Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selects crypto algorithms and usage. Hashing, AES-GCM, RSA, ECDSA, PQC key derivation.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Modern .NET cryptography covering hashing (SHA-256/384/512), symmetric encryption (AES-GCM), asymmetric cryptography (RSA, ECDSA), key derivation (PBKDF2, Argon2), and post-quantum algorithms (ML-KEM, ML-DSA, SLH-DSA) for .NET 10+. Includes TFM-aware guidance: what's available on net10.0 vs fallback strategies for net8.0/net9.0.
Cross-references: [skill:dotnet-security-owasp] for OWASP A02 (Cryptographic Failures) and deprecated pattern warnings, [skill:dotnet-secrets-management] for storing keys and secrets securely.
Use SHA-256/384/512 for integrity verification, checksums, and content-addressable storage. Never use hashing alone for passwords (see Key Derivation below).
using System.Security.Cryptography;
// Hash a byte array
byte[] data = "Hello, world"u8.ToArray();
byte[] hash = SHA256.HashData(data);
// Hash a stream (efficient for large files)
await using var stream = File.OpenRead("largefile.bin");
byte[] fileHash = await SHA256.HashDataAsync(stream);
// Compare hashes securely (constant-time comparison prevents timing attacks)
bool isEqual = CryptographicOperations.FixedTimeEquals(hash1, hash2);
```text
```csharp
// HMAC for authenticated hashing (message authentication codes)
byte[] key = RandomNumberGenerator.GetBytes(32); // 256-bit key
byte[] mac = HMACSHA256.HashData(key, data);
// Verify HMAC
byte[] computedMac = HMACSHA256.HashData(key, receivedData);
if (!CryptographicOperations.FixedTimeEquals(mac, computedMac))
{
throw new CryptographicException("Message authentication failed");
}
```text
---
## Symmetric Encryption (AES-GCM)
AES-GCM is the recommended symmetric encryption for .NET. It provides both confidentiality and authenticity
(authenticated encryption with associated data -- AEAD).
```csharp
using System.Security.Cryptography;
public static class AesGcmEncryptor
{
private const int NonceSize = 12; // 96-bit nonce (required by GCM)
private const int TagSize = 16; // 128-bit authentication tag
public static byte[] Encrypt(byte[] plaintext, byte[] key)
{
var nonce = RandomNumberGenerator.GetBytes(NonceSize);
var ciphertext = new byte[plaintext.Length];
var tag = new byte[TagSize];
using var aes = new AesGcm(key, TagSize);
aes.Encrypt(nonce, plaintext, ciphertext, tag);
// Prepend nonce + append tag for transport
var result = new byte[NonceSize + ciphertext.Length + TagSize];
nonce.CopyTo(result, 0);
ciphertext.CopyTo(result, NonceSize);
tag.CopyTo(result, NonceSize + ciphertext.Length);
return result;
}
public static byte[] Decrypt(byte[] encryptedData, byte[] key)
{
var nonce = encryptedData.AsSpan(0, NonceSize);
var ciphertext = encryptedData.AsSpan(NonceSize, encryptedData.Length - NonceSize - TagSize);
var tag = encryptedData.AsSpan(encryptedData.Length - TagSize);
var plaintext = new byte[ciphertext.Length];
using var aes = new AesGcm(key, TagSize);
aes.Decrypt(nonce, ciphertext, tag, plaintext);
return plaintext;
}
}
```text
```csharp
// ASP.NET Core Data Protection API -- preferred for web application scenarios
// Handles key management, rotation, and storage automatically
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection;
public sealed class TokenProtector(IDataProtectionProvider provider)
{
private readonly IDataProtector _protector =
provider.CreateProtector("Tokens.V1");
public string Protect(string plaintext) => _protector.Protect(plaintext);
public string Unprotect(string ciphertext) => _protector.Unprotect(ciphertext);
}
// Registration:
builder.Services.AddDataProtection()
.SetApplicationName("MyApp")
.PersistKeysToFileSystem(new DirectoryInfo("/keys"));
```text
---
## Asymmetric Cryptography (RSA, ECDSA)
### RSA
Use RSA for encryption of small payloads (key wrapping) and digital signatures. Minimum 2048-bit keys; prefer 4096-bit
for new systems.
