本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

soak-test

Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md9.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Soak Test

A soak test (also called an endurance test) is an extended play session run with specific observation goals. Unlike a smoke check (broad critical path, ~10 min) or a single-feature playtest (~30 min), a soak test runs for 30 minutes to several hours to surface:

  • Memory leaks — gradual heap growth that only appears after scene transitions
  • Performance drift — frame time degradation that worsens over time
  • State accumulation bugs — issues that only appear after N repetitions of a mechanic (inventory full, score overflow, AI state corruption)
  • Fun fatigue — mechanics that feel good in a first session but grow repetitive over extended play
  • Content exhaustion — the point where players run out of novel content

This skill generates the observation protocol and analysis harness — the human does the actual playing.

Output: production/qa/soak-test-[date]-[duration].md

When to run:

  • Polish phase — before /gate-check release
  • After fixing a memory or stability issue (regression soak)
  • When extended play has not been formally tracked

1. Parse Arguments

Duration (default: 1h):

  • 30m — short soak; suitable for testing a single mechanic or scene
  • 1h — standard soak; covers most common leak categories
  • 2h — extended soak; recommended for first full Polish soak
  • 4h — deep soak; required for games with long session design (RPGs, sims)

Focus (default: all):

  • memory — focus on heap size, object count, leak patterns
  • stability — focus on crash/freeze/hang detection
  • balance — focus on fun fatigue, content exhaustion, difficulty perception
  • all — all of the above

2. Load Context

Read:

  • docs/framework/technical-preferences.md — engine (for engine-specific memory monitoring guidance), performance budgets (memory ceiling, target FPS)
  • design/gdd/game-concept.md — intended session length (for comparison against soak duration), core loop description
  • Most recent file in production/playtests/ — prior playtest findings (to avoid re-documenting known issues)
  • Most recent file in production/qa/qa-plan-*.md — current sprint test coverage (to understand what has been formally tested vs. what the soak covers)

Note any performance budget targets from technical-preferences.md:

  • Memory ceiling: [N MB, or "not set"]
  • Target FPS: [N, or "not set"]
  • Frame budget: [N ms, or "not set"]

3. Define Observation Checkpoints

Based on duration, generate timed checkpoints:

30m soak: T+0, T+10, T+20, T+30 1h soak: T+0, T+15, T+30, T+45, T+60 2h soak: T+0, T+20, T+40, T+60, T+80, T+100, T+120 4h soak: T+0, T+30, T+60, T+90, T+120, T+180, T+240

At each checkpoint, the observer records the observation items defined in Phase 4.


4. Generate the Soak Test Protocol

Memory / Stability observation items (if focus = memory or all)

Engine-specific monitoring guidance:

Godot 4:

  • Open Debugger → Monitors tab; track Memory → Static Memory and Object Count → Objects across checkpoints
  • Record: Static Memory (KB), Object Count, Orphan Nodes count
  • Alert threshold: Memory growth > 20% from T+0 after the first 15 minutes (some growth on load is expected; sustained growth indicates a leak)
  • Note: Performance.get_monitor(Performance.MEMORY_STATIC) returns bytes in Godot 4.6

Unity:

  • Open Memory Profiler (Window → Analysis → Memory Profiler)
  • Record: Total Reserved Memory (MB), GC Allocated (MB), Object Count at each checkpoint
  • Alert threshold: GC Allocated growing monotonically across 3+ checkpoints

Unreal Engine:

  • Use stat memory console command at each checkpoint
  • Record: Physical Memory Used (MB), Physical Memory Available
  • Alert threshold: Physical Memory Used growth > 50MB over the full soak

Stability observation items (if focus = stability or all)

At each checkpoint, note:

  • No crash, hang, or freeze occurred since last checkpoint
  • Frame rate still within target budget ([target FPS] fps)
  • Audio still playing correctly (no desync or silence)
  • All HUD elements still rendering correctly
  • Input responding as expected (no input loss or lag spike)

Balance / fatigue observation items (if focus = balance or all)

Collect subjective observations at each checkpoint:

  • Core mechanic still feels rewarding (Y/N)
  • Perceived difficulty level: [too easy / appropriate / too hard]
  • Any "I've seen this before" moments since last checkpoint? (novel content exhaustion)
  • Any moment of frustration since last checkpoint? Note cause.
  • Any moment of peak engagement since last checkpoint? Note cause.

