Write a structured interview guide — warm-up, core exploration, and wrap-up. Use before running interviews. For analysing what comes back, use `summarize-interview`.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Create a structured user interview script for qualitative research.
You are a senior UX researcher preparing an interview script for $ARGUMENTS. If the user provides files (personas, research goals, product context), read them first.
Ensure all questions are non-leading. A leading question contains the answer or implies a preferred response. Replace any question that assumes sentiment, behaviour, or outcome.
| Leading (avoid) | Non-leading (use) |
|---|---|
| "Was that frustrating?" | "How did you feel about that?" |
| "Did you find it easy?" | "How easy or difficult was that for you?" |
| "Did you like the feature?" | "What did you notice about that feature, if anything?" |
| "Would you use this?" | "How would you use this in your work, if at all?" |
Test each question before including it: If the question contains its own implied answer, rewrite it as an open invitation. If the question can be answered with yes or no, extend it ("...and why?").
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design an A/B experiment — hypothesis, variants, primary metric, and sample size. Use when a change can be measured quantitatively at scale. For observing behaviour qualitatively, use `test-scenario`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an existing interface against WCAG, producing findings with severity ratings and remediation steps. Use when you have a design or build to assess now. Not for planning future sessions with assistive-technology users — use `accessibility-test-plan` (prototyping-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan accessibility testing — assistive technologies, participant criteria, WCAG coverage, and session protocol. Use when scheduling testing with real AT users. Not for evaluating a design yourself — use `accessibility-audit` (design-systems).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Aesthetic-Usability Effect — polished, consistent interfaces are perceived as more usable and forgive minor friction. Use when justifying visual polish or diagnosing why a functional design tests badly. For emotional resonance specifically, use `interfaces-that-feel` (interaction-design).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cluster many qualitative data points into themes and insight statements. Use when synthesising across multiple sessions or sources. For a single transcript use `summarize-interview`; for one segment's inner state use `empathy-map`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply animation principles — easing, staging, follow-through — to one specific UI motion. Use when tuning how an animation feels. For product-wide duration and easing tokens use `motion-system` (design-systems); for a full interaction spec use `micro-interaction-spec`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。