```csharp
using System.Security.Cryptography;
// Generate an RSA key pair
using var rsa = RSA.Create(4096);
// Sign data
byte[] signature = rsa.SignData(data, HashAlgorithmName.SHA256, RSASignaturePadding.Pss);
// Verify signature (with public key)
byte[] publicKeyBytes = rsa.ExportRSAPublicKey();
using var rsaPublic = RSA.Create();
rsaPublic.ImportRSAPublicKey(publicKeyBytes, out _);
bool valid = rsaPublic.VerifyData(data, signature, HashAlgorithmName.SHA256, RSASignaturePadding.Pss);
// Encrypt with OAEP padding (never use PKCS#1 v1.5 for new code)
byte[] encrypted = rsaPublic.Encrypt(smallPayload, RSAEncryptionPadding.OaepSHA256);
byte[] decrypted = rsa.Decrypt(encrypted, RSAEncryptionPadding.OaepSHA256);
```text
### ECDSA
Prefer ECDSA over RSA for digital signatures in new projects -- smaller keys with equivalent security.
```csharp
using System.Security.Cryptography;
// Generate ECDSA key (P-256 = NIST curve, widely supported)
using var ecdsa = ECDsa.Create(ECCurve.NamedCurves.nistP256);
// Sign data
byte[] signature = ecdsa.SignData(data, HashAlgorithmName.SHA256);
// Export public key for verification
byte[] publicKey = ecdsa.ExportSubjectPublicKeyInfo();
// Import and verify
using var ecdsaPublic = ECDsa.Create();
ecdsaPublic.ImportSubjectPublicKeyInfo(publicKey, out _);
bool valid = ecdsaPublic.VerifyData(data, signature, HashAlgorithmName.SHA256);
```text
---
## Key Derivation (Password Hashing)
### PBKDF2 (Built-in)
PBKDF2 is built into .NET and acceptable for password hashing. Use at least 600,000 iterations with SHA-256 (OWASP
recommendation).
```csharp
using System.Buffers.Binary;
using System.Security.Cryptography;
public static class PasswordHasher
{
private const int SaltSize = 16; // 128-bit salt
private const int HashSize = 32; // 256-bit derived key
private const int Iterations = 600_000; // OWASP 2023 recommendation for SHA-256
private const int PayloadSize = 4 + SaltSize + HashSize; // iteration count + salt + hash
public static string HashPassword(string password)
{
byte[] salt = RandomNumberGenerator.GetBytes(SaltSize);
byte[] hash = Rfc2898DeriveBytes.Pbkdf2(
password,
salt,
Iterations,
HashAlgorithmName.SHA256,
HashSize);
// Store iteration count (fixed little-endian), salt, and hash together
byte[] result = new byte[PayloadSize];
BinaryPrimitives.WriteInt32LittleEndian(result, Iterations);
salt.CopyTo(result.AsSpan(4));
hash.CopyTo(result.AsSpan(4 + SaltSize));
return Convert.ToBase64String(result);
}
public static bool VerifyPassword(string password, string stored)
{
// Defensive parsing: reject malformed input without exceptions
Span<byte> decoded = stackalloc byte[PayloadSize];
if (!Convert.TryFromBase64String(stored, decoded, out int bytesWritten)
|| bytesWritten != PayloadSize)
{
return false;
}
int iterations = BinaryPrimitives.ReadInt32LittleEndian(decoded);
if (iterations <= 0)
return false;
var salt = decoded.Slice(4, SaltSize);
var expectedHash = decoded.Slice(4 + SaltSize, HashSize);
byte[] actualHash = Rfc2898DeriveBytes.Pbkdf2(
password,
salt,
iterations,
HashAlgorithmName.SHA256,
HashSize);
return CryptographicOperations.FixedTimeEquals(expectedHash, actualHash);
}
}
```text
### Argon2 (via NuGet)
Argon2id is the recommended algorithm for password hashing when a NuGet dependency is acceptable. It is memory-hard,
resisting GPU/ASIC attacks better than PBKDF2.
