Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
ste-writer
Write new English text, or rewrite existing text, in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English. Use for STE, simple technical English, ASD-STE100, or 80% STE, for writing or rewriting procedures, manuals, SOPs, runbooks, and release notes.
インストール方法を見る含まれるファイル(1)
- SKILL.md9.6 KB
SKILL.md(原文)
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
ste-writer
Write English that follows the main writing rules of ASD-STE100 (Simplified Technical English). This works in two situations:
- Rewrite: the user gives existing text and wants it converted.
- Write new: the user gives facts, notes, bullet points, a topic, or code and wants a new document written in STE from the start.
Why this works
STE exists so that a reader who knows only a little English can follow instructions with no risk of misreading them. The method is simple: one meaning per word, one idea per sentence, and no clever phrasing. The result reads a little plain, but every sentence has one clear meaning. It also machine-translates well.
Be honest about what this is
This skill applies the core rules from memory. It does not include the official ASD-STE100 specification or its approved-word Dictionary. Do not claim the output is "STE-compliant" or "certified". Say it is "written to the main ASD-STE100 rules". If the user needs formal compliance, tell them to check the result with the official Dictionary or a checker tool. If they provide the spec or a word list, follow it over these notes.
Choose the strictness
Default to full (apply every rule below). If the user asks for a softer result ("80%", "lightly", "keep my tone"), use soft mode: apply rules 1 to 6, keep the author's technical terms and natural rhythm, and allow some longer sentences up to about 25 words. State which mode you used.
Core rules
- One instruction per sentence. In a procedure, write each action as its own numbered step. Keep procedure sentences to 20 words or fewer. Keep descriptive sentences to 25 words or fewer.
- Use the imperative for actions. "Remove the cover." Not "The cover should be removed." Put the command first, then the reason or condition after it.
- Use the active voice. Name who or what does the action. Use the passive only when the actor is unknown or unimportant, and keep it rare in procedures.
- Use simple verb tenses only. Use the simple present, simple past, and future ("will"). Avoid the perfect ("has been done"), the progressive ("is running"), conditional ("would", "could"), and subjunctive forms.
- Keep one word for one meaning. Pick one term for each thing and use it every time, even if it sounds repetitive. Do not swap in synonyms for variety. Use each word only as the part of speech it is mostly used as ("test" as a noun or a verb, but do not turn a noun into a verb on your own).
- Choose the simple, common word. "Use", not "utilize". "Start", not "commence". "Show", not "demonstrate". Keep real technical names as they are, such as part names, product names, and standard terms of the field. See the word swaps below.
- Keep articles and short helper words. Write "the", "a", and "an". Do not drop them to save space, and do not write telegraphic text.
- Break up noun clusters. Use at most three nouns in a row. Rewrite "hydraulic pump pressure relief valve adjustment screw" as "the screw that adjusts the relief valve of the hydraulic pump".
- Avoid ambiguous phrasal verbs and idioms. Replace "set up", "carry out", "figure out", "back off" with a single clear verb such as "install", "do", "find", "loosen". Cut idioms and metaphors entirely.
- Avoid contractions and unclear pronouns. Write "do not", not "don't". Repeat the noun if "it" or "this" could point to more than one thing.
- Group related sentences into short paragraphs. One topic per paragraph, at most six sentences. Put the main point in the first sentence.
- Give warnings and cautions first. Put them before the step they apply to. Write them as a clear command and give the reason. Use "WARNING" for danger to people and "CAUTION" for danger to equipment or data.
- Use "must" for requirements, "can" for ability, and "may" for permission. Avoid "should", "might", "would", and "ought to", which blur whether a step is required.
- Write numbers as digits and keep the unit with the number ("5 mm", "30 seconds"). Use words only for "one" when it is not a measurement.
Word swaps
These are typical simplifications. Keep a word if it is an approved technical name in the user's field, and keep the same replacement every time in one document.
| Avoid | Use |
|---|---|
| utilize | use |
| commence, initiate | start |
| terminate | stop, end |
| demonstrate, indicate | show |
| ensure | make sure |
| verify | check |
| prior to | before |
| subsequent to, following | after |
| in order to | to |
| in the event that | if |
| approximately | about |
| sufficient | enough |
| require (verb) | need |
| obtain | get |
| attempt (verb) | try |
| assist | help |
| purchase | buy |
| set up, carry out, figure out | install or prepare, do, find |
| back off (a screw) | loosen |
| a number of | some, several (or give the number) |
| it is recommended that | use a command: "Do this." |
| should | must (if required), or rewrite as a command |
| could, would, might | can, will, or remove the doubt |
| don't, can't, won't | do not, cannot, will not |
| ASAP | as soon as possible, or give the time |
Common patterns:
- Passive to command: "The filter shall be replaced every 100 hours." becomes "Replace the filter every 100 hours."
- Two actions to two steps: "Disconnect the cable and remove the cover." becomes "1. Disconnect the cable. 2. Remove the cover."
- Long noun cluster to a phrase: "engine oil pressure sensor connector" becomes "the connector of the engine oil pressure sensor".
- Hidden condition to "If": "In case of leakage, stop." becomes "If there is a leak, stop."
Workflow
When rewriting existing text
- Read the whole text first. Note the technical terms that must not change, and the one term chosen for each concept.
