies and uptime checks, Secret Manager and IAM, the data stores and the machine's own scheduled jobs, audited into one fixed status table (LIVE / WARNING / RED / INCONCLUSIVE) with evidence, findings by severity, what could not be checked, and a single OVERALL line delivered as one notification. Parametrised by a per-project manifest, so the same routine runs on every project. Use when the operator says "cloud checkup", "SRE check", "is everything live", "what's healthy / warning / red", "any errors this week", "audit the infra", "weekly checkup", "set up the weekly checkup", before a deploy or demo, or after an incident. Cloud Run first; App Engine and GKE differ only in the serving probes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience122026年10月6日 更新

Cloud guardrails for any vendor workload — Google Cloud (GCP, Vertex AI, GKE), AWS (IAM, EKS, Bedrock), Azure (Entra ID, Policy, AKS), Alibaba Cloud (RAM, mainland/international residency). Enforces identity least-privilege, mechanical policy, data boundaries, residency, cost caps, network egress and observability, with official-source validation before any claim. Trigger on any cloud infrastructure design, review, Terraform plan, or LLM/agent deployment; the-architect routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience122026年10月6日 更新

LLM and cloud cost awareness — model tiering, token budgets, right-sizing, and when a cheaper model suffices. Trigger before finalising any architecture that calls LLMs, before scaling a workload, or when a cost estimate is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience122026年10月6日 更新

Decompose an epic into atomic parallelizable tasks, route each to the right skill, and keep the four delivery records straight — issues, STATUS, ROADMAP, CHANGELOG. Use as a meta-router when several skills could apply, and as the baseline for how delivery state is recorded. Trigger at the start of any multi-track epic, when the skill count exceeds ~12, or when the records have drifted from reality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience122026年10月6日 更新

jpantsjoha のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する