新しい機能や企画を作り始める前に、対話で目的や希望、制約を整理します。必要に応じて図や試作品で認識を確かめ、作業の規模に合った設計をまとめるスキルです。
- 新機能の目的を明確にしたいとき
- 講演や事業のアイデア整理
- 画面や部屋の配置を見比べたいとき
実装完了後に全テストを確認し、ローカルでのマージ、Pull Request作成、現状維持を選んで進めます。選択と作業環境に応じてブランチや作業領域を整理します。
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
実装が終わった開発ブランチについて、テスト確認から統合方法の選択、後片付けまで進めます。全テストの成功を確認し、通常の作業場所か別の作業領域か、名前のあるブランチかを調べます。そのうえで、ローカルでのマージ、Pull Request作成、現状維持の選択肢を提示し、利用者の選択を実行します。マージ後は再度テストし、成功してから対象の作業領域とブランチを整理します。
開発を終えた変更をどの方法で取り込むか決めたいときに向いています。レビューに出す作業領域を残したり、未コミットのファイルを確認してから片付けたりする手順も含みます。
Pull Requestを作って」Gitとプロジェクトのテスト実行環境を使います。テストが失敗した場合は完了処理を止めます。Pull Request作成には利用先のCLIなどを使い、作成後も作業領域を保持します。ブランチに属していないdetached HEADではローカルマージを提示しません。変更の破棄は明示的な依頼とdiscardという確認入力を必要とします。
この紹介文は、公開されている SKILL.md をもとに AI(Claude Haiku)が作成しました。正確な仕様は下の原文を確認してください。
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Core principle: Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
Run the project's full test suite (npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...).
If tests fail, report the failures and stop — the menu comes after a green suite:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]
If tests pass: continue to Step 2.
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
# Capture now, while still inside the workspace — Step 5 changes directory
# before cleanup (Step 6) needs this value
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:
| State | Menu | Cleanup |
|---|---|---|
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo) | Standard 3 options | No worktree to clean up |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, named branch | Standard 3 options | Provenance-based (see Step 6) |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, detached HEAD | Reduced 2 options (no merge) | Externally managed — leave in place |
The base branch is whatever this work forked from — usually named in the plan, the conversation, or the branch's upstream. If it is not already known, ask: "This branch split from <your best guess> - is that correct?" Confirm before merging: merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.
Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 3 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
Which option?
Detached HEAD — present exactly these 2 options:
Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace).
1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request
2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later)
Which option?
Present the menu exactly as written — concise, with every option coming from the list above. Discarding the work happens only in response to your human partner explicitly asking for it (see "If your human partner asks to discard the work" below). Wait for their answer; the integration decision is theirs.
# Get main repo root for CWD safety
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
# Merge first — verify success before removing anything
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>
# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>
If tests fail on the merged result: stop, leave the worktree and branch in place, and investigate — nothing has been pushed, so the merge is local and recoverable.
Once the merged result is green: clean up the worktree (Step 6), then delete the branch:
git branch -d <feature-branch>
git push -u origin <feature-branch>
# From a detached HEAD, name the new branch on the remote:
# git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/<new-branch>
Then create the pull/merge request against <base-branch> with the forge's tooling — its CLI if one is available, or the creation URL most forges print when you push — following the repo's PR template and conventions if present, and report the URL to your human partner.
Keep the worktree — your human partner iterates on PR feedback there.
Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."
This path exists only as a response to an explicit request to throw the work away. Confirm first:
This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>
Type 'discard' to confirm.
Wait for that exact confirmation. When it arrives:
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
Then clean up the worktree (Step 6) and force-delete the branch:
git branch -D <feature-branch>
Runs for Option 1 and confirmed discards. Options 2 and 3 always
preserve the worktree. Both callers have already changed directory to the
main repo root — worktree removal must run from outside the worktree —
and use the GIT_DIR/GIT_COMMON/WORKTREE_PATH values captured in
Step 2, from before that directory change.
If GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON: Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.
If WORKTREE_PATH is under .worktrees/ or worktrees/: Superpowers
created this worktree — we own cleanup:
git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH"
git worktree prune # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations
If removal is refused (contains modified or untracked files): the
worktree holds files that exist nowhere else — uncommitted plans, notes,
or scratch work. Never --force on your own initiative. Show your human
partner what is at stake and ask:
git -C "$WORKTREE_PATH" status --porcelain -uall
Worktree removal refused — these files were never committed:
<file list>
1. Commit them to <branch> before cleanup
2. Move them into <main repo root>
3. Delete them (unrecoverable)
Which?
Carry out the choice, then remove the worktree.
Otherwise: The host environment owns this workspace — leave it in place. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it.
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Merge locally | yes | - | - | yes |
| 2. Create PR | - | yes | yes | - |
| 3. Keep as-is | - | - | yes | - |
| Discard (explicit request only) | - | - | - | yes (force) |
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Tests passed earlier this session" | Run the suite on the tree you are about to integrate. A green run only proves the tree it ran on. |
| "They obviously want it merged" | Integration is your human partner's decision. Present the menu and wait. |
| "They seem done with this feature — I'll offer to discard it" | The menu is complete as written. Discard happens only when your human partner asks for it in so many words. |
| "'Yeah, get rid of it' counts as confirmation" | Only the typed word discard authorizes deletion. |
| "The PR is up, so the worktree is clutter now" | PR feedback gets fixed in that worktree. It stays until the work lands. |
| "This other worktree looks stale — I'll clean it too" | Clean up only worktrees under .worktrees/ or worktrees/. Everything else belongs to the host. |
"Removal refused — --force is just finishing the cleanup" | The refusal means files exist only in that worktree. --force destroys them permanently. Show your human partner and ask. |
| "The merged-result failure is probably flaky" | A failing merged result stops everything. Branch and worktree stay put while you investigate. |
| "The base branch is obviously main" | Confirm the fork point or ask. Merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo. |
| "The push was rejected — force-push will fix it" | A rejected push means the remote moved. Investigate; force-push only on your human partner's explicit request. |
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
新しい機能や企画を作り始める前に、対話で目的や希望、制約を整理します。必要に応じて図や試作品で認識を確かめ、作業の規模に合った設計をまとめるスキルです。
superpowersの作業記録を読み、作業の重複や計画逸脱、時間・トークン消費などを調べます。ファイルの行番号を根拠に、経緯を報告書へまとめるスキルです。
互いに依存しない不具合やテスト失敗を別々のエージェントに割り当て、並行して調査・修正するスキル。担当範囲を明確にし、結果の確認と変更の統合まで案内します。
作成済みの実装計画を、同じセッションでタスクごとに実行します。テストの失敗と成功、進捗や判断を記録し、最後にブランチ全体をレビューするスキルです。
コードレビューの指摘を実際のコードや対応環境と照らし合わせ、妥当性を確認します。不明点の整理、根拠を示した返答、修正ごとのテストまで進めるスキルです。
機能の実装後やマージ前に、別のエージェントへコードレビューを依頼します。変更内容と要件、対象のコミットを渡し、指摘の重要度に応じて修正を進めるスキルです。