- Rewrite section by section. Keep the facts, order, and structure (headings, lists, tables, code, links, version numbers) exactly as they are. Never add facts that the source does not give.
- If a sentence is too vague to rewrite without guessing (a missing actor, an unclear "it", a missing value), do not invent an answer. Rewrite it as clearly as possible, mark the spot with
[CHECK: ...], and list it in the notes. - Reread the output once against rules 1 to 6 and 9. Split any sentence that still holds two actions.
When writing new text
- Find out the reader and the job of the document: who reads it, what they must be able to do, and which kind of document it is (procedure, description, warning, release note). If the user gave only a topic and the facts are missing, ask for them in one short message. If the user is not available to answer, write what the given facts support and mark every gap with
[CHECK: ...]. - Decide the key terms first. Choose one name for each part, tool, screen, and action, and use it every time.
- Pick the structure that fits the job. Procedures: a one-line purpose, then numbered steps in time order, with warnings before the step they apply to. Descriptions: the main point first, then short paragraphs with one topic each. Release notes: one change per line, starting with a verb.
- Write from the facts the user gave. Do not invent values, names, limits, or steps. A missing value, such as a torque, a time, or a command, gets a
[CHECK: ...]marker, not a guess. - Reread the draft once against rules 1 to 6 and 9.
Output format
Reply in the language the user wrote their request in, but keep the document itself in English.
Give, in this order:
- The document, in a format that suits where it will be used (Markdown stays Markdown; plain text stays plain text). When rewriting a file, write the result to a new file next to it and do not overwrite the original.
- For a rewrite, a short Changes list of the 3 to 6 most important kinds of change, each with one before/after example from the text. For new text, a short list of the key terms that were chosen, so the user can keep them the same in later documents.
- A Questions for the author list for every
[CHECK: ...]spot. Skip this if there are none. - One line giving the mode (full or soft) and the reminder that this is not official certification.
Keep the notes short. The user wants the document first, not an essay about the rules.
Examples
Rewrite. Input: "Before the unit is powered on, it should be ensured that all of the connectors have been properly seated, otherwise damage could occur."
Output: "CAUTION: Make sure that all connectors are fully connected before you start the unit. If a connector is loose, the unit can be damaged."
Notes: the passive was changed to a command, the perfect tense was removed, "should be ensured" became "Make sure", and the caution was moved to the front with its reason.
Write new. Input facts: "Reset procedure for the badge printer. Hold the button, wait for the light. Takes about a minute. Unplug first."
Output: "# Reset the badge printer\n\nUse this procedure to reset the badge printer to its factory settings.\n\nCAUTION: Disconnect the power cable before you start. [CHECK: Is the reason for this step known? Add it if it is.]\n\n1. Disconnect the power cable.\n2. Connect the power cable.\n3. Push and hold the button. [CHECK: How long must the user hold the button?]\n4. Wait until the light comes on. [CHECK: Which color is the light?]\n5. Wait 1 minute for the reset to end."
Notes: the facts did not give the hold time or the light color, so those spots are marked and not guessed. The order of the first steps follows the facts the user gave.
レビュー
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
同じリポジトリのスキル
概要と使いどころ
AI活用提案の専門コンサルタントスキル。LLM・AIエージェントの活用事例知識を基に、業界別、部門別、シーン別に最適なAI導入提案を行います。システム化、業務改善、効率化を得意とし、具体的な活用事例、期待効果、導入ステップを含む実践的な提案を提供します。Use when proposing AI/LLM adoption strategies for specific industries, departments, or business scenarios.
Generate AI-powered BPO service proposals for Japanese companies in the US market. Use when creating outsourcing proposals with AI service menus, ROI estimation, implementation roadmaps, and bilingual (JA/EN) proposal documents for 在米日系企業向けAI実装.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI(LLM)が生成した日本語テキストの「AI臭」を検出・診断し、人間らしい文章にリライトするスキル。 Use when: 「AIっぽい文章を直して」「人間らしくリライトして」「AI臭を消して」「この文章をもっと自然にして」 「テキストのAI感を減らして」「機械っぽさを取りたい」 "make this sound more human", "remove AI tone", "humanize this text", "detect if this is AI-generated". 6つのAI特有パターン(視覚的マーカー、単調なリズム、マニュアル的構成、非コミット姿勢、抽象語の濫用、 定型メタファー)を正規表現ベースで検出し、0-100のAI臭スコアを算出。3つの人間化技法 (バランスを崩す・客観を崩す・論理を崩す)でリライトを実行する。 Note: 検出スクリプトは日本語テキスト専用。英語テキストの場合はClaude自身がreferences/を参照して分析・リライトする。
Generate audit-ready internal control design documents from As-Is business process inventories. Produces control IDs, assertion mappings, procedures, SoD analysis, KPIs, materiality thresholds, and implementation roadmaps. Use when building internal controls for new audit engagements, SOX/J-SOX compliance, or process improvement initiatives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review audit-related documents (control design documents, bottleneck analyses, requirements definitions, etc.) for quality, scoring them 0-100 with a severity-rated findings list. Use when reviewing audit documents, checking control design quality, or verifying cross-document consistency. Supports documents governed by US GAAP, IFRS, or J-GAAP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。