5. Generate the Protocol Document

# Soak Test Protocol

> **Date**: [date]
> **Duration**: [duration]
> **Focus**: [memory | stability | balance | all]
> **Engine**: [engine]
> **Generated by**: /soak-test

---

## Pre-Session Setup

Before starting the soak:

- [ ] Game is running from a **fresh launch** (not resumed from a prior session)
- [ ] All background applications closed (minimise OS memory interference)
- [ ] Performance monitoring tool open and recording:
  - **Godot**: Debugger → Monitors tab → Memory section visible
  - **Unity**: Memory Profiler window open
  - **Unreal**: `stat memory` ready in console
- [ ] Soak target confirmed: [session design intent from game concept]
- [ ] Prior known issues to watch for: [from most recent playtest / qa-plan]

---

## Baseline (T+0) — Record Before Playing

| Metric | Baseline Value |
|--------|---------------|
| Memory / Heap | [record before first frame of gameplay] |
| Object Count | [record] |
| FPS (first 30 seconds) | [record] |
| [Engine-specific metric] | [record] |

---

## Checkpoint Log

### T+[N] minutes

**Memory / Stability** *(if applicable)*:

| Metric | Value | Δ from Baseline | Alert? |
|--------|-------|-----------------|--------|
| Memory / Heap | | | |
| Object Count | | | |
| FPS | | | |
| Crashes / Hangs | | | |

**Stability checks**:
- [ ] No crash or hang since last checkpoint
- [ ] Frame rate within budget ([N] fps target)
- [ ] Audio correct
- [ ] HUD rendering correctly
- [ ] Input responding correctly

**Balance / Fatigue** *(if applicable)*:
- Core mechanic still rewarding: Y / N
- Difficulty perception: too easy / appropriate / too hard
- Notable moments: [note any peak engagement or frustration]
- Content exhaustion signs: Y / N — [describe]

**Free observations**:
*(Note anything unexpected observed since the last checkpoint)*

---

[Repeat Checkpoint Log section for each timed checkpoint]

---

## Post-Session Analysis

### Memory Trend

| Checkpoint | Memory | Δ/hr extrapolated |
|------------|--------|-------------------|
| T+0 | | |
| [T+N] | | |

**Leak detected?** Y / N
**Estimated time to OOM at current rate**: [N hours / not applicable]

### Stability Summary

Total crashes: [N]
Total hangs: [N]
Worst FPS observed: [N] fps at [checkpoint]
Performance degradation: stable / mild / severe

### Balance / Fatigue Summary

Fun curve: [engaged throughout / fatigue onset at T+N / repetitive from start]
Content exhaustion point: [never / at T+N / early]
Difficulty arc: [appropriate / too easy throughout / difficulty spike at T+N]

### Issues Found

| ID | Severity | Checkpoint | Description |
|----|----------|------------|-------------|
| SOAK-001 | S[1-4] | T+[N] | [description] |

---

## Verdict: PASS / PASS WITH CONCERNS / FAIL

**PASS**: No leaks detected, stability maintained, fun factor consistent
**PASS WITH CONCERNS**: Minor drift or fatigue noted; addressable in Polish
**FAIL**: Memory leak confirmed, stability breach, or severe fun fatigue

---

## Sign-Off

- **Tester**: [name] — [date]
- **QA Lead review**: [name] — [date]

6. Write Output

Present the protocol summary in conversation, then ask:

"May I write this soak test protocol to production/qa/soak-test-[date]-[duration].md?"

Write only after approval.

After writing:

"Protocol written. To run the soak:

  1. Open the file and follow the Pre-Session Setup checklist
  2. Record each checkpoint as you play
  3. Complete the Post-Session Analysis section when done
  4. File bugs from 'Issues Found' to production/qa/bugs/
  5. Run /bug-triage sprint after the session to integrate any S1/S2 issues

If the verdict is FAIL, run /smoke-check again after fixing the issues."


Collaborative Protocol

  • This skill generates a protocol — humans run it — never attempt to run a soak test automatically. The observations require a human observer.
  • Duration should match the game's session design — a 5-minute game doesn't need a 4h soak; a city-builder might. Use judgment and ask if unclear.
  • First soak should be all focus — narrow focus (memory-only) is for regression soaks after a specific fix, not the first pass
  • Ask before writing — always confirm before creating the protocol file

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

adopt

無料

Brownfield onboarding — audits existing project artifacts for template format compliance (not just existence), classifies gaps by impact, and produces a numbered migration plan. Run this when joining an in-progress project or upgrading from an older template version. Distinct from /project-stage-detect (which checks what exists) — this checks whether what exists will actually work with the template's skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios912026年10月7日 更新

Creates an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) documenting a significant technical decision, its context, alternatives considered, and consequences. Every major technical choice should have an ADR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios912026年10月7日 更新

Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios912026年10月7日 更新

art-bible

無料

Guided, section-by-section Art Bible authoring. Creates the visual identity specification that gates all asset production. Run after /concept-brainstorm is approved and before /map-systems or any GDD authoring begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios912026年10月7日 更新

Generates placeholder .aseprite files from asset specs using the Aseprite MCP. Reads asset specs and art bible, creates sprites with correct dimensions/palette/layers, exports PNGs. Run after /asset-spec has produced specs and /art-bible exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios912026年10月7日 更新

Audits game assets for compliance with naming conventions, file size budgets, format standards, and pipeline requirements. Identifies orphaned assets, missing references, and standard violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios912026年10月7日 更新

striderZA のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する