```csharp
// Requires: <PackageReference Include="Konscious.Security.Cryptography.Argon2" Version="1.*" />
using Konscious.Security.Cryptography;
public static byte[] HashWithArgon2(string password, byte[] salt)
{
using var argon2 = new Argon2id(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(password))
{
Salt = salt,
DegreeOfParallelism = 4, // threads
MemorySize = 65536, // 64 MB
Iterations = 3
};
return argon2.GetBytes(32); // 256-bit hash
}
```text
> Prefer ASP.NET Core Identity's `PasswordHasher<T>` for web applications -- it handles PBKDF2 with correct parameters
> and format versioning automatically. Use custom hashing only for non-Identity scenarios.
---
## Post-Quantum Cryptography (.NET 10+)
.NET 10 introduces post-quantum cryptography (PQC) through the `System.Security.Cryptography` namespace. These
algorithms resist attacks from both classical and quantum computers.
### Platform Requirements
PQC APIs require OS-level support:
- **Windows:** Windows 11 (November 2025 update) or Windows Server 2025 with PQC updates
- **Linux/macOS:** OpenSSL 3.5 or newer
Always check `IsSupported` before using PQC types. On unsupported platforms, fall back to classical algorithms.
### ML-KEM (FIPS 203) -- Key Encapsulation
ML-KEM replaces classical key exchange (ECDH) for establishing shared secrets. It is the most mature .NET 10 PQC API
(not marked `[Experimental]` at class level).
```csharp
#if NET10_0_OR_GREATER
using System.Security.Cryptography;
if (!MLKem.IsSupported)
{
Console.WriteLine("ML-KEM not available on this platform");
return;
}
// Generate a key pair
using MLKem privateKey = MLKem.GenerateKey(MLKemAlgorithm.MLKem768);
// Export public encapsulation key (share with peer)
byte[] publicKeyBytes = privateKey.ExportEncapsulationKey();
// Peer: import public key and encapsulate a shared secret
using MLKem publicKey = MLKem.ImportEncapsulationKey(
MLKemAlgorithm.MLKem768, publicKeyBytes);
publicKey.Encapsulate(out byte[] ciphertext, out byte[] sharedSecret1);
// Original holder: decapsulate to recover the same shared secret
byte[] sharedSecret2 = privateKey.Decapsulate(ciphertext);
// Both parties now have the same shared secret for symmetric encryption
bool match = sharedSecret1.AsSpan().SequenceEqual(sharedSecret2);
#endif
```text
**Parameter sets:**
| Parameter Set | Security Level | Encapsulation Key | Ciphertext |
| -------------------------- | ---------------------- | ----------------- | ----------- |
| `MLKemAlgorithm.MLKem512` | NIST Level 1 (128-bit) | 800 bytes | 768 bytes |
| `MLKemAlgorithm.MLKem768` | NIST Level 3 (192-bit) | 1,184 bytes | 1,088 bytes |
| `MLKemAlgorithm.MLKem1024` | NIST Level 5 (256-bit) | 1,568 bytes | 1,568 bytes |
Prefer `MLKem768` for general use (balances security and performance).
### ML-DSA (FIPS 204) -- Digital Signatures
ML-DSA replaces RSA/ECDSA for quantum-resistant digital signatures.
```csharp
#if NET10_0_OR_GREATER
using System.Security.Cryptography;
if (!MLDsa.IsSupported)
{
Console.WriteLine("ML-DSA not available on this platform");
return;
}
// Generate signing key
using MLDsa key = MLDsa.GenerateKey(MLDsaAlgorithm.MLDsa65);
// Sign data
byte[] data = "Document to sign"u8.ToArray();
byte[] signature = new byte[key.Algorithm.SignatureSizeInBytes];
key.SignData(data, signature);
// Export public key for verification
byte[] publicKeyBytes = key.ExportMLDsaPublicKey();
// Verify with public key
using MLDsa publicKey = MLDsa.ImportMLDsaPublicKey(
MLDsaAlgorithm.MLDsa65, publicKeyBytes);
bool valid = publicKey.VerifyData(data, signature);
#endif
```text
**Parameter sets:**
| Parameter Set | Security Level | Public Key | Signature |
| ------------------------ | -------------- | ----------- | ----------- |
| `MLDsaAlgorithm.MLDsa44` | NIST Level 2 | 1,312 bytes | 2,420 bytes |
| `MLDsaAlgorithm.MLDsa65` | NIST Level 3 | 1,952 bytes | 3,309 bytes |
| `MLDsaAlgorithm.MLDsa87` | NIST Level 5 | 2,592 bytes | 4,627 bytes |
### SLH-DSA (FIPS 205) -- Hash-Based Signatures
SLH-DSA (Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Algorithm) provides extremely conservative long-term signatures. Use
when mathematical structure of lattice-based schemes (ML-DSA) is a concern. The entire `SlhDsa` class is
`[Experimental]` (SYSLIB5006) -- Windows has not yet added native support.
