Google ADK (Agent Development Kit) orchestration patterns — boundaries, agent composition, and tool seams. Trigger when designing or reviewing multi-agent systems built on ADK. Authoritative source: adk.dev.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Force plan, HLD, ADRs, and constraints to exist BEFORE any code is generated. Trigger when starting a new feature, epic, or significant change.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Review the spec harder than the code. The cheapest place to be wrong is the spec.
The harness runs in this order: spec → plan → tasks → code. Skipping the spec is not faster — it is a deferred rewrite.
docs/VISION.md or equivalent per project structure). If not, create or update it before proceeding.ADR-NNN).requirements/FEATURE_SPEC.md (or equivalent per project structure)architecture/decisions/ADR-NNN-<short-title>.md (one per decision)architecture/HLD-<feature>.md (if not already covered)docs/ROADMAP.md or equivalent per project structure) with new tasks or milestones| Excuse the agent makes | Counter |
|---|---|
| "I have enough context to start coding" | No spec = no acceptance criteria = no way to know if the output is correct. Write the spec. |
| "The spec will slow us down" | A missing spec causes rewrites. Rewrites cost more than specs. |
| "The requirements are obvious" | Obvious requirements are the ones most often wrong. Write them down and verify. |
| "We can spec it after the prototype" | Prototypes become production. Spec it now. |
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Google ADK (Agent Development Kit) orchestration patterns — boundaries, agent composition, and tool seams. Trigger when designing or reviewing multi-agent systems built on ADK. Authoritative source: adk.dev.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JP's signature red-team pass — "how would I break this?" Argue against your own approach before proceeding. Trigger on any high-stakes decision, architecture choice, or before marking work complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only SRE checkup of any GCP project: deterministic probes of the edge, Cloud Run services, 7-day error logs, Cloud Scheduler, alert policies and uptime checks, Secret Manager and IAM, the data stores and the machine's own scheduled jobs, audited into one fixed status table (LIVE / WARNING / RED / INCONCLUSIVE) with evidence, findings by severity, what could not be checked, and a single OVERALL line delivered as one notification. Parametrised by a per-project manifest, so the same routine runs on every project. Use when the operator says "cloud checkup", "SRE check", "is everything live", "what's healthy / warning / red", "any errors this week", "audit the infra", "weekly checkup", "set up the weekly checkup", before a deploy or demo, or after an incident. Cloud Run first; App Engine and GKE differ only in the serving probes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cloud guardrails for any vendor workload — Google Cloud (GCP, Vertex AI, GKE), AWS (IAM, EKS, Bedrock), Azure (Entra ID, Policy, AKS), Alibaba Cloud (RAM, mainland/international residency). Enforces identity least-privilege, mechanical policy, data boundaries, residency, cost caps, network egress and observability, with official-source validation before any claim. Trigger on any cloud infrastructure design, review, Terraform plan, or LLM/agent deployment; the-architect routes here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM and cloud cost awareness — model tiering, token budgets, right-sizing, and when a cheaper model suffices. Trigger before finalising any architecture that calls LLMs, before scaling a workload, or when a cost estimate is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decompose an epic into atomic parallelizable tasks, route each to the right skill, and keep the four delivery records straight — issues, STATUS, ROADMAP, CHANGELOG. Use as a meta-router when several skills could apply, and as the baseline for how delivery state is recorded. Trigger at the start of any multi-track epic, when the skill count exceeds ~12, or when the records have drifted from reality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。