「iterative」の検索結果

Deep, iterative internet research for current facts, source triangulation, contradiction checks, due diligence, competitive analysis, claim verification, "latest" lookups, and cited reports. Use when the user asks to browse, search, research the web, verify claims, compare sources, gather primary sources, investigate companies, people, products, technical topics, news, events, markets, or create AKBP-ready durable research evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run iterative IA deepening, finalize shard, update indexes/tracker, and enforce ambiguity gates before handoff

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative Python via live Jupyter kernel (hamelnb).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously improve a real artifact (code, training recipe, agent harness, data pipeline, prompt) against an objective and an evaluator, using Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR) from the Arbor paper. Use this whenever someone wants to iteratively optimize something over many experiments without overfitting — e.g. "get my model's eval score up", "improve this agent/harness", "tune this pipeline", "beat the baseline on this benchmark", "run a search over approaches and keep the best", "do an MLE-bench / Kaggle-style optimization", or any long-horizon "make this artifact better and don't just memorize the dev set" task. Trigger it even when the user doesn't say "Arbor" or "hypothesis tree" but describes repeated experiment-and-evaluate loops, branching exploration of competing ideas, or worries about a dev/test gap. Runs Claude itself as the coordinator with subagent executors in isolated git worktrees; for the standalone `arbor` CLI tool see references/arbor-upstream.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an iterative Stitch website-building loop using `.stitch/next-prompt.md`, SITE.md, DESIGN.md, generated pages, and verification checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively improve a Claude Code skill using the skill-reviewer agent until it meets quality standards. Use when improving a skill with multiple quality issues, iterating on a new skill until it meets standards, or automated fix-review cycles instead of manual editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convergence loop that iteratively improves work until quality thresholds are met. Scores, diagnoses specific weaknesses, rewrites, re-scores, and repeats until all dimensions reach 8/10 or diminishing returns are detected. Use when you want to refine or iterate on work, after the analyst gives a REVISE verdict, or when output quality is below your bar. Part of the architect-system loop. Outputs to system/refinery-log.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convergence loop that iteratively improves work until quality thresholds are met. Use when: (1) "refine this", "make this better", "iterate on this", (2) After /analyst gives a REVISE verdict, (3) Output quality is below 8/10, (4) "run the refinery loop on this". Reads analyst reviews from system/reviews/. Generates, scores, diagnoses, rewrites, re-scores. Stops when all dimensions >= 8/10 or diminishing returns detected. Outputs to system/refinery-log.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative session history with timestamped checkpoints and LATEST.md symlink

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative Python via live Jupyter kernel (hamelnb).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive investigation of complex multi-domain narratives (technology, theology, policy, finance). Systematically decouples factual claims from speculation through iterative verification, multi-source comparison, and contradiction resolution. Use for investigations requiring institutional knowledge, historical context, and handling of conflicting incentives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, synthesize, and iteratively improve agent skills following the Agent Skills specification. Use when asked to "create a skill", "write a skill", "synthesize sources into a skill", "improve a skill from positive/negative examples", "update a skill", or "maintain skill docs and registration". Handles source capture, precision passes, authoring, registration, and validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates, optimizes, and iteratively refines agent prompts, system prompts, developer prompts, and reusable prompt templates. Use when asked to improve a prompt, optimize a system prompt, rewrite an agent prompt, tune prompt wording, make a prompt more reliable, port prompts between OpenAI, Claude, or Gemini, or build prompt evals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative lead optimization with analyze-reason-generate-verify-evaluate loop. Paper-backed (MT-Mol, DrugR, MultiMol).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively detects and auto-fixes technical debt in a codebase using three quality criteria from debt-analysis references: conditional branch simplification, encapsulation, and separation of concerns. Applies fixes directly to code, runs existing tests to verify no regressions, re-analyzes, and loops until all high-severity issues are resolved or max iterations (5) reached. Use this skill when you want to automatically improve code quality with real code changes, reduce technical debt systematically, or clean up code to meet quality standards. Trigger on phrases like "fix technical debt", "clean up code quality", "refactor and fix issues", "improve code quality automatically", "apply debt fixes", "fix code problems", "eliminate debt".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply continuous improvement principles to iteratively enhance processes, code quality, team practices, and system performance through small, incremental changes. Use when improving development processes, optimizing workflows, reducing waste, enhancing code quality over time, implementing retrospective learnings, or fostering a culture of continuous improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous Reforge-guided refactor workflow for the Humans repository. Use when the user wants Codex to target a section such as Shifts, Users, Teams, Tickets, Camps, or Store, create a dedicated worktree/branch from origin/main, run iterative architecture-focused improvements, score each stage with Reforge, gate commits through a score-blind read-only architecture review, append score and verdict details to commit messages after review acceptance, push progress, and open a PR when the loop reaches stasis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use /plan-design-review. Use when asked to "audit the design", "visual QA", "check if it looks good", or "design polish". Proactively suggest when the user mentions visual inconsistencies or wants to polish the look of a live site. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "quality check", "test the app", "run QA".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate coding tasks to Claude Code (Anthropic's CLI agent). Use for building features, refactoring, PR reviews, and iterative coding. Requires the claude CLI installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run build, deploy, inspect, and fix loops for .NET MAUI apps that already have MAUI DevFlow integrated. USE FOR: launching MAUI apps, selecting devices or emulators, waiting for or recovering agent connections, broker/port/adb connectivity issues, visual tree inspection, screenshots, UI interaction, Blazor WebView CDP debugging, reading DevFlow logs, and iterative app debugging. DO NOT USE FOR: first-time DevFlow package setup (use maui-devflow-onboard), or generic desktop automation unrelated to MAUI. INVOKES: maui devflow CLI, dotnet CLI, Android adb/android tools, and Apple simctl tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add MAUI DevFlow to a .NET MAUI project with agent package references, MauiProgram.cs registration, Blazor WebView support, GTK variants, Central Package Management guidance, and verification commands. USE FOR: first-time DevFlow setup, reviewing what files to edit, choosing DevFlow packages, or continuing after `maui devflow init` installs skills. DO NOT USE FOR: troubleshooting an already-integrated app that cannot connect, iterative app debugging, UI inspection, or generic MAUI build failures (use maui-devflow-debug). INVOKES: maui devflow CLI and dotnet CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

サブエージェントのコンテキスト問題を解決するための段階的コンテキスト取得パターン