```csharp
#if NET10_0_OR_GREATER
using System.Security.Cryptography;
// SlhDsa is [Experimental] -- suppress SYSLIB5006 only when intentional
#pragma warning disable SYSLIB5006
if (SlhDsa.IsSupported)
{
using SlhDsa key = SlhDsa.GenerateKey(SlhDsaAlgorithm.SlhDsaSha2_128s);
byte[] data = "Long-term document"u8.ToArray();
byte[] signature = new byte[key.Algorithm.SignatureSizeInBytes];
key.SignData(data, signature);
bool valid = key.VerifyData(data, signature);
}
#pragma warning restore SYSLIB5006
#endif
```text
### Fallback Strategy for net8.0/net9.0
Post-quantum algorithms are only available in .NET 10+. For applications targeting earlier TFMs:
1. **Use classical algorithms now:** ECDSA (P-256/P-384) for signatures, ECDH + AES-GCM for key exchange/encryption.
These remain secure against classical attacks.
2. **Prepare for migration:** Isolate cryptographic operations behind interfaces so algorithm swaps require minimal code
changes.
3. **Multi-target when ready:** Use `#if NET10_0_OR_GREATER` conditionals or separate assemblies per TFM to add PQC
support alongside classical fallbacks.
4. **Harvest-now-decrypt-later:** For data that must remain confidential for 10+ years, consider migrating to .NET 10
sooner to protect against future quantum decryption of captured ciphertext.
### Interoperability Caveats
- **Key and signature sizes:** PQC keys and signatures are significantly larger than classical equivalents (e.g.,
ML-DSA-65 signature is 3,309 bytes vs ECDSA P-256 at 64 bytes). This affects storage, bandwidth, and protocol message
sizes.
- **No cross-platform PQC yet:** PQC APIs depend on OS crypto libraries. An app compiled for net10.0 will fail at
runtime on older OS versions. Always gate behind `IsSupported`.
- **PKCS#8/X.509 formats are experimental:** Import/export of PQC keys in standard certificate formats is
`[Experimental]` pending IETF RFC finalization. Do not persist PQC keys in PKCS#8 format in production yet.
- **Composite/hybrid signatures:** `CompositeMLDsa` (hybrid ML-DSA + classical) is fully `[Experimental]` with no native
OS support. Use it only for prototyping.
- **TLS integration:** ML-DSA and SLH-DSA certificates work in TLS 1.3+ via `SslStream`, but only when the OS crypto
library supports PQC in TLS. Verify with your deployment target.
- **Performance:** ML-KEM and ML-DSA are fast. SLH-DSA is significantly slower for signing (seconds, not milliseconds)
-- use it only when hash-based security guarantees are required.
---
## Deprecated Cryptographic APIs
The following cryptographic algorithms are broken or obsolete. Do not use them in new code.
| Algorithm | Replacement | Reason |
| -------------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |
| MD5 | SHA-256+ | Collision attacks since 2004; trivially broken |
| SHA-1 | SHA-256+ | Collision attacks demonstrated (SHAttered, 2017) |
| DES | AES-GCM | 56-bit key; brute-forceable in hours |
| 3DES (TripleDES) | AES-GCM | Deprecated by NIST (2023); Sweet32 attack |
| RC2 | AES-GCM | Weak key schedule; effective key length < advertised |
| RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 encryption | RSA-OAEP | Bleichenbacher padding oracle attacks |
For the full list of deprecated security patterns beyond cryptography (CAS, APTCA, .NET Remoting, DCOM,
BinaryFormatter), see [skill:dotnet-security-owasp] which is the canonical owner of deprecated security pattern
warnings.
