本文へ移動
cccskills

「deploy」の検索結果

3,033 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Generates OpenAPI 3.0/3.1 specs, TypeScript client types, and curl examples from existing route handler code. Supports Express, Next.js API routes, Fastify, and Hono. Produces complete documentation including auth requirements, rate limits, error codes, and request/response examples. Activate on: 'generate API docs', 'OpenAPI from code', 'document endpoints', 'API reference', 'swagger generation', 'endpoint documentation'. NOT for: API design from scratch (use api-architect), deployment (use devops-automator), testing (use test-automation-expert).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Expert API designer for REST, GraphQL, gRPC architectures. Activate on: API design, REST API, GraphQL schema, gRPC service, OpenAPI, Swagger, API versioning, endpoint design, rate limiting, OAuth flow. NOT for: database schema (use data-pipeline-engineer), frontend consumption (use web-design-expert), deployment (use devops-automator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Verifies build output integrity after code changes. Runs builds, validates artifact structure, checks for regressions in bundle size, asset references, and static export completeness. The last line of defense before a bad deploy ships.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Analyze repeated non-engagement, deflection, motte-and-bailey shifts, tone policing, sealioning, and related manipulative discourse patterns. Use when the user suspects they are being rhetorically managed rather than answered, or when they need a careful pattern read grounded in quotes and alternatives. NOT for psychiatric diagnosis, legal judgment, or help deploying bad-faith tactics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Architecture and systems design for agents that retain bounded state across sessions. Covers durable event history, owned state, derived memory, retrieval indexes, framework evaluation, recovery, deletion, and rebuild behavior. Uses constructed implementation examples and workload calibration rather than universal vendor, latency, similarity, retention, or cost claims. Activate on: "always-on agent", "persistent agent architecture", "episodic memory system", "agent memory design", "long-running agent", "stateful agent", "agent that remembers", "MemGPT architecture", "Letta deployment", "/always-on-agent-architecture". NOT for: choosing what data to feed the agent (use always-on-agent-inputs), brainstorming applications (use always-on-agent-applications), safety and privacy concerns (use always-on-agent-safety), general agentic patterns (use agentic-patterns).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Design RL simulation sandboxes, trajectory datasets, QLoRA/LoRA adaptation plans, eval harnesses, and rollback unhooks for agents learning specific coding behaviors beyond the base model. Use when building or reviewing tool-use training loops, offline trajectories, reward functions, self-improvement harnesses, or Port Daddy agent behavior curricula. NOT for generic ML tutorials, full model training operations, or production deployment without eval gates and safety unhooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Design and scaffold new skills, subagents, and MCP surfaces. Use when choosing which primitive to create. NOT for invoking existing agents, generic coding help, or deployment work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Safety-case design for always-on agents with episodic memory. Covers data hygiene, privacy and security risk surfaces, cost controls, scope, user dependency concerns, retention, incident containment, and responsible deployment evidence. It identifies hazards and asks for named controls, tests, owners, and residual uncertainty; it does not provide legal, clinical, youth-safety, or jurisdictional determinations. Activate on: "agent safety", "always-on agent privacy", "agent cost control", "persistent agent risks", "AI companion safety", "agent data hygiene", "runaway agent costs", "parasocial AI risk", "/always-on-agent-safety". NOT for: architecture design (use always-on-agent-architecture), input design (use always-on-agent-inputs), application brainstorming (use always-on-agent-applications), healthcare compliance specifically (use hipaa-compliance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新