---
## Agent Gotchas
1. **Never reuse a nonce with AES-GCM** -- reusing a nonce with the same key breaks both confidentiality and
authenticity. Always generate a fresh random nonce per encryption operation.
2. **Never use ECB mode** -- ECB encrypts identical plaintext blocks to identical ciphertext blocks, leaking patterns.
.NET's `Aes.Create()` defaults to CBC, but prefer AES-GCM for authenticated encryption.
3. **Never compare hashes with `==`** -- use `CryptographicOperations.FixedTimeEquals` to prevent timing side-channel
attacks.
4. **Never use MD5 or SHA-1 for security purposes** -- they are broken. SHA-1 is acceptable only for non-security
checksums (e.g., git object hashes) where collision resistance is not a security requirement.
5. **Never hardcode encryption keys** -- use [skill:dotnet-secrets-management] for key storage. Generate keys with
`RandomNumberGenerator.GetBytes`.
6. **Minimum RSA key size is 2048 bits** -- NIST deprecated 1024-bit RSA keys. Use 4096 for new systems.
7. **PBKDF2 iteration count must be high** -- OWASP recommends 600,000 iterations with SHA-256 (as of 2023). Lower
counts are brute-forceable.
8. **PQC `IsSupported` checks are mandatory** -- calling PQC APIs on unsupported platforms throws
`PlatformNotSupportedException`. Always check before use.
9. **Do not suppress SYSLIB5006 globally** -- suppress the experimental diagnostic only at the specific call site where
you intentionally use experimental PQC APIs.
---
## Code Navigation (Serena MCP)
**Primary approach:** Use Serena symbol operations for efficient code navigation:
1. **Find definitions**: `serena_find_symbol` instead of text search
2. **Understand structure**: `serena_get_symbols_overview` for file organization
3. **Track references**: `serena_find_referencing_symbols` for impact analysis
4. **Precise edits**: `serena_replace_symbol_body` for clean modifications
**When to use Serena vs traditional tools:**
- ✅ **Use Serena**: Navigation, refactoring, dependency analysis, precise edits
- ✅ **Use Read/Grep**: Reading full files, pattern matching, simple text operations
- ✅ **Fallback**: If Serena unavailable, traditional tools work fine
**Example workflow:**
```text
# Instead of:
Read: src/Services/OrderService.cs
Grep: "public void ProcessOrder"
# Use:
serena_find_symbol: "OrderService/ProcessOrder"
serena_get_symbols_overview: "src/Services/OrderService.cs"
```
## References
- [ASP.NET Core Security](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/?view=aspnetcore-10.0)
- [Security in .NET](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/security/)
- [Secure Coding Guidelines for .NET](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/security/secure-coding-guidelines)
- [Cryptography Model in .NET](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/security/cryptography-model)
- [Post-Quantum Cryptography in .NET](https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/post-quantum-cryptography-in-dotnet/)
- [ASP.NET Core Data Protection](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/data-protection/introduction?view=aspnetcore-10.0)
- [OWASP Password Storage Cheat Sheet](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Password_Storage_Cheat_Sheet.html)
- [NIST FIPS 203 (ML-KEM)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/203/final)
- [NIST FIPS 204 (ML-DSA)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/204/final)
- [NIST FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/205/final)
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive AI prompt engineering safety review and improvement prompt. Analyzes prompts for safety, bias, security vulnerabilities, and effectiveness while providing detailed improvement recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when user requests research requiring multiple sources, comprehensive analysis, or synthesis across topics - technical research, domain knowledge gathering, market analysis, or learning about complex subjects
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered wiki generation for code repositories with commands, agents, and skills
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building .NET 10 or C# 14 applications; when using minimal APIs, modular monolith patterns, or feature folders; when implementing HTTP resilience, Options pattern, Channels, or validation; when seeing outdated patterns like old extension method syntax
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements accessible .NET UI. SemanticProperties, ARIA, AutomationPeer, testing